Is the connectivity function a good indicator of soil infiltrability distribution and runoff flow dimension?

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1514-1525

  Harel, Marie Alice ^a   Mouche, Emmanuel ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Flow dimension; Percolation; Queueing theory; Runoff runon

Indexed keywords

PERCOLATION (SOLID STATE); PIXELS; QUEUEING THEORY; RAIN; SOLVENTS;

CONNECTIVITY; CONNECTIVITY FUNCTION; FLOW DIMENSION; RAINFALL INTENSITY; RUNOFF PATTERNS; RUNOFF PRODUCTION; RUNOFF-RUNON; SOIL HETEROGENEITY;

RUNOFF;

CONNECTIVITY; INFILTRATION; PERCOLATION; PRECIPITATION INTENSITY; RAINFALL; RUNOFF;

EID: 84906780652     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3604     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams R, Western A, Seed A. 2012. An analysis of the impact of spatial variability in rainfall on runoff and sediment predictions from a distributed model. Hydrological Processes 26: 3263-3280.
2. Ali G, Roy A. 2010. Shopping for hydrologically representative connectivity metrics in a humid temperate forested catchment. Water Resources Research 46: W12544.
3. Allard D, Group H. 1993. On the connectivity of two random set models: the truncated Gaussian and the Boolean. Geostatistics Tróia 92: 467-478.
4. Antoine M, Javaux M, Bielders C. 2009. What indicators can capture runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot scale Advances in Water Resources 32: 1297-1310.
5. Barker J. 1988. A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock. Water Resources Research 24: 1796-1804.
6. Bracken L, Croke J. 2007. The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrological Processes 21: 1749-1763.
7. Bracken L, Wainwright J, Ali G, Tetzlaff D, Smith M, Reaney S, Roy A. 2013. Concepts of hydrological connectivity: research approaches, pathways and future agendas. Earth-Science Reviews 119: 17-34.
8. Cammeraat E. 2004. Scale dependent thresholds in hydrological and erosion response of a semi-arid catchment in southeast Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104: 317-332.
9. Corradini C, Morbidelli R, Melone F. 1998. On the interaction between infiltration and Hortonian runoff. Journal of Hydrology 204: 52-67.
10. Gomi T, Sidle R, Miyata S, Kosugi K, Onda Y. 2008. Dynamic runoff connectivity of overland flow on steep forested hillslopes: scale effects and runoff transfer. Water Resources Research 44: W08411.
11. Govindaraju R, Corradini C, Morbidelli R. 2006. A semi-analytical model of expected areal-average infiltration under spatial heterogeneity of rainfall and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. Journal of Hydrology 316: 184-194.
12. Grimmett G. 2000. Percolation. Springer: Berlin.
13. Harel M-A, Mouche E. 2013. 1D steady state runoff production in light of queuing theory: heterogeneity, connectivity and scale. Water Resources Research 49: 7973-7991.
14. Hawkins R, Cundy T. 1987. Steady-state analysis of infiltration and overland flow for spatially-varied hillslopes. Water Resources Bulletin 23: 251-256.
15. Hopp L, McDonnell J. 2009. Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. Journal of Hydrology 376: 378-391.
16. Howes D, Abrahams A. 2003. Modeling runoff and runon in a desert shrubland ecosystem, Jornada basin, New Mexico. Geomorphology 53: 45-73.
17. Jensen I. 2001. Enumerations of lattice animals and trees. Journal of Statistical Physics 102: 865-881.
18. Jones O, Sheridan G, Lane P. 2009. A stochastic runoff model incorporating spatial variability. in 18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Anderssen R, Braddock R, and Newham L. (eds), Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Cairns, Australia, pp. 1865-1871.
19. Kragt M, Newham LTH, Jakeman AJ. 2009. A Bayesian network approach to integrating economic and biophysical modelling. in 18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Anderssen RS, Braddock RD, and Newham LTH, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, pp. 2377-2383. http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim09/F12/kragt.pdf.
