Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 764-771

  Krist, Alex H ^a   Beasley, John W ^b   Crosson, Jesse C ^c   Kibbe, David C ^d   Klinkman, Michael S ^e   Lehmann, Christoph U ^f   Fox, Chester H ^g   Mitchell, Jason M ^d   Mold, James W ^h   Pace, Wilson D ⁱ   Peterson, Kevin A ^j   Phillips, Robert L ^k   Post, Robert ^l   Puro, Jon ^m   Raddock, Michael ⁿ   Simkus, Ray ^o   Waldren, Steven E ^d  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

^d AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^k American Board Family Medicine   (United States)

^l Department of Family Medicine Virtua Health ^*  (United States)

^m OCHIN Inc   (United States)

ⁿ METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^o Brookswood Family Practice   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSENSUS; COOPERATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FAMILY; FAMILY STRUCTURE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH HAZARD; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; MEANINGFUL USE; PRIMARY CARE;

CONSENSUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84906308087     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002229     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52.
2. Holroyd-Leduc JM, Lorenzetti D, Straus SE, et al. The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:732-7.
3. Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA, et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:457-64.
4. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 2009 [cited 2012 Apr]. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1:
5. Steinbrook R. Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1057-60.
6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Official Web Site for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. 2012. [cited 2012 Apr]. https://www.cms.gov/ ehrincentiveprograms/
7. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-4.
8. Ackerman K. Heavy hitters hit HIMSS stages to stump for health IT, 2011. [cited 2012 Mar]. http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/heavy-hitters-hit-himss-stagesto- stump-for-health-it.aspx
9. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs: milestone timeline. [cited 2012 Sept]. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/ EHRIncentProgtimeline508V1.pdf
10. Health IT Strategic Plan 2011-2015. 2011 [cited 2011 May]. http://healthit.hhs. gov/StrategicPlan.
11. Electronic health records and meaningful use. 2012. [cited 2012 Feb]. http:// healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=2996&mode=2
12. Seidman J, Tagalicod R. Public input shaped the guiding principles for stage 2 meaningful use NPRM. HealthIT Buzz, 2012.
13. Bitton A, Flier LA, Jha AK. Health information technology in the era of care delivery reform: to what end? JAMA 2012;307:2593-4.
14. Palfrey JS, Sofis LA, Davidson EJ, et al. The Pediatric Alliance for Coordinated Care: evaluation of a medical home model. Pediatrics 2004;113(5 Suppl):1507-16.
15. HealthIT.gov. Health IT Policy Committee-Accountable Care. 2013. [cited 2013 October]. http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/federal-advisorycommittees-facas/accountable-care
16. Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, et al. Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
17. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005;83:457-502.
18. White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med 1961;265:885-92.
19. Green LA, Fryer GE Jr, Yawn BP, et al. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med 2001;344:2021-5.
20. Hsiao C-J. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.). Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, 2011.
21. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Doctors and hospitals' use of health IT more than doubles since 2012. 2013. [cited 2013 October]. http://www.hhs.gov/ news/press/2013pres/05/20130522a.html
22. Edsall RL, Adler KG. User satisfaction with EHRs: report of a survey of 422 family physicians. Fam Pract Manag 2008;15:25-32.
23. Beasley JW, Wetterneck TB, Temte J, et al. Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:745-51.
24. Fiegel C. Stage 2 meaningful use rules sharply criticized by physicians. American Medical News. 2012 May 21.
25. Lewis Dolan P. EHRs: A love-hate relationship. American Medical News. 2012 May 21.
26. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program-Stage 2. In: Federal Register Vol. 77 No. 45, editor. 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, and 495; 2012.
27. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home. 2009. [cited 2011 May]. http://www.pcpcc.net/
28. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996;74:511-44.
29. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:64-78.
30. Devers K, Berenson RA. Can accountable care organizations improve the value of health care by solving the cost and quality quandries? Urban Institute. [cited 2012 Sept]. http://www.urban.org/publications/411975.html
31. Tagalicod R, Reider J. Progress on adoption of electronic health records. CMS.gov. 2013. [cited 2013 Dec]. http://www.cms.gov/eHealth/ListServ_Stage3Implementation.html
32. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals. [cited 2012 Sep]. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Stage1vsStage2CompTablesforEP.pdf
33. Lown BA, Rodriguez D. Commentary: Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning. Acad Med 2012;87:392-4.
34. Toll E. A piece of my mind. The cost of technology. JAMA 2012;307: 2497-8.
35. Borkan J, Eaton CB, Novillo-Ortiz D, et al. Renewing primary care: lessons learned from the Spanish health care system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1432-41.
36. Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, et al. Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;20:727-35.
37. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, et al. How Common Are Electronic Health Records In The United States? A Summary of the Evidence. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25: w496-507.
38. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008;359:50-60.
39. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.
40. Phillips RL, Klinkman MS, Green L. Harmonizing primary care: clinical classification and data standards. Washington, DC: American Academy of Family Physicians, 2007.
41. Lamberts H, Hofmans-Okkes I. Episode of care: a core concept in family practice. J Fam Pract 1996;42:161-9.
42. Okkes IM, Oskam SK, Lamberts H. The probability of specific diagnoses for patients presenting with common symptoms to Dutch family physicians. J Fam Pract 2002;51:31-6.
43. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, et al. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:217-24.
44. Cassel CK, Guest JA. Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA 2012;307:1801-2.
45. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med 2004;26:56-66.
46. Krist AH, Woolf SH. A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA 2011;305:300-1.
47. Estabrooks PA, Boyle M, Emmons KM, et al. Harmonized patient-reported data elements in the electronic health record: supporting meaningful use by primary care action on health behaviors and key psychosocial factors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:575-82.
48. Mold JW, Blake GH, Becker LA. Goal-oriented medical care. Fam Med 1991;23: 46-51.
49. Reuben DB, Tinetti ME. Goal-oriented patient care--an alternative health outcomes paradigm. N Engl J Med 2012;366:777-9.
50. Klinkman M, van Weel C. Prospects for person-centred diagnosis in general medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17:365-70.
51. Riedmann D, Jung M, Hackl WO, et al. How to improve the delivery of medication alerts within computerized physician order entry systems: an international Delphi study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:760-6.
52. Jung M, Hoerbst A, Hackl WO, et al. Attitude of Physicians Towards Automatic Alerting in Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems. A Comparative International Survey. Methods Inf Med 2012;52
53. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. IS 2011;6:92.
54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. 2012. [cited 2013 Jan]. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx
55. The National Prevention Strategy. 2011. [cited 2011 July]. http://www.healthcare. gov/center/councils/nphpphc/index.html
56. Health eDecisions Standards and Interoperability Framework Initiative. [cited 2013 October]. http://wiki.siframework.org/Health+eDecisions+Homepage
57. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician Quality Reporting System. 2012. [cited 2013 Jan]. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/index.html
58. American Board of Medical Specialties. ABMS Maintenance of Certification. 2012. [cited 2013 Jan]. http://www.abms.org/maintenance_of_certification/ABMS_MOC.aspx
59. HITSP summary documents using HL7 continuity of care document (CCD) component 32. New York (NY): HITSP (US): United States. Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP). 2009 Jul 08. Version 2.5.
60. ASTM International. Standard Specification for the Continuity of Care Record. 2012. [cited 2013 Jan]. http://www.astm.org/Standards/E2369.htm
61. Kuzel AJ. Ten steps to a patient-centered medical home. Fam Pract Manag 2009;16:18-24.