Random intercept EFA of personality scales

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 53, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-4

  Aichholzer, Julian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Acquiescence; BFI; Big Five; ESEM; Factor analysis; NEO FFI; Simple structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906516671     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aichholzer Julian (submitted for publication). Testing complex factor structure and individual method bias with random intercept EFA. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
2. Anusic I., Schimmack U., Pinkus R.T., Lockwood P. The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97(6):1142-1156.
3. Asparouhov T., Muthén B.O. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 2009, 16(3):397-438.
4. Billiet J.B., McClendon M.J. Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items. Structural Equation Modeling 2000, 7(4):608-628.
5. Booth, T., & Hughes, D. J. (in press). Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191114528029.
6. Borkenau P., Ostendorf F. Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 1990, 11(5):515-524.
7. Borkenau P., Ostendorf F. NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae 1993, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
8. Herrmann A., Pfister H.-R. Simple measures and complex structures: Is it worth employing a more complex model of personality in Big Five inventories?. Journal of Research in Personality 2013, 47(5):599-608.
9. Hopwood C.J., Donnellan M.B. How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010, 14(3):332-346.
10. Marsh H.W., Hau K.-T., Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 2004, 11(3):320-341.
11. Marsh H.W., Lüdtke O., Muthén B.O., Asparouhov T., Morin A.J.S., Trautwein U. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment 2010, 22(3):471-491.
12. Maydeu-Olivares A., Coffman D.L. Random intercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods 2006, 11(4):344-362.
13. McCrae R.R., Herbst J.H., Costa P.T. Effects of acquiescence on personality factor structures. Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure 2001, 217-231. Pabst, Berlin. R. Riemann, F.M. Spinath, F. Ostendorf (Eds.).
14. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7 ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
15. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology 2012, 63:539-569.
16. Rammstedt B., Farmer R.F. The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment 2013, 25(4):1137-1145.
17. Rammstedt B., Goldberg L.R., Borg I. The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. Journal of Research in Personality 2010, 44(1):53-61.
18. Rammstedt B., John O.P. Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K). Diagnostica 2005, 51(4):195-206.
19. Schumann, S. (2004). Personality and voting behaviour 2003. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive (ZA4052 Data file Version 1.0.0).