New cepstral methods of signal pre-processing for operational modal analysis

International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering 2012, ISMA 2012, including USD 2012: International Conference on Uncertainty in Structure Dynamics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 755-764

  Randall, R B ^a   Peeters, B ^b   Antoni, J ^c   Manzato, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b LMS INTERNATIONAL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HARMONIC ANALYSIS; IMPULSE RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS; IMPULSE RESPONSE MEASUREMENTS; MASKING SIGNALS; OPERATING CONDITION; OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS; RELATIVE STRENGTH; RESPONSE SIGNAL; SYSTEM PROPERTY;

MODAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84906343585     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. R.B. Randall, N. Sawalhi and M. Coats, A Comparison of Methods for Separation of Deterministic and Random Signals, International Journal of Condition Monitoring, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.11-19 (2011).
2. B. Peeters, B. Cornelis, K. Janssens, H. Van der Auweraer, Removing Disturbing Harmonics in Operational Modal Analysis, IOMAC conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2007).
3. B.P. Bogert, M.J.R. Healy and J.W. Tukey, The Quefrency Alanysis of Time series for Echoes: Cepstrum, Pseudo-Autocovariance, Cross-Cepstrum, and Saphe Cracking. In Proc.of the Symp. on Time Series Analysis, by M. Rosenblatt (Ed.), Wiley, NY, pp.209-243 (1963).
4. D.G. Childers, D.P. Skinner and R.C. Kemerait, The Cepstrum: a Guide to Processing, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 6, Issue 10, pp.1428-1443 (1977).