20. Knudby C, Carrera J. 2005. On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity. Advances in Water Resources 28: 405-421.
21. Liu Y, Gebremeskel S, De Smedt F, Hoffmann L, Pfister L. 2003. A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling. Journal of Hydrology 283: 91-106.
22. Michaelides K, Chappell A. 2009. Connectivity as a concept for characterising hydrological behaviour. Hydrological Processes 23: 517-522.
23. Michaelides K, Wilson M. 2007. Uncertainty in predicted runoff due to patterns of spatially variable infiltration. Water Resources Research 43: W02415.
24. Morbidelli R, Corradini C, Govindaraju R. 2006. A field-scale infiltration model accounting for spatial heterogeneity of rainfall and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. Hydrological Processes 20: 1465-1481.
25. Morbidelli R, Corradini C, Govindaraju R. 2007. A simplified model for estimating field-scale surface runoff hydrographs. Hydrological Processes 21: 1772-1779.
26. Mueller E, Wainwright J, Parsons A. 2007. Impact of connectivity on the modeling of overland flow within semiarid shrubland environments. Water Resources Research 43: W09412.
27. Nahar N, Govindaraju R, Corradini C, Morbidelli R. 2004. Role of run- on for describing field-scale infiltration and overland flow over spatially variable soils. Journal of Hydrology 286: 36-51.
28. O'Connell N. 1999. Directed percolation and tandem queues. HP Labs Technical Report DIAS-APG-9912. Hewlett-Packard, 2000. (downloaded from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2000/HPL-BRIMS-2000-28.html).
29. Patin J, Mouche E, Ribolzi O, Chaplot V, Sengtahevanghoung O, Latsachak K, Soulileuth B, Valentin C. 2012. Analysis of runoff production at the plot scale during a long-term survey of a small agricultural catchment in Lao PDR. Journal of Hydrology 426: 79-92.
30. Reaney SM, Bracken LJ, Kirkby MJ. 2013. The importance of surface controls on overland flow connectivity in semi-arid environments: results from a numerical experimental approach. Hydrological Processes 28: 2116-2128.
31. Renard P, Allard D. 2011. Connectivity metrics for subsurface flow and transport. Advances in Water Resources 51: 168-196.
32. Saghafian B, Julien P, Ogden F. 1995. Similarity in catchment response: 1. Stationary rainstorms. Water Resources Research 31: 1533-1541.
33. Sen S, Srivastava P, Dane J, Yoo K, Shaw J. 2010. Spatial temporal variability and hydrologic connectivity of runoff generation areas in a north Alabama pasture: implications for phosphorus transport. Hydrological Processes 24: 342-356.
34. Stauffer D, Aharony A. 1994. Introduction to Percolation Theory. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
35. Stone J, Paige G, Hawkins R. 2008. Rainfall intensity-dependent infiltration rates on rangeland rainfall simulator plots. Transactions of the ASAE 51: 45-53.
36. Van Dijk A, Bruijnzeel L. 2004. Runoff and soil loss from bench terraces. 1. An event-based model of rainfall infiltration and surface runoff. European Journal of Soil Science 55: 299-316.
37. Van Nieuwenhuyse B, Antoine M, Wyseure G, Govers G. 2011. Pattern-process relationships in surface hydrology: hydrological connectivity expressed in landscape metrics. Hydrological Processes 25: 3760-3773.
38. Wainwright J, Turnbull L, Ibrahim T, Lexartza-Artza I, Thornton S, Brazier R. 2011. Linking environmental régimes, space and time: interpretations of structural and functional connectivity. Geomorphology 126: 387-404.
39. Walker DD, Roberts RM. 2003. Flow dimensions corresponding to hydrogeologic conditions. Water Resources Research 39: 1349.
40. Western A, Blöschl G, Grayson R. 2001. Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns. Water Resources Research 37: 83-97.
41. Woolhiser D, Smith R, Giraldez J. 1996. Effects of spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity on Hortonian overland flow. Water Resources Research 32: 671-678.
42. Yu B, Rose C, Coughlan K, Fentie B. 1997. Plot-scale rainfall-runoff characteristics and modeling at six sites in Australia and Southeast Asia. Transactions of the ASAE 40: 1295-1303.