Nanovesicles engineered from ES cells for enhanced cell proliferation

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 34, 2014, Pages 9302-9310

  Jeong, Dayeong ^a   Jo, Wonju ^a   Yoon, Jaewoong ^a   Kim, Junho ^a   Gianchandani, Sachi ^b   Gho, Yong Song ^a   Park, Jaesung ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell proliferation; ECM; Fibroblasts; Growth factor; Nanoparticles; Stem cell

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; FIBROBLASTS; LIPID BILAYERS; MILITARY ELECTRONIC COUNTERMEASURES; NANOPARTICLES; STEM CELLS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS;

BIOLOGICAL SIGNALS; CELL PROLIFERATION RATE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GROWTH FACTOR; ISOLATION PROCESS; NON-TREATED CELLS; THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION; WOUND HEALING PROCESS; EXPRESSION LEVELS;

CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; CYCLINE; KI 67 ANTIGEN; MESSENGER RNA; NANOPARTICLE; NANOVESICLE; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VASCULOTROPIN; VASCULOTROPIN A; CARRIER PROTEIN; NANOMATERIAL; PAF PROTEIN, MOUSE; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EXOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION; LIPID BILAYER; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SKIN FIBROBLAST; CELL COUNT; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL VACUOLE; EMBRYO; FIBROBLAST; MICROFILTRATION; NANOENGINEERING; NANOVESICLE; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

MURINAE;

