Historical mercury releases from commercial products: Global environmental implications

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 48, Issue 17, 2014, Pages 10242-10250

  Horowitz, Hannah M ^a   Jacob, Daniel J ^a,b   Amos, Helen M ^d   Streets, David G ^c   Sunderland, Elsie M ^b,d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUELS; LAND FILL; MERCURY (METAL); WASTE INCINERATION;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES; ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATION; ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION; BIOGEOCHEMICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE; ENVIRONMENTAL RESERVOIRS; FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION;

RESERVOIRS (WATER);

ATMOSPHERE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; INTERNATIONALITY; MERCURY; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84906232259     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es501337j     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Mahaffey, K. R.; Sunderland, E. M.; Chan, H. M.; Choi, A. L.; Grandjean, P.; Marien, K.; Oken, E.; Sakamoto, M.; Schoeny, R.; Weihe, P.; Yan, C. H.; Yasutake, A. Balancing the benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risks of methylmercury exposure from fish consumption Nutr. Rev. 2011, 69 (9) 493-508
2. Karagas, M. R.; Choi, A. L.; Oken, E.; Horvat, M.; Schoeny, R.; Kamai, E.; Cowell, W.; Grandjean, P.; Korrick, S. Evidence on the human health effects of low-level methylmercury exposure Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120 (6) 799-806
3. Nriagu, J. O. Production and uses of mercury. In The biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment; Nriagu, J. O., Ed.; Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedial Press: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1979; pp 23-40.
4. Amos, H. M.; Jacob, D. J.; Streets, D. G.; Sunderland, E. M. Legacy impacts of all-time anthropogenic emissions on the global mercury cycle Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2013, 27 (2) 410-421
5. Fitzgerald, W. F.; Engstrom, D. R.; Mason, R. P.; Nater, E. A. The case for atmospheric mercury contamination in remote areas Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32 (1) 1-7
6. Serrano, O.; Martinez-Cortizas, A.; Mateo, M. A.; Biester, H.; Bindler, R. Millennial scale impact on the marine biogeochemical cycle of mercury from early mining on the Iberian Peninsula Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2013, 27 (1) 21-30
7. Mason, R. P.; Fitzgerald, W. F.; Morel, F. M. M. The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: Anthropogenic influences Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58 (15) 3191-3198
8. Selin, N. E.; Jacob, D. J.; Yantosca, R. M.; Strode, S.; Jaegle, L.; Sunderland, E. M. Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2008, 22, 2
9. Slemr, F.; Schuster, G.; Seiler, W. Distribution, speciation, and budget of atmospheric mercury J. Atmos Chem. 1985, 3 (4) 407-434
10. Andren, M. O.; Nriagu, J. O. The global cycle of mercury. In The biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment; Nriagu, J. O., Ed.; Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedial Press: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1979; pp 1-15.
11. Minamata Convention on Mercury: Text and Annexes; United Nations Environment Programme: Geneva, 2013; http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Portals/ 11/documents/Booklets/Minamata%20Convention%20on%20Mercury-booklet-English.pdf.
12. Streets, D. G.; Devane, M. K.; Lu, Z.; Bond, T. C.; Sunderland, E. M.; Jacob, D. J. All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (24) 10485-10491
13. Jasinski, S. M. The materials flow of mercury in the United States; Bureau of Mines Information Circular IC 9412; U.S. Department of the Interior: Washington, DC, 1994.
14. Substance Flow Analysis of Mercury in Products; Barr Engineering: Minneapolis, MN, August 15, 2001.
15. Assessment of Mercury Releases from the Russian Federation; Arctic Council Action Plan to Eliminate Pollution of the Arctic (ACAP), Russian Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Atomic Supervision and Danish Environmental Protection Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
16. Cain, A.; Disch, S.; Twaroski, C.; Reindl, J.; Case, C. R. Substance flow analysis of mercury intentionally used in products in the United States J. Ind. Ecol. 2007, 11 (3) 61-75
17. Kindbom, K.; Munthe, J. Product-related emissions of mercury to air in the European Union; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd.: Göteborg, Sweden, 2007.
