Evaluation of the updated confocal laser endomicroscopy criteria for Barrett's esophagus among gastrointestinal pathologists

Diseases of the Esophagus

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 623-629

  Tofteland, N ^a,b   Singh, M ^a,b   Gaddam, S ^a   Wani, S B ^a,b   Gupta, N ^a,b   Rastogi, A ^a,b   Bansal, A ^a,b   Kanakadandi, V ^a   Mcgregor, D H ^a   Ulusarac, O ^a   Cherian, R ^a   Mathur, S C ^a   Sharma, P ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Barrett's esophagus; Confocal laser endomicroscopy; Dysplasia; Interobserver agreement; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIST; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS DYSPLASIA; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBE BASED CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEORECORDING; ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PROCEDURES;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NEOPLASM GRADING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84906790692     PISSN: 11208694     EISSN: 14422050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dote.12121     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Sharma P. Clinical practice. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2548-2556.
2. Spechler S J, Sharma P, Souza R F, Inadomi J M, Shaheen N J. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1084-1091.
3. Wang K K, Sampliner R E. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 788-797.
4. Wallace M B, Sharma P, Lightdale C etal. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 19-24.
5. Gaddam S, Mathur S C, Singh M etal. Novel probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy criteria and inter-observer agreement for the detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1961-1969.
6. Sharma P, Meining A R, Coron E etal. Real-time increased detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: final results of an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 465-472.
7. Bertani H, Frazzoni M, Dabizzi E etal. Improved detection of incident dysplasia by probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in a Barrett's esophagus surveillance program. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 188-193.
8. Bajbouj M, Vieth M, Rösch T etal. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy compared with standard four-quadrant biopsy for evaluation of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 435-440.
9. Reid B J, Haggitt R C, Rubin C E etal. Observer variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Hum Pathol 1988; 19: 166-178.
10. Downs-Kelly E, Mendelin J E, Bennett A E etal. Poor inter-observer agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2333-2340; quiz 41.
11. Montgomery E, Bronner M P, Goldblum J R etal. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 368-378.