Expert curation in UniProtKB: A case study on dealing with conflicting and erroneous data

Database

Volumn 2014, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Poux, Sylvain ^a   Magrane, Michele ^b   Arighi, Cecilia N ^c   Bridge, Alan ^a   O'Donovan, Claire ^b   Laiho, Kati ^d  

^a SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^d GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COOPERATION; DATA MINING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN DATABASE; STATISTICS;

AUTOMATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DATA MINING; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84906540969     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/bau016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. The UniProt Consortium. (2014) Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D191-D198.
2. Schnoes, A.M., Brown, S.D., Dodevski, I. et al. (2009) Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, E1000605-E1000605.
3. Skunca, N., Altenhoff, A. and Dessimoz, C. (2012) Quality of computationally inferred gene ontology annotations. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, E1002533-E1002533.
4. Percudani, R., Carnevali, D. and Puggioni, V. (2013) Ureidoglycolate hydrolase, amidohydrolase, lyase: how errors in biological databases are incorporated in scientific papers and vice versa. Database., 2013, Bat071.
5. Nehrt, N.L., Clark, W.T., Radivojac, P. et al. (2011) Testing the ortholog conjecture with comparative functional genomic data from mammals. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7, E1002073-E1002073.
6. Thomas, P.D., Wood, V., Mungall, C.J. et al. (2012) On the use of gene ontology annotations to assess functional similarity among orthologs and paralogs: a short report. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, E1002386-E1002386.
7. Begley, C.G. and Ellis, L.M. (2012) Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature., 483, 531-533.
8. Prinz, F., Schlange, T. and Asadullah, K. (2011) Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 10, 712-712.
9. North, B.J. and Verdin, E. (2004) Sirtuins: Sir2-related NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. Genome Biol., 5, 224-224.
10. Du, J., Zhou, Y., Su, X. et al. (2011) Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science., 334, 806-809.
11. Schlicker, C., Gertz, M., Papatheodorou, P. et al. (2008) Substrates and regulation mechanisms for the human mitochondrial sirtuins Sirt3 and Sirt5. J. Mol. Biol., 382, 790-801.
12. Nakagawa, T., Lomb, D.J., Haigis, M.C. et al. (2009) SIRT5 deacetylates carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 and regulates the urea cycle. Cell., 137, 560-570.
13. Peng, C., Lu, Z., Xie, Z. et al. (2011) The first identification of lysine malonylation substrates and its regulatory enzyme. Mol. Cell. Proteomics., 10, M111.012658-M111.012658.
14. Magrane, M. The UniProt Consortium U. (2011) UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database., 2011, Bar009-Bar009.
15. Zhu, A.Y., Zhou, Y., Khan, S. et al. (2012) Plasmodium falciparum Sir2A preferentially hydrolyzes medium and long chain fatty acyl lysine. ACS Chem. Biol., 7, 155-159.
16. Nakamura, Y., Ogura, M., Ogura, K. et al. (2012) SIRT5 deacetylates and activates urate oxidase in liver mitochondria of mice. FEBS Lett., 586, 4076-4081.
17. Rauh, D., Fischer, F., Gertz, M. et al. (2013) An acetylome peptide microarray reveals specificities and deacetylation substrates for all human sirtuin isoforms. Nat. Commun., 4, 2327-2327.
18. Flicek, P., Amode, M.R., Barrell, D. et al. (2014) Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D749-D755.
19. Pruitt, K.D., Brown, G.R., Hiatt, S.M. et al. (2014) RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D756-D763.
20. Cherry, J.M., Hong, E.L., Amundsen, C. et al. (2012) Saccharomyces genome database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D700-D705.
21. Klimke, W., O'Donovan, C., White, O. et al. (2011) Solving the problem: genome annotation standards before the data deluge. Stand. Genomic Sci., 5, 168-193.
22. Dimmer, E.C., Huntley, R.P., Alam-Faruque, Y. et al. (2012) The UniProt-GO annotation database in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D565-D570.
23. Garavelli, J.S. (2004) The RESID database of protein modifications as a resource and annotation tool. Proteomics., 4, 1527-1533.
24. Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Beavis, R., Binz, P.A. et al. (2008) The PSI-MOD community standard for representation of protein modification data. Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 864-866.
25. McDonald, A.G. and Tipton, K.F. (2013) Fifty-five years of enzyme classification: advances and difficulties. FEBS J., 281, 583-592.
26. Pedruzzi, I., Rivoire, C., Auchincloss, A.H. et al. (2013) HAMAP in 2013, new developments in the protein family classification and annotation system. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D584-D589.
27. Enhancing reproducibility. (2013) Nat. Methods, 10, 367-367.