Taking goal models downstream: A systematic roadmap

Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Horkoff, Jennifer ^a   Li, Tong ^a   Li, Feng Lin ^a   Salnitri, Mattia ^a   Cardoso, Evellin ^a   Giorgini, Paolo ^a   Mylopoulos, John ^a   Pimentel, João ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

evidence based requirements engineering; goal model; model transformation; requirements engineering; systematic literature map; systematic literature survey

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE; SURVEYS;

EVIDENCE-BASED; GOAL MODELING; LITERATURE SURVEY; MODEL TRANSFORMATION; REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS; REQUIREMENTS ELABORATION; SOFTWARE ARTIFACTS; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84906739770     PISSN: 21511349     EISSN: 21511357     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RCIS.2014.6861036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. (2011) istar showcase'11: Exploring the goals of your systems and businesses, practical experiences with i* modeling. [Online]. Available: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/istar/iStarShowcase-Proceedings.pdf
2. F. Alencar, B. Marin, G. Giachetti, O. Pastor, J. Castro, and J. H. Pimentel, "From i* requirements models to conceptual models of a model driven development process," in The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, 2009, vol. 39, pp. 99-114. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 642-05352-8-9
3. D. Amyot and G. Mussbacher, "User requirements notation: the first ten years, the next ten years," Journal of Software, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 747-768, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://ojs.academypublisher.com/ index.php/jsw/article/view/0605747768
4. A. Anton and C. Potts, "The use of goals to surface requirements for evolving systems," in Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1998, pp. 157-166.
5. S. Assar, C. Souveyet, and K. Aljoumaa, "A goal-oriented perspective on approaches to web service discovery," in Proc. of the 36th IEEE Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW12), 2012, pp. 347-352.
6. A. Babar, B. Wong, and A. Gill, "An evaluation of the goal-oriented approaches for modelling strategic alignment concept," in Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS11), 2011, pp. 1-8.
7. L. Bastos and J. Castro, "From requirements to multi-agent architecture using organisational concepts," SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1-7, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/ 10.1145/1082983.1082980
8. P. Bresciani, A. Perini, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, and J. Mylopoulos, "Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology," Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 203-236, 2004.
9. L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, Non-functional requirements in software engineering, ser. International Series in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, vol. 5.
10. K. Czarnecki and S. Helsen, "Classification of model transformation approaches," in Proc. of the 2nd OOPSLA'03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, 2003.
11. A. Dardenne, A. Lamsweerde, and S. Fickas, "Goal-directed requirements acquisition," Science of Computer Programming, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 3-50, 1993.
12. K. Decreus, M. Snoeck, and G. Poels, "Practical challenges for methods transforming i* goal models into business process models," in Proc. of the 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE09), 2009, pp. 15-23.
13. H. Estrada, A. Martínez, and O. Pastor, "Goal-based business modeling oriented towards late requirements generation," in Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER03), 2003, vol. 2813, pp. 277-290. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39648-2- 23
14. M. Galster, A. Eberlein, and M. Moussavi, "Transition from requirements to architecture: A review and future perspective," in Proc. of the 7th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD06), 2006, pp. 9-16.
15. -, "Comparing methodologies for the transition between software requirements and architectures," in IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC09), 2009, pp. 2380-2385.
16. P. Giorgini, F. Massacci, J. Mylopoulos, and N. Zannone, "Modeling security requirements through ownership, permission and delegation," in Proc. of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 2005, 2005, pp. 167-176.
17. D. Harel and B. Rumpe, "Meaningful modeling: What's the semantics of "semantics"?" Computer, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 64-72, Oct. 2004. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2004.172
18. ITU-T and Intern. Telecom. Union: Recommendation Z.151 (11/08), "Recommendation Z.151 (11/08) User Requirements Notation (URN) - Language definition," http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.151/en., ITU-T - International Telecommunications Union, Tech. Rep., 2008.
19. M. Jarke, M. Pham, and R. Klamma, "Evolution of the caise author community: A social network analysis," in Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, 2013, pp. 15-33. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1-2
20. B. Kitchenham, S. Pfleeger, L. Pickard, P. Jones, D. Hoaglin, K. Emam, and J. Rosenberg, "Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 721-734, 2002.
21. B. Kitchenham and P. Brereton, "A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering," Information and Software Technology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2049-2075, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0950584913001560
22. B. Kitchenham, T. Dyba, and M. Jorgensen, "Evidence-based software engineering," in Proc. of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE04), 2004, pp. 273-281. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=998675.999432
23. B. Kitchenham, R. Pretorius, D. Budgen, O. P. Brereton, M. Turner, M. Niazi, and S. Linkman, "Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - a tertiary study," Information and Software Technology, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 792-805, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0950584910000467
24. B. A. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, and O. P. Brereton, "Using mapping studies as the basis for further research - a participant-observer case study," Information and Software Technology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 638-651, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0950584910002272
25. A. Kleppe, J. Warmer, and W. Bast, MDA explained: the model driven architecture: practice and promise. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
26. A. V. Lamsweerde, "Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a roundtrip from research to practice," in Proc. of the 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.67. 6087\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf
27. L. Liu and Z. Jin, "Integrating goals and problem frames in requirements analysis," in Proc. of the 14th IEEE International Conference Requirements Engineering, 2006, pp. 349-350.
28. T. Mens and P. Van Gorp, "A taxonomy of model transformation," Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 152, pp. 125-142, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs. 2005.10.021
29. K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, and M. Mattsson, "Systematic mapping studies in software engineering," in Proc. of the 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE08), 2008, pp. 68-77. [Online]. Available: http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm? id=2227115.2227123
30. M. Pham, R. Klamma, and M. Jarke, "Development of computer science disciplines: a social network analysis approach," Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 321-340, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-011-0024-x
31. C. Seaman, "Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 557-572, 1999.
32. R. Sebastiani, P. Giorgini, and J. Mylopoulos, "Simple and minimumcost satisfiability for goal models," in Advanced Information Systems Engineering, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2004, vol. 3084, pp. 20-35. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-25975-6-4
33. R. Wieringa, N. Maiden, N. Mead, and C. Rolland, "Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion," Requirements Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 102-107, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6
34. E. Yu, "Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering," in Proc. of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, vol. 97, 1997, pp. 226-235.