Early experience and reproductive morph both affect brain morphology in adult male Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 71, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1430-1436

  Wiper, Mallory L ^a   Britton, Stephanie ^a,b   Higgs, Dennis M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906748696     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: 12057533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0624     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aiello, L., and Wheeler, P. 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: The brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 36(2): 199-221. doi:10.1086/204350.
2. Barrickman, N.L., Bastian, M.L., Isler, K., and van Schaik, C.P. 2008. Life history costs and benefits of encephalization: a comparative test using data from long-term studies of primates in the wild. J. Hum. Evol.54(5): 568-590. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.08.012. PMID:18068214.
3. Barton, R.A. 1998. Visual specialization and brain evolution in primates. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.265(1409): 1933-1937. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0523.
4. Barton, R.A. 2006. Primate brain evolution: Integrating comparative, neurophysiological, and ethological data. Evol. Anthropol.15(6): 224-236. doi:10.1002/ evan.20105.
5. Bass, A. 1992. Dimorphic male brains and alternative reproductive tactics in a vocalizing fish. Trends Neurosci.15(4): 139-145. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92) 90356-D. PMID:1374972.
6. Bass, A. 1996. Shaping brain sexuality. Am. Sci.84: 352-363.
7. Bass, A., and Baker, R. 1990. Sexual dimorphisms in the vocal control system of a teleost fish: morphology of physiologically identified neurons. J. Neurobiol. 21(8): 1155-1168. doi:10.1002/neu.480210802. PMID:2273398.
8. Biro, P.A., Abrahams, M.V., Post, J.R., and Parkinson, E.A. 2004. Predators select against high growth rates and risk-taking behaviour in domestic trout populations. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.271(1554): 2233-2237. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004. 2861.
9. Bullmore, E., Brammer, M., Harvey, I., and Ron, M. 1995. Against the laterality index as a measure of cerebral asymmetry. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging, 61(2): 121-124. doi:10.1016/0925-4927(95)02618-8.
10. Burns, J.G., Saravanan, A., and Rodd, F.H. 2009. Rearing environment affects the brain size of guppies: lab-reared guppies have smaller brains than wildcaught guppies. Ethology,115(2): 122-133. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01585.x.
11. Day, L.B., Westcott, D.A., and Olster, D.H. 2005. Evolution of bower complexity and cerebellum size in bowerbirds. Brain Behav. Evol.66(1): 62-72. doi:10. 1159/000085048. PMID:15855743.
12. de Winter, W., and Oxnard, C.E. 2001. Evolutionary radiations and convergences in the structural organization of mammalian brains. Nature,409(6821): 710-714. doi:10.1038/35055547. PMID:11217859.
13. Finlay, B.L., and Darlington, R.B. 1995. Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science,268(5217): 1578-1584. doi:10. 1126/science.7777856. PMID:7777856.
14. Fitzpatrick, J.L., Almbro, M., Gonzalez-Voyer, A., Hamada, S., Pennington, C, Scanlan, J., and Kolm, N. 2012. Sexual selection uncouples the evolution of brain and body size in pinnipeds. J. Evol. Biol.25(7): 1321-1330. doi:10.1111/j. 1420-9101.2012.02520.x. PMID:22530668.
15. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1992. Reproductive behavior of hatchery and wild Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): Does it differ? Aquaculture, 103(2): 101-121. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(92)90405-A.
16. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1993. Breeding success of hatchery and wild Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecol. Appl. 3(2): 230-245. doi: 10.2307/1941826.
17. Fleming, I.A., Jonsson, B., Gross, M.R., and Lamberg, A. 1996. An experimental study of the reproductive behaviour and success of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J. Appl. Ecol.33(4): 893-905. doi:10.2307/2404960.
18. Gonda, A., Herczeg, G., and Merilä, J. 2009. Adaptive brain size divergence in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius)? J. Evol. Biol. 22(8): 1721-1726. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01782.x. PMID:19549140.
19. Gonda, A., Herczeg, G., and Merila, J. 2011. Population variation in brain size of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius)-local adaptation or environmentally induced variation? BMC Evol. Biol.11(75). doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-75.
20. Gonzalez-Voyer, A., Winberg, S., and Kolm, N. 2009. Distinct evolutionary patterns of brain and body size during adaptive radiation. Evolution, 63(9): 2266-2274. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00705.x. PMID:19473380.
21. Goodson, J.L., and Bass, A. 2000. Forebrain peptides modulate sexually polymorphicvocal circuitry. Nature,403: 769-772. doi:10.1038/35001581. PMID: 10693805.
22. Gross, M.R. 1991. Salmon breeding behavior and life history evolution in changing environments. Ecology,72(4): 1180-1186. doi:10.2307/1941091.
23. Guay, P.-J., and Iwaniuk, A.N. 2008. Captive breeding reduces brain volume in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Condor,110(2): 276-284. doi:10.1525/cond.2008. 8424.
24. Harvey, P.H., Clutton-Brock, T.H., and Mace, G.M. 1980. Brain size and ecology in small mammals and primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.77(7): 4387-4389. doi:10. 1073/pnas.77.7.4387.
25. Healy, S.D., and Rowe, C. 2007. A critique of comparative studies of brain size. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.274(1609): 453-464. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3748.
26. Hofmann, H.A., and Fernald, R.D. 2000. Social status controls somatostatin neuron size and growth. J. Neurosci.20(12): 4740-4744. PMID:10844043.
27. Huber, R., van Staaden, M.J., Kaufman, L.S., and Liem, K.F. 1997. Microhabitat use, trophic patterns, and the evolution of brain structure in African cichlids. Brain Behav. Evol.50(3): 167-182. doi:10.1159/000113330. PMID:9288416.
