Erratum: Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (JAMA Surgery DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.31);Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

JAMA Surgery

Volumn 149, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 845-851

  Parsons, J Kellogg ^a,b   Messer, Karen ^c,d   Palazzi, Kerrin ^a   Stroup, Sean P ^e   Chang, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT SAFETY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84906692043     PISSN: 21686254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.31     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Wilson CB. Adoption of new surgical technology. BMJ. 2006;332(7533):112- 114.
2. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al; Balliol Collaboration. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1089-1096.
3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
4. Moul JW.Minimally invasive open retropubic prostatectomy: in experienced hands: still the gold standard. Oncology (Williston Park). 2012;26(7):610-611, 615.
5. Cadeddu JA, Gautam G, Shalhav AL. Robotic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;183(3):858-861.
6. Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, Fowler FJ Jr. Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of Medicare-age men. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(5):513-518.
7. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1557-1564.
8. Hu JC,Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes ofminimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14): 2278-2284.
9. Kang DC, Hardee MJ, Fesperman SF, Stoffs TL, Dahm P. Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature. Eur Urol. 2010;57 (6):930-937.
10. Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72(2):412-416.
11. Ficarra V, Novara G, ArtibaniW, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55 (5):1037-1063.
12. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, et al; Members of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182(3):1126-1132.
13. Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology. 2005;66(5)(suppl):105-107.
14. Goldstraw MA, Challacombe BJ, Patil K, Amoroso P, Dasgupta P, Kirby RS. Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012;15(1):1-7.
15. GladwellM. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York, NY: Little, Brown; 2000.
16. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
17. Chang DC, Handly N, Abdullah F, et al. The occurrence of potential patient safety events among trauma patients: are they random? Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):327-334.
18. Zhan C, MillerMR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003;290 (14):1868-1874.
19. Coffey R, Barrett M, Houchens R, et al. Methods Applying AHRQ Quality Indicators to Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Data for the Sixth National Healthcare Quality Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
20. Romano PS, Geppert JJ, Davies S, MillerMR, Elixhauser A, McDonald KM. A national profile of patient safety in US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22(2):154-166.
21. Houchens R, Elixhauser A. Final Report on Calculating Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Variances, 2001 (Revised June 6, 2006). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001.
22. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383.
23. AHRQ Quality Indicators. Software Documentation [computer program]. Version 4.1a forWindows, 1-912010. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
24. Cropper CM. The robot is in-and ready to operate. BusinessWeek. 2005:110-112.
25. Barrett J. Cutting edge. Newsweek. 2005; 24:50-54.
26. Institute of Medicine. Medical Devices and the Public's Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 Years.Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2011.
27. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Strengthening Our National System for Medical Device Postmarket Surveillance. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2012.
28. Langreth R. Intuitive robot probe threatens trend-setting surgeries. Bloomberg. March 1, 2013. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-28/intuitive- surgical-robots-probed-by-u-s-in-survey-of-surgeons.html. Accessed June 3, 2013.
29. Cooper MA, Ibrahim A, Lyu H, MakaryMA. Underreporting of robotic surgery complications [published online August 27, 2013]. J Healthc Qual.
30. Tseng TY, Cancel QV, Fesperman SF, et al. The role of early adopter bias for new technologies in robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1318-1323.
31. Scandlen G. Commentary: how consumer-driven health care evolves in a dynamic market. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4, pt 2):1113-1118.
32. Russell JC,Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, Lynch JT. Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993: a statewide experience: Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg. 1996;131(4):382-388.
33. Cohen MM, YoungW, ThériaultME, Hernandez R. Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario? CMAJ. 1996;154(4):491-500.
34. LowranceWT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2087-2092.
35. LowranceWT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1366-1372.