The Making cases count intiative

Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 621-624

  Relton, C ^a   Viksveen, P ^a   Kessler, U ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft fur Homoopathie ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Homeopaths; Homeopathy; Patient perspective; Routine data collection; Stakeholders; Validated outcome measures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; HOMEOPATHY; HUMANS;

EID: 84906790639     PISSN: 09652299     EISSN: 18736963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Spence D.S., Thompson E.A., Barron E.A. Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: a 6-year, university hospital outpatient observational study. J Altern Complement Med 2005, 11(5):793-798.
2. Witt C., Keil T., Selim D., Roll S., Vance W., Wegscheider K., et al. Outcome and costs of homeopathic and conventional treatment strategies: a comparative cohort study in patients with chronic disorders. Complement Ther Med 2005, 13(2):79-86.
3. Dempster A. Homeopathy within the NHS; Evaluation of homeopathic treatment of common mental health problems 1995-7, Rydings Hall Surgery, Brighouse, West Yorks 1998, Society of Homeopaths.
4. Treuherz F. An Audit of 500 consecutive patients referred for homeopathy in general practice between 1993-1998, at Bounds Green Group practice 1999, Society of Homeopaths.
5. Ward A., Christie E.A. Report on NHS practice-based homeopathic project: Analysis of effectiveness and cost of homeopathic treatment within a GP practice at St Mary's Surgery, Bradford on Avon, Wilts 1996, Society of Homeopaths.
6. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ 1996, 312(7037):1016-1020.
7. Hughes S.L., Smith A., Relton C. Homeopathy service in an NHS hospital breast cancer clinic: outcome study. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10(s 2):93.
8. Relton C., Weatherley-Jones E. Homeopathy service in a NHS community menopause clinic: audit of clinical outcomes. J Br Menopause Soc 2005, 11(2):72-73.
9. Making Cases Count,. http://www.makingcasescount.org/.
10. Paterson C., Britten N. In pursuit of patient-centred outcomes: a qualitative evaluation of the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile. J Health Serv Res Policy 2000, 5:27-36.
11. Relton C., Chatfield K., Partington H., Foulkes L. Patients treated by homeopaths registered with the Society of Homeopaths: a pilot study. Homeopathy 2007, 96:87-89.
12. Heger M. Data collection in homeopathic practice using the internet - a first step in creating a valid and systematic multi-national database on clinical cases. Congress proceedings: improving the success of homeopathy 2000.
13. Rezzani C.M. WinCHIP: computerised Homeopathic Investigation Program: a data collection tool to help the doctor in daily practice to prove and improve homeopathy. Br Homeopath J 2000, 89(Suppl. 1):S41.
14. Thompson E.A., Mathie R.T., Baitson E.S., et al. Towards standard setting for patient-reported outcomes in the NHS homeopathic hospitals. Homeopathy 2008, 97:114-121.
15. EvaMed project. http://www.fih-berlin.de/evamed.html.
16. Witt C.M., Lüdtke R., Baur R., Willich S.N. Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC Public Health. 2005, 5:115.