18. Pacyna, E. G.; Pacyna, J. M.; Sundseth, K.; Munthe, J.; Kindbom, K.; Wilson, S.; Steenhuisen, F.; Maxson, P. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020 Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44 (20) 2487-2499
19. Pirrone, N.; Cinnirella, S.; Feng, X.; Finkelman, R. B.; Friedli, H. R.; Leaner, J.; Mason, R.; Mukherjee, A. B.; Stracher, G. B.; Streets, D. G.; Telmer, K. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10 (13) 5951-5964
20. Wilson, S.; Munthe, J.; Sundseth, K.; Kindbom, K.; Maxson, P.; Pacyna, J. M.; Steenhuisen, F. Updating Historical Global Inventories of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions to Air; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP): Oslo, Norway, 2010.
21. Sundseth, K.; Pacyna, J.; Pacyna, E.; Panasiuk, D. Substance flow analysis of mercury affecting water quality in the European Union Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2011, 1-14
22. Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
23. Chakraborty, L. B.; Qureshi, A.; Vadenbo, C.; Hellweg, S. Anthropogenic mercury flows in India and impacts of emission controls Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (15) 8105-8113
24. Taylor, C. G. The loss of mercury from fungicidal paints J. Appl. Chem. 1965, 232-236
25. DItri, P. A.; DItri, F. M. Mercury Contamination: A Human Tragedy; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1977.
26. Rudd, J. W. M.; Turner, M. A.; Furutani, A.; Swick, A. L.; Townsend, B. E. The English Wabigoon River System 0.1. A synthesis of recent research with a view towards mercury amelioration Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1983, 40 (12) 2206-2217
27. Gill, G. A.; Bloom, N. S.; Cappellino, S.; Driscoll, C. T.; Dobbs, C.; McShea, L.; Mason, R.; Rudd, J. W. M. Sediment-water fluxes of mercury in Lavaca Bay, Texas Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33 (5) 663-669
28. Kocman, D.; Horvat, M.; Pirrone, N.; Cinnirella, S. Contribution of contaminated sites to the global mercury budget Environ. Res. 2013, 125, 160-170
29. Rissanen, K.; Miettinen, J. K. Use of mercury compounds in agriculture and its implications. In Mercury contamination in man and his environment: A joint undertaking by the International Labor Organisation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, The World Health Organization and the International Atomic Energy Agency; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 1972.
30. Characterization of Products Containing Mercury in Muncipal Solid Waste in the United States, 1970 to 2000; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Municipal and Industrial Solid Waste Division: Washington, DC, 1992.
31. Li, Z. G.; Feng, X.; Li, P.; Liang, L.; Tang, S. L.; Wang, S. F.; Fu, X. W.; Qiu, G. L.; Shang, L. H. Emissions of air-borne mercury from five municipal solid waste landfills in Guiyang and Wuhan, China Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10 (7) 3353-3364
32. Brooks, W. E.; Matos, G. R. Mercury recycling in the United States in 2000. In Flow studies for recycling metal commodities in the United States; U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1196-U; Sibley, S. F., comp., Ed.; USGS: Reston, VA, 2005; p 21.