28. Iwaniuk, A.N., Dean, K.M., and Nelson, J.E. 2004. A mosaic pattern characterizes the evolution of the avian brain. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.271(4): S148-S151. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0127.
29. Kihslinger, R.L., and Nevitt, G.A. 2006. Early rearing environment impacts cerebellar growth in juvenile salmon. J. Exp. Biol.209(3): 504-509. doi:10.1242/ jeb.02019. PMID:16424100.
30. Kihslinger, R.L., Lema, S.C., and Nevitt, G.A. 2006. Environmental rearing conditions produce forebrain differences in wild Chinook salmonOncorhynchus tshawytscha. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol.145(2): 145-151. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.06.041.
31. Köhler, M., and Moyà-Solà, S. 2004. Reduction of brain and sense organs in the fossil insular bovid Myotragus. Brain Behav. Evol. 63: 125-140. doi:10.1159/ 000076239. PMID:14726622.
32. Kolm, N., Gonzalez-Voyer, A., Brelin, D., and Winberg, S. 2009. Evidence for small scale variation in the vertebrate brain: mating strategy and sex affect brain size and structure in wild brown trout (Salmo trutta). J. Evol. Biol.22(12): 2524-2531. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01875.x. PMID:19878498.
33. Kotrschal, A., Rogell, B., Bundsen, A., Svensson, B., Zajitschek, S., Brännström, I., Immler, S., Maklakov, A.A., and Kolm, N. 2013. Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain. Curr. Biol.23(2): 168-171. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.058. PMID:23290552.
34. Kotrschal, K., van Staaden, M.J., and Huber, R. 1998. Fish brains: evolution and environmental relationships. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish.8(4): 373-408. doi:10.1023/ A:1008839605380.
35. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Cooper, K.A., Barrett, D., Johnston, M., Swanson, P., and Dickhoff, W.W. 2004. Assessment of high rates of precocious male maturation in a spring Chinook salmon supplementation hatchery program. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.133(1): 98-120. doi:10.1577/T03-031.
36. Lasker, R. 1984. Marine fish larvae: morphology, ecology, and relation to fisheries. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.
37. Lema, S.C., Hodges, M.J., Marchetti, M.P., and Nevitt, G.A. 2005. Proliferation zones in the salmon telencephalon and evidence for environmental influence on proliferation rate. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 141(3): 327-335. doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.06.003.
38. Lemaître, J.F., Ramm, S.A., Barton, R.A., and Stockley, P. 2009. Sperm competition and brain size evolution in mammals. J. Evol. Biol. 22(11): 2215-2221. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01837.x. PMID:20069724.
39. Marchetti, M.P., and Nevitt, G.A. 2003. Effects of hatchery rearing practices on brain structures of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environ. Biol. Fishes, 66(1): 9-14.
40. Mink, J.W., Blumenschine, R.J., and Adams, D.B. 1981. Ratio of central nervous system to body metabolism in vertebrates: its constancy and functional basis. Am. J. Physiol.241(3): R203-R212. PMID:7282965.
41. Näslund, J., Aarestrup, K., Thomassen, S.T., and Johnsson, J.I. 2012. Early enrichment effects on brain development in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): no evidence for a critical period. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(9): 1481-1490. doi:10.1139/f2012-074.
42. Nelson, J.S. 2006. Fishes of the world. 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
43. Pitnick, S., Jones, K.E., and Wilkinson, G.S. 2006. Mating system and brain size in bats. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.273(1587): 719-724. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3367.
44. Pollen, A.A., Dobberfuhl, A.P., Scace, J., Igulu, M.M., Renn, S.C.P., Shumway, C.A., and Hofmann, H.A. 2007. Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in Lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav. Evol.70(1): 21-39. doi:10.1159/000101067. PMID:17389793.
45. Roberts, L.J., and de Leaniz, C.G. 2011. Something smells fishy: predator-naïve salmon use diet cues, not kairomones, to recognize a sympatric mammalian predator. Anim. Behav.82(4): 619-625. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.06.019.
46. Schwerdtfeger, W.K., Oelschläger, H.A., and Stephan, H. 1984. Quantitative neuroanatomy of the brain of the La Plata dolphin, Pontoporia blainvillei. Anat. Embryol.170(1): 11-19. doi:10.1007/BF00319453. PMID:6433744.
47. Smaers, J.B., Dechmann, D.K.N., Goswami, A., Soligo, C., and Safi, K. 2012. Comparative analyses of evolutionary rates reveal different pathways to encephalization in bats, carnivorans, and primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(44): 18006-18011. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212181109. PMID:23071335.
48. Sol, D., Duncan, R.P., Blackburn, T.M., Cassey, P., and Lefebvre, L. 2005. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102(15): 5460-5465. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408145102. PMID:15784743.
49. Striedter, G. 2005. Evolutionary changes in overall brain size. In Principles of brain evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass. pp. 93-135.
50. Swain, D.P., and Riddell, B.E. 1990. Variation in agonistic behavior between newly emerged juveniles from hatchery and wild populations of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.47(3): 566-571. doi:10. 1139/f90-065.
51. Vander Haegen, G.E., Blankenship, H.L., Hoffmann, A., and Thompson, D.A. 2005. The effects of adipose fin clipping and coded wire tagging on the survival and growth of spring Chinook salmon. N. Am. J. Fish Manage.25(3): 1161-1170. doi:10.1577/M04-011.1.
52. Zaunreiter, M., Junger, H., and Kotrschal, K. 1991. Retinal morphology of cyprinid fishes: a quantitative histological study of ontogenetic shifts and interspecific variation. Vision Res. 31(3): 383-394. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91) 90091-I. PMID:1843750.