Principal Choice and Teacher Participation in Site-Based Management: Four Schools Implement One Policy

Learning to Lead Together: The Promise and Challenge of Sharing Leadership

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 255-281

  David Brazer, S ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906286062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452232416.n9     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Beck, L. G., & Murphy, J. (1996). The four imperatives of a successful school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2. Elmore, R. F. (1993). School decentralization: Who gains? Who loses? In J.Hannaway & M.Carnoy (Eds.) Decentralization and school performance (pp. 33-54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Haskin, K.A process of learning: The principal’s role in participatory management. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (San Francisco, April 18-22, 1995).
4. Johnson, P., & Logan, J. (2000). Efficacy and productivity: The future of school-based decision-making councils in Kentucky. Journal of School Leadership, 10(4), 311-331.
5. Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998), A review of research concerning the implementation of site-based management. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 233-285. doi:10.1080/0924345980090301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090301
6. March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making. New York: The Free Press.
7. Mohrman, S. A. (1994). High involvement management in the private sector. In S. A.Mohrman & P.Wohlstetter (Eds.) School-based management: Organizing for high performance (pp. 25-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Mohrman, S. A., & Wohlstetter, P. (1994). Introduction: Improving school performance. In S. A.Mohrman & P.Wohlstetter (Eds.) School-based management: Organizing for high performance (pp. 1-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Murphy, J., & Beck, L. G. (1995). School-based management as school reform: Taking stock. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10. Neal, R. G. (n.d.). School based management: An effective approach to reform. Executive summary. Written report. Prince William County Public Schools, Virginia.
11. Ogawa, R. T., & White, P. A. (1994). School-based management: An overview. In S. A.Mohrman & P.Wohlstetter. (Eds.) School-based management: Organizing for high performance (pp. 53-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Prince William County Public Schools, Virginia. (1990). Executive summary.
13. Robertson, P., & Briggs, K. (1998), Improving schools through school-based management: An examination of the process of change. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1), 28-57. doi:10.1080/0924345980090102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090102
14. Tyack, D. (1993). School governance in the United States: Historical puzzles and anomalies. In J.Hannaway & M.Carnoy (Eds.) Decentralization and school performance (pp. 1-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Weiss, C. H. (1995). The four "I’s" of school reform: How interests, ideology, information, and institution affect teachers and principals. Harvard Educational Review, 65(4), 571-592.
16. Winter, P. A., Keedy, J. L., & Newton, R. M. (2000). Teachers serving on school decision-making councils: Predictors of teacher attraction to the job. Journal of School Leadership, 10(3), 248-263.
17. Wohlstetter, P., & Mohrman, S. A. (1994). Establishing the conditions for high performance. In S. A.Mohrman & P.Wohlstetter. (Eds.) School-based management: Organizing for high performance (pp. 165-183). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Wohlstetter, P., & Odden, A. (1992). Rethinking school-based management policy and research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(4), 429-549. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028004005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X92028004005