Bioelectricity generation in an integrated system combining microbial fuel cell and tubular membrane reactor: Effects of operation parameters performing a microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for tubular membrane bioreactor

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 170, Issue , 2014, Pages 483-490

  Wang, Jie ^a   Zheng, Yawen ^a   Jia, Hui ^a   Zhang, Hongwei ^a  

^a TIANJIN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bio cathode microbial fuel cell; Biosensor; COD; Membrane reactor

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; BIOSENSORS; CATHODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FUEL CELLS; INTEGRATED CONTROL; MEMBRANES;

BIOCATHODES; CELL-BASED BIOSENSOR; COD; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; MEMBRANE REACTOR; OPERATION PARAMETERS; REAL TIME MONITORING; REGRESSION COEFFICIENT; INVERSE RELATIONSHIP;

MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS;

BIOENERGY; BIOREACTOR; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; FUEL CELL; LINEAR PROGRAMING; MASS TRANSFER; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; PARAMETERIZATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MEMBRANE; MONITORING SYSTEM; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; SENSOR;

AERATION; ANODE POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOENERGY; BIOFOULING; BIOSENSOR; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; FILTRATION; FLOW RATE; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL; MONITORING; PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON TRANSPORT; SLUDGE; TEMPERATURE; TUBULAR MEMBRANE REACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ONLINE MONITORING; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR; GENETIC PROCEDURES; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE;

BIOELECTRIC ENERGY SOURCES; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; ELECTRODES; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 84906504613     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.033     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aldrovandi A., Marsili E., Stante L., Paganin P., Tabacchioni S., Giordano A. Sustainable power production in a membrane-less and mediator-less synthetic wastewater microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3252-3260.
2. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, APHA, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
3. Chang I.S., Jang J.K., Gil G.C., Kim M., Kim H.J., Cho B.W., Kim B.H. Continuous determination of biochemical oxygen demand using microbial fuel cell type biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19:607-613.
4. Chang I.S., Moon H., Jang J.K., Kim B.H. Improvement of a microbial fuel cell performance as BOD sensor using respiratory inhibitors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20:1856-1859.
5. Chee G.J., Nomura Y., Ikebukuro K., Karube I. Development of pHotocatalytic biosensor for the evaluation of biochemical oxygen demand. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21:67-73.
6. Di Lorenzo M., Curtis T.P., Head I.M., Scott K. A single-chamber microbial fuel cell as a biosensor for wastewaters. Water Res. 2009, 43:3145-3154.
7. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28:350-356.
8. Feng, Y., Currie, C., Harper, W.F., 2011. Metrics Related to the Responsiveness of Biosensing Microbial Fuel Cells. 84th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exposition and Conference. Los Angeles, CA.
9. Feng Y.H., Barr W., Harper W.F. Neural network processing of microbial fuel cell signals for the identification of chemicals present in water. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 120:84-92.
10. Huang Z., Ong S.L., Ng H.Y. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res. 2011, 45:705-713.
11. Hyun C.K., Tamiya E., Takeuchi T., Karube I., Inoue N. Novel BOD sensor based on bacterial luminescence. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 41:1107-1111.
12. Ketep S.F., Fourest E., Bergel A. Experimental and theoretical characterization of microbial bioanodes formed in pulp and paper mill effluent in electrochemically controlled conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 149:117-125.
13. Kim B.H., Chang I.S., Gil G.C., Park H.S., Kim H.J. Novel BOD sensor using mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biotechnol. Lett. 2003, 25:541-545.
14. Kim M., Youn S.M., Shin S.H., Jang J.G., Han S.H., Hyun M.S., Gadd G.M., Kim H.J. Practical field application of a novel BOD monitoring system. J. Environ. Monit. 2003, 5:640-643.
15. Kim M., Hyun M.S., Gadd G.M., Kim H.J. A novel biomonitoring system using microbial fuel cells. J. Environ. Monit. 2007, 9:1323-1328.
16. Kumlanghan A., Liu J., Thavarungkul P., Kanatharana P., Mattiasson B. Microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for fast analysis of biodegradable organic matter. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22:2939-2944.
17. Lee J.H., Mitchell R.J., Kim B.C., Cullen D.C., Gu M.B. A cell array biosensor for environmental toxicity analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21:500-507.
18. Lee H.S., Parameswaran P., Kato-Marcus A., Torres C.I., Rittmann B.E. Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates. Water Res. 2007, 42:1501-1510.
19. Li X.Y., Yang S.F. Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the flocculation, sedimentation and dewaterability of activated sludge. Water Res. 2007, 41:1022-1030.
20. Lin H.J., Xie K., Mahendran B., Bagley D.M., Leung K.T., Liss S.N., Liao B.Q. Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Res. 2009, 43:3827-3837.
21. Liu X.W., Wang Y.P., Huang Y.X., Sun X.F., Sheng G.P., Zeng R.J., et al. Integration of a microbial fuel cell with activated sludge process for energy-saving wastewater treatment: taking a sequencing batch reactor as an example. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:1260-1267.
22. Logan B.E. Microbial Fuel Cells 2008, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
23. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin pHenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193:265-275.
24. Modin O., Wilen B.M. A novel bioelectrochemical BOD sensor operating with voltage input. Water Res. 2012, 46:6113-6120.
25. Shan X., Peng L., Yang C., Xue X., Xia H. Simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal using an oxic/anoxic-biocathode microbial fuel cells coupled system. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:348-354.
26. Shen Y.J., Lefebvre O., Tan Z., Ng H.Y. Microbial fuel-cell-based toxicity sensor for fast monitoring of acidic toxicity. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 65:1223-1228.
27. Sheng G.P., Yu H.Q., Li X.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28:882-894.
28. Stein N.E., Hamelers H.V.M., Buisman C.N.J. Stabilizing the baseline current of a microbial fuel cell-based biosensor through overpotential control under non-toxic conditions. Bioelectrochemistry 2010, 78:87-91.
29. Su L., Jia W.Z., Hou C.J., Lei Y. Microbial biosensors: a review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26:1788-1899.
30. Su X.Y., Tian Y., Sun Z.C., Lu Y.B., Li Z.P. Performance of a combined system of microbial fuel cell and membrane bioreactor: wastewater treatment, sludge reduction, energy recovery and membrane fouling. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 49:92-98.
31. Tront J.M., Fortner J.D., Plotze M., Hughes J.B., Puzrin A.M. Microbial fuel cell biosensor for in situ assessment of microbial activity. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 24:586-590.
32. Wang J., Zheng Y.W., Jia H., Zhang H.W. In situ investigation of processing property in combination with integration of microbial fuel cell and tubular membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 149:163-168.
33. You S.J., Zhao Q.L., Zhang J.N., Jiang J.Q., Wan C.L., Du M.A., et al. A grapHite-granule membrane-less tubular air-cathode microbial fuel cell for power generation under continuously operational conditions. J. Power Sources 2007, 173:172-177.
34. Zhang Y.F., Angelidaki I. A simple and rapid method for monitoring dissolved oxygen in water with a submersible microbial fuel cell (SBMFC). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 38:189-194.