Rawls and Global Justice

Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 227-256

  Pogge, Thomas ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906316286     PISSN: 00455091     EISSN: 19110820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00455091.1988.10717175     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. KCMT, 550. Compare also BSS, 58, and especially John Rawls, ‘A Kantian Conception of Equality’ (Cambridge Review [1975], 94–9), 98f.
2. Rawls relies here on the seminal but somewhat dated account by James L. Brierly, The Law of Nations (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1963 [1928]).
3. John Rawls: ‘Fairness to Goodness’ (Philosophical Review 84 [1975], 536-54), 545
4. Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books 1977), esp. 53f;
5. cf. A.K. Sen, Poverty and Famines (New York: Oxford University Press 1981).
6. Immanuel Kant, ‘Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View,’ in Kant on History, L.W. Beck, ed. (New York: Bobbs-Merrill 1963), 24
7. See Beitz, 165, for the idea of minimal interaction (trading apples and pears). Peter Danielson suggests a theory of global justice as rational cooperation; see Theories, Intuition, and the Problem of World-Wide Distributive Justice,’ in Philosophy and the Social Sciences 3 (1973), 331-40.
8. John Rawls, ‘Reply to Alexander and Musgrave,’ in Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974), 634. Twelve conditions for well-orderedness are listed ibid., 634-6.
9. Cf. JFPM, 246-51, and John Rawls, ‘The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,’ in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7 (1987), 1-25.
10. Cf. Charles Beitz, ’Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment,’ in Journal of Philosophy 80 (1983) 591-600, esp. 596.