33. Kamman, N. C.; Engstrom, D. R. Historical and present fluxes of mercury to Vermont and New Hampshire lakes inferred from Pb-210 dated sediment cores Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36 (10) 1599-1609
34. Engstrom, D. R.; Balogh, S. J.; Swain, E. B. History of mercury inputs to Minnesota lakes: Influences of watershed disturbance and localized atmospheric deposition Limnol. Oceanogr. 2007, 52 (6) 2467-2483
35. Fain, X.; Ferrari, C. P.; Dommergue, A.; Albert, M. R.; Battle, M.; Severinghaus, J.; Arnaud, L.; Barnola, J. M.; Cairns, W.; Barbante, C.; Boutron, C. Polar firn air reveals large-scale impact of anthropogenic mercury emissions during the 1970s Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106 (38) 16114-16119
36. Allan, M.; Le Roux, G.; Sonke, J. E.; Piotrowska, N.; Streel, M.; Fagel, N. Reconstructing historical atmospheric mercury deposition in Western Europe using: Misten peat bog cores, Belgium Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 442, 290-301
37. Slemr, F.; Brunke, E. G.; Ebinghaus, R.; Kuss, J. Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1995 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11 (10) 4779-4787
38. Soerensen, A. L.; Jacob, D. J.; Streets, D. G.; Witt, M. L. I.; Ebinghaus, R.; Mason, R. P.; Andersson, M.; Sunderland, E. M. Multi-decadal decline of mercury in the North Atlantic atmosphere explained by changing subsurface seawater concentrations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053736.
39. Hylander, L. D.; Meili, M. 500 years of mercury production: Global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 304 (1-3) 13-27
40. Kelly, T. D.; Matos, G. R., Eds. Mercury statistics. In Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States; U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 140, USGS: Reston, VA, 2012; accessed September 25, 2013, at http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/140/.
41. Maxson, P. Mercury flows in Europe and the world: The impact of decommissioned chlor-alkali plants; Concorde East/West Sprl for the European Commission Environment Directorate-General: Brussels, Belgium, February, 2004.
42. Technical Background Report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme/UNEP Chemicals Branch: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
43. Mineral Resources of the United States; U.S. Geological Survey/Bureau of Mines, US Department of the Interior, Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1882,-1929.
44. Minerals Yearbook; US Bureau of Mines, US Department of the Interior, Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1941,-1968.
45. Emerson, D. G. The industrial uses of mercury. In I congreso internacional del mercurio, Barcelona, Spain, 6-10 May, 1974; Fabrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre: Barcelona, Spain, 1974; pp 29-37.
46. Hylander, L. D.; Meili, M. The rise and fall of mercury: Converting a resource to refuse after 500 years of mining and pollution Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 35 (1) 1-36
47. GDP and its breakdown at constant 2005 prices in US dollars-All countries and regions/subregions (totals) for all years. In National Accounts Main Aggregates Database; United Nations Statistics Division: New York, 2012.
48. Metal statistics; American Metal Mart: New York, 1960,-1995.
49. Arenholt-Bindslev, D. Environmental aspects of dental filling materials Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1998, 106 (2) 713-720
50. Mercury Study Report to Congress Vol. II: An Inventory of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States; Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards and Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, December, 1997.
51. Floyd, P.; Zarogiannis, P.; Crane, M.; Tarkowski, S.; Bencko, V. Risks to health and the environment related to the use of mercury products; Risk & Policy Analysts for the European Commission, DG Enterprise: Norfolk, UK, 2002.
52. Hagreen, L. A.; Lourie, B. A. Canadian mercury inventories: The missing pieces Environ. Res. 2004, 95 (3) 272-281
53. Report on the major mercury-containing products and processes, their substitutes and experience in switching to mercury-free products and processes; UNEP(DTIE)/Hg/OEWG.2/7/Add.1; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
54. World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Vol. I: Comprehensive Tables; ST/ESA/SER.A/313; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division: New York, 2011.
55. NRDC submission to UNEP in response to March 2006 request for information on mercury supply, demand, and trade; National Resources Defense Council (NRDC): Washington, DC, May, 2006.
56. Toolkit for Identification and Quantification of Mercury Sources, Reference Report and Guideline for Inventory Level 2, Version 1.2, April 2013; UNEP Chemicals Branch: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
57. Amos, H. M.; Jacob, D. J.; Kocman, D.; Horowitz, H. M.; Zhang, Y.; Dutkiewicz, S.; Horvat, M.; Corbitt, E. S.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Sunderland, E. M. Global biogeochemical implications of mercury discharges from rivers and sediment burial Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 9514-9522
58. Li, Z.; Feng, X. Balance of Mercury in a Modern Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in China. In Air and Waste Management Association International Specialty Conference, Xian, China, May 10-14, 2010.