ANIMALS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN TYPE I; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EXOSOMES; FIBROBLASTS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOSTRUCTURES; RNA, MESSENGER; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84906785653     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.047     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Flanagan M. The physiology of wound healing. JWound Care 2000, 9:299-300.
2. Richardson M. Acute wounds: an overview of the physiological healing process. Nurs Times 2004, 100:50-53.
3. Skover G.R. Cellular and biochemical dynamics of wound repair. Wound environment in collagen regeneration. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1991, 8:723-756.
4. Inflammation Hart J. 1: Its role in the healing of acute wounds. JWound Care 2002, 11:205-209.
5. Acharya P.S., Majumdar S., Jacob M., Hayden J., Mrass P., Weninger W., et al. Fibroblast migration is mediated by CD44-dependent TGF beta activation. JCell Sci 2008, 121:1393-1402.
6. Cordeiro M.F., Bhattacharya S.S., Schultz G.S., Khaw P.T. TGF-beta1, -beta2, and -beta3 invitro: biphasic effects on Tenon's fibroblast contraction, proliferation, and migration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000, 41:756-763.
7. Stern M.M., Myers R.L., Hammam N., Stern K.A., Eberli D., Kritchevsky S.B., et al. The influence of extracellular matrix derived from skeletal muscle tissue on the proliferation and differentiation of myogenic progenitor cells exvivo. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2393-2399.
8. Gospodarowicz D., Delgado D., Vlodavsky I. Permissive effect of the extracellular matrix on cell proliferation invitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1980, 77:4094-4098.
9. Cohen S.M., Ellwein L.B. Genetic errors, cell proliferation, and carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1991, 51:6493-6505.
10. Brama M., Basciani S., Cherubini S., Mariani S., Migliaccio S., Arizzi M., et al. Osteoblast-conditioned medium promotes proliferation and sensitizes breast cancer cells to imatinib treatment. Endocr Relat Cancer 2007, 14:61-72.
11. Shen Q., Goderie S.K., Jin L., Karanth N., Sun Y., Abramova N., et al. Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science 2004, 304:1338-1340.
12. Fillinger M.F., O'Connor S.E., Wagner R.J., Cronenwett J.L. The effect of endothelial cell coculture on smooth muscle cell proliferation. JVasc Surg 1993, 17:1058-1067. discussion 67-8.
13. Cornil I., Theodorescu D., Man S., Herlyn M., Jambrosic J., Kerbel R.S. Fibroblast cell interactions with human melanoma cells affect tumor cell growth as a function of tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991, 88:6028-6032.
14. Kim W.S., Park B.S., Sung J.H., Yang J.M., Park S.B., Kwak S.J., et al. Wound healing effect of adipose-derived stem cells: a critical role of secretory factors on human dermal fibroblasts. JDermatol Sci 2007, 48:15-24.
15. Hocking A.M., Gibran N.S. Mesenchymal stem cells: paracrine signaling and differentiation during cutaneous wound repair. Exp Cell Res 2010, 316:2213-2219.
16. Smith A.N., Willis E., Chan V.T., Muffley L.A., Isik F.F., Gibran N.S., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells induce dermal fibroblast responses to injury. Exp Cell Res 2010, 316:48-54.
17. Chen L., Tredget E.E., Wu P.Y., Wu Y. Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing. PLoS One 2008, 3:e1886.
18. Lee E.Y., Xia Y., Kim W.S., Kim M.H., Kim T.H., Kim K.J., et al. Hypoxia-enhanced wound-healing function of adipose-derived stem cells: increase in stem cell proliferation and up-regulation of VEGF and bFGF. Wound Repair Regen 2009, 17:540-547.
19. Jeon Y.K., Jang Y.H., Yoo D.R., Kim S.N., Lee S.K., Nam M.J. Mesenchymal stem cells' interaction with skin: wound-healing effect on fibroblast cells and skin tissue. Wound Repair Regen 2010, 18:655-661.
20. Deregibus M.C., Cantaluppi V., Calogero R., Lo Iacono M., Tetta C., Biancone L., et al. Endothelial progenitor cell derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood 2007, 110:2440-2448.
21. Hong B.S., Cho J.H., Kim H., Choi E.J., Rho S., Kim J., et al. Colorectal cancer cell-derived microvesicles are enriched in cell cycle-related mRNAs that promote proliferation of endothelial cells. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:556.
22. Skog J., Wurdinger T., van Rijn S., Meijer D.H., Gainche L., Sena-Esteves M., et al. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:1470-1476.
23. Valadi H., Ekstrom K., Bossios A., Sjostrand M., Lee J.J., Lotvall J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:654-659.
24. Ratajczak J., Miekus K., Kucia M., Zhang J., Reca R., Dvorak P., et al. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia 2006, 20:847-856.
25. Ratajczak J., Wysoczynski M., Hayek F., Janowska-Wieczorek A., Ratajczak M.Z. Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia 2006, 20:1487-1495.
26. Thery C., Amigorena S., Raposo G., Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2006, 1-29. [Chapter 3]:Unit 3.22.
27. Jo W., Jeong D., Kim J., Cho S., Jang S.C., Han C., et al. Microfluidic fabrication of cell-derived nanovesicles as endogenous RNA carriers. Lab Chip 2014, 14:1261-1269.
28. Harford J.B. Preparation and isolation of cells. Current protocols in cell biology 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
29. Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408.
30. Pan G., Thomson J.A. Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Cell Res 2007, 17:42-49.
31. Hadjipanayi E., Mudera V., Brown R.A. Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness. JTissue Eng Regen Med 2009, 3:77-84.
32. Vunjak-Novakovic G., Obradovic B., Martin I., Bursac P.M., Langer R., Freed L.E. Dynamic cell seeding of polymer scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog 1998, 14:193-202.
33. Liang C.C., Park A.Y., Guan J.L. Invitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration invitro. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:329-333.
34. Kee N., Sivalingam S., Boonstra R., Wojtowicz J.M. The utility of Ki-67 and BrdU as proliferative markers of adult neurogenesis. JNeurosci Methods 2002, 115:97-105.
35. Albersen M., Fandel T.M., Lin G., Wang G., Banie L., Lin C.S., et al. Injections of adipose tissue-derived stem cells and stem cell lysate improve recovery of erectile function in a rat model of cavernous nerve injury. JSex Med 2010, 7:3331-3340.
36. Chakraborty N.G., Sporn J.R., Tortora A.F., Kurtzman S.H., Yamase H., Ergin M.T., et al. Immunization with a tumor-cell-lysate-loaded autologous-antigen-presenting-cell-based vaccine in melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 1998, 47:58-64.
37. Maier T., Tun-Kyi A., Tassis A., Jungius K.P., Burg G., Dummer R., et al. Vaccination of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma using intranodal injection of autologous tumor-lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Blood 2003, 102:2338-2344.
38. Evans E., Needham D. Physical properties of surfactant bilayer membranes: thermal transitions, elasticity, rigidity, cohesion and colloidal interactions. JPhys Chem 1987, 91:4219-4228.
39. Jang S.C., Kim O.Y., Yoon C.M., Choi D.S., Roh T.Y., Park J., et al. Bioinspired exosome-mimetic nanovesicles for targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics to malignant tumors. ACS Nano 2013, 7:7698-7710.
40. Davies R.T., Kim D., Park J. Formation of liposomes using a 3D flow focusing microfluidic device with spatially patterned wettability by corona discharge. JMicromech Microeng 2012, 22:055003.
41. Helfrich W. Stiffening of fluid membranes and entropy loss of membrane closure: two effects of thermal undulations. Eur Phys J B 1998, 1:481-489.
42. Hernandez-Zapata E., Martinez-Balbuena L., Santamaria-Holek I. Thermodynamics and dynamics of the formation of spherical lipid vesicles. JBiol Phys 2009, 35:297-308.
43. Sun D., Zhuang X., Zhang S., Deng Z.B., Grizzle W., Miller D., et al. Exosomes are endogenous nanoparticles that can deliver biological information between cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013, 65:342-347.
44. Takai Y., Miyoshi J., Ikeda W., Ogita H. Nectins and nectin-like molecules: roles in contact inhibition of cell movement and proliferation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:603-615.
45. Lv H., Zhang S., Wang B., Cui S., Yan J. Toxicity of cationic lipids and cationic polymers in gene delivery. JControl Release 2006, 114:100-109.
46. Petersen S., Steiniger F., Fischer D., Fahr A., Bunjes H. The physical state of lipid nanoparticles influences their effect on invitro cell viability. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011, 79:150.
47. Phillips R., Kondev J., Theriot J., Orme N., Garcia H. Physical biology of the cell 2009, Garland Science, New York.
48. Broughton G., Janis J., Attinger C. Wound healing: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 117:1e.
49. Parsonage G., Filer A.D., Haworth O., Nash G.B., Rainger G.E., Salmon M., et al. Astromal address code defined by fibroblasts. Trends Immunol 2005, 26:150.
50. Zhang W., Liu H. MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res 2002, 12:9.
51. Baum C., Arpey C. Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg 2005, 31:674.
52. Greenhalgh D. The role of apoptosis in wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1998, 30:1019.
53. Labler L., Mica L., Härter L., Trentz O., Keel M. Influence of VAC-therapy on cytokines and growth factors in traumatic wounds. Zentralbl Chir 2006, 131:S62.
54. Lawrence W. Physiology of the acute wound. Clin Plast Surg 1998, 25:321.
55. Velnar T., Bailey T., Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. JInt Med Res 2009, 37:1528-1542.