Coherence and argumentation

Psychology of Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 267-285

  Green, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906642170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203506936     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Bailenson, J., & Rips, L. J. (1996). Informal reasoning and the burden of proof. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S3-S16.
2. Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 221-235.
3. Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking: An experimental and social study. London: Allen & Unwin.
4. Benthin, A., Slovic, P., Moran, P., Severson, H., Mertz, C. K., & Gerrard, M. (1995). Adolescent health-threatening and health-enhancing behaviors: A study of word association and imagery. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17, 143-152.
5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). When weak explanations prevail. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 468-469.
6. Boninger, D. S., Gleicher, F., & Stratham, A. (1994). Counterfactual thinking: From what might have been to what may be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 297-307.
7. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York:Academic Press.
8. Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible and counterfactual conditionals. Memory and Cognition, 27, 726-740.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
10. Chater, N. (1999). The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 273-302.
11. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12. Feibleman, J. K. (1960). An introduction to Peirce's philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
13. Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Information amplified: Memory for counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 44-49.
14. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
15. Green, D. W. (1994). Induction: Representation, strategy and argument. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 45-50.
16. Green, D. W. (2000). Argument and opinion. In J. García-Madruga, N. Carriedo, & M. J. González-Labra (Eds.), Mental models in reasoning (pp. 57-67). Madrid:UNED.
17. Green, D. W. (2001). A mental model theory of informal argument. Paper presented to the Workshop on The Mental Models Theory of Reasoning: Refinements and Extensions, Brussels.
18. Green, D. W. (in press). Affect and argument. In V. Girotto & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The shape of reason. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
19. Green, D. W., McClelland, A., Muckli, L., & Simmons, C. (1999). Arguments and deontic decisions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 27-47.
20. Green, D. W., & McCloy, R. (2003). Reaching a verdict. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 307-333.
21. Green, D. W., & McManus, I. C. (1995). Cognitive structural models: Perception of risk and prevention in coronary heart disease. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 321-336.
22. Haddock, G. (2002). It's easy to like or dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility experiences and the favourability of attitude judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 257-267.
23. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgement depends on whether the judgement is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
24. Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3-31.
25. Iyengar, S., & Ottati, V. (1994). Cognitive perspective in political psychology. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 143-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
26. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
27. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kruglanski, A. W., & Ajzen, I. (1983). Bias and error in human judgement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 1-44.
29. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
31. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
32. Legrenzi, M. S., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000) Reasoning to consistency: A theory of naive nonmonotonic reasoning.
33. Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1241.
34. MacGregor, D. G., Slovic, P., Dreman, D., & Berry, M. (2000). Imagery, affect, and financial judgment. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1, 104-110.
35. McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Semifactual even if thinking. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 41-67.
36. Oestermeier, U., & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Verbal and visual causal arguments. Cognition, 75, 65-104.
37. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decisionmaking. Cognition, 49, 123-163.
38. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
39. Rips, L. R. (1999). Reasoning and conversation. Psychological Review, 105, 411-441.
40. Russo, J. E., Medvec, V. H., & Meloy, M. G. (1996). The distortion of information during decisions. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 66, 102-110.
41. Shaw, V. (1996). The cognitive processes in informal reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 51-80.
42. Simon, D., Pham, L. B., Le, Q. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001). The emergence of coherence over the course of decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1250-1260.
43. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2001). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Stratham, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Scott Edwards, C. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
45. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-467.
46. Torrens, D., Thompson, V. A., & Cramer, K. M. (1999). Individual differences and the belief bias effect: Mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 5, 1-28.
47. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
49. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendurst, R., Henkemans, F. S., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
50. Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-350.
51. Walton, D. N. (1996). Argument structure: A pragmatic theory. Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press.
52. Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105-1113.
53. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.
54. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.