59. Zhu, W.; Li, Z. G.; Chai, X. L.; Hao, Y. X.; Lin, C. J.; Sommar, J.; Feng, X. B. Emission characteristics and air-surface exchange of gaseous mercury at the largest active landfill in Asia Atmos. Environ. 2013, 79, 188-197
60. Lindberg, S. E.; Southworth, G. R.; Bogle, M. A.; Blasing, T. J.; Owens, J.; Roy, K.; Zhang, H.; Kuiken, T.; Price, J.; Reinhart, D.; Sfeir, H. Airborne emissions of mercury from municipal solid waste. I: New measurements from six operating landfills in Florida J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55 (7) 859-869
61. Kim, S.; Karl, T.; Guenther, A.; Tyndall, G.; Orlando, J.; Harley, P.; Rasmussen, R.; Apel, E. Emissions and ambient distributions of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) in a ponderosa pine ecosystem: Interpretation of PTR-MS mass spectra Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10 (4) 1759-1771
62. Kocman, D.; Horvat, M.; A Global Inventory of Present-Day Mercury Releases to Aquatic Environments, to be submitted for publication.
63. Knightes, C. D.; Sunderland, E. M.; Barber, M. C.; Johnston, J. M.; Ambrose, R. B. Application of ecosystem-scale fate and bioaccumulation models to predict fish mercury response times to changes in atmospheric deposition Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28 (4) 881-893
64. Mason, R. P.; Lawson, N. M.; Lawrence, A. L.; Leaner, J. J.; Lee, J. G.; Sheu, G. R. Mercury in the Chesapeake Bay Mar. Chem. 1999, 65 (1-2) 77-96
65. Sunderland, E. M.; Dalziel, J.; Heyes, A.; Branfireun, B. A.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Gobas, F. A. P. C. Response of a macrotidal estuary to changes in anthropogenic mercury loading between 1850 and 2000 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (5) 1698-1704
66. Sonke, J. E. GET-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, CNRS, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France. Personal communication, 2014.
67. Amos, H. M.; Sunderland, E.; Corbitt, E. S.; Hedgecock, I.; Kocman, D.; Krabbenhoft, D.; Lamborg, C. H.; Obrist, D.; Pirrone, N.; Sonke, J. E.; Witt, M. L. I.; Horowitz, H. M. Estimating global anthropogenic enrichment of mercury: A critical review. In preparation.
68. Telmer, K. M.; Veiga, M. M. World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining. In Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere; Springer: New York, 2009; pp 131-172.
69. Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2001 Facts and Figures; EPA530-R-03-011; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, 2003.
70. Modern Landfills: A Far Cry from the Past; National Solid Wastes Management Association: Washington, DC, 2008.
71. Flewelling, F. J. Loss of mercury to the environment from chlor-alkali plants. In Special symposium on mercury in mans environment, Ottawa, Canada, February 15-16, 1971; Watkin, J. E., Ed.; National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1971.
72. Trip, L.; Thorleifson, M. The Canadian Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Industry: Mercury Emissions and Status of Facilities 1935-1996; Environment Canada, Transboundary Air Issues Branch: Quebec, Canada, April, 1998.
73. Materials balance and technology assessment of mercury and its compounds on national and regional bases; EPA 560/3-75-007; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Toxic Substances: Washington, D.C., October, 1975.
74. Obrist, D.; Pokharel, A. K.; Moore, C. Vertical profile measurements of soil air suggest immobilization of gaseous elemental mercury in mineral soil Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (4) 2242-2252
75. Krabbenhoft, D. Understanding the Propagation of Atmospheric Mercury through Terrestrial Landscapes: After Twenty Five Years of Research does the Story Make Sense? Presented at 11th International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2013.