Fairness and social welfare in service allocation schemes for participatory sensing

Computer Networks

Volumn 73, Issue , 2014, Pages 58-71

  Tham, Chen Khong ^a   Luo, Tie ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Optimization; Participatory sensing; Service allocation; Utility and fairness

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; OPTIMIZATION; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING;

BUILT-IN SENSORS; LARGE-SCALE DATUM; LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTIONS; NASH EQUILIBRIA; PARTICIPATORY SENSING; REPUTATION BASED INCENTIVES; SERVICE ALLOCATIONS; UTILITY AND FAIRNESS;

STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 84906751274     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, A. Parker, N. Ramanathan, S. Reddy, M.B. Srivastava, Participatory sensing, in: ACM Sensys Workshop on World Sensor Web (WSW), 2006.
2. M. Mun, S. Reddy, K. Shilton, N. Yau, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, E. Howard, R. West, P. Boda, PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research, in: ACM MobiSys, 2009, pp. 55-68.
3. P. Dutta, P.M. Aoki, N. Kumar, A. Mainwaring, C. Myers, W. Willett, A. Woodruff, Common sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors, in: ACM SenSys, 2009.
4. J.K.-S. Lau, C.-K. Tham, T. Luo, Participatory cyber physical system in public transport application, in: Proc. CCSA, IEEE/ACM UCC, 2011.
5. J. Brustein, Projects Use Phone Data to Track Public Services, New York Times, June 5, 2011.
6. J.-S. Lee, B. Hoh, Sell your experiences: a market mechanism based incentive for participatory sensing, in: IEEE PerCom, 2010.
7. D. Christin, C. Rosskopf, M. Hollick, L.A. Martucci, S.S. Kanhere, Incognisense: an anonymity-preserving reputation framework for participatory sensing applications, in: IEEE PerCom, 2012, pp. 135-143.
8. J. Park, M. van der Schaar, Incentive provision using intervention, in: IEEE INFOCOM, 2011.
9. S. Reddy, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, M. Srivastava, Examining micro-payments for participatory sensing data collections, in: UbiComp, 2010.
10. R. Jain, D.-M. Chiu, and W. Hawe A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems ACM Comput. Res. Repos. (CoRR) 1998
11. S. Shenker Fundamental design issues for the future Internet IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13 1995
12. P. Marbach Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks: a market-based approach IEEE Trans. Network. 13 2005
13. R. Ma, S. Lee, J. Lui, and D. Yau Incentive and service differentiation in P2P networks: a game theoretic approach IEEE Trans. Network. 14 2006 978 991 (Pubitemid 44615109)
14. S. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe Convex Optimization 2004 Cambridge University Press
15. D. Tse, and P. Viswanath Fundamentals of Wireless Communication 2005 Cambridge University Press
16. E. Rasmusen Games and information: an introduction to game theory fourth ed. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Oxford
17. A. Prekopa Stochastic programming 1995 Kluwer Dordrecht
18. M. Chu, H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks Int. J. High Perf. Comput. Appl. 16 2002
19. A. Krause, E. Horvitz, A. Kansal, F. Zhao, Toward community sensing, in: ACM/IEEE IPSN, 2008.
20. H.-X. Tan, M.-C. Chan, W. Xiao, P.-Y. Kong, C.-K. Tham, Information quality aware routing in event-driven sensor networks, in: IEEE INFOCOM, 2010.
21. K. Iwamura, and B. Liu A genetic algorithm for chance constrained programming J. Inform. Opt. Sci. 17 1996 409 422 (Pubitemid 127094848)