Production and comprehension measures in assessing plural object formation

The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 151-166

  Sanford, Anthony J ^a   Sturt, Patrick ^a   Moxey, Linda ^a   Morrow, Lorna ^a   Emmott, Cathy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906624568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203509050     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Albrecht, J., & Clifton, C. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory and Cognition, 26, 599-610.
2. Carreiras, M. (1997). Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 53-87.
3. Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (1987). Discourse structure and anaphora: Some experimental results. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 10, (pp. 635-654). London:Erlbaum.
4. Eschenbach, C. C., Habel, C., Herweg., M., & Rehkamper, K. (1989). Remarks on plural anaphora. Proceedings of 4th conference of European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, pp. 161-167.
5. Gordon, P. C., Camblin, C., & Swaab, T. Y. (this volume): Referential Processing: evidence from eyetracking and ERPs.
6. Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389-424.
7. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 353-379.
8. Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203-226.
9. Huitema, J. S. (1989). Pronouns and the representation of discourse. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
10. Kaup, B., Kelter, S., & Habel, C. (2002). Representing referents of plural expressions and resolving plural anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(4), 405-450.
11. Koh, S., & Clifton, C. A. (2002). Resolution of the antecedent of a plural pronoun: Ontological categories and predicate symmetry. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 830-844.
12. Morrow, L. I., Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2003). Canonical ordering and plural reference. Manuscript in preparation.
13. Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Morrow, L. I. (2004). Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse processes, 26, 159-190.
16. Sanford, A. J., & Lockhart, F. (1990). Description types and method of conjoining as factors influencing plural anaphora: A continuation study of focus. Journal of Semantics, 7, 365-378.
17. Sanford, A., Moar, K., & Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of discourse focus. Language and Speech, 31, 43-56.
18. Sanford, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (1995). Notes on plural reference and the scenario-mapping principle in comprehension. In C. Habel & G. Rickheit (Eds.), Focus and cohesion in discourse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.