Should we adjust for a confounder if empirical and theoretical criteria yield contradictory results? A simulation study

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Lee, Paul H ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ODDS RATIO; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84906224740     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06085     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Budtz-Jorgensen, E., Keiding, N.,Grandjean, P.&Weihe, P. Confounder selection in environmental epidemiology: Assessment of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure. Ann Epidemiol 17, 27-35 (2007). (Pubitemid 44920370)
2. Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S. &Lash, T. L. Modern Epidemiology. (Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, 2008).
3. Greenland, S. &Morgenstern, H. Confounding in health research. Annu Rev Public Health 22, 189-212 (2001).
4. McNamee, R. Regression modelling and other methods to control confounding. Occup Environ Med 62, 500-506 (2005). (Pubitemid 40904845)
5. Hernandez, A. V., Eijkemans, M. J. C. &Steyerberg, E. W. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: How much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power? Ann Epidemiol 16, 41-48 (2006). (Pubitemid 41783887)
6. Hernandez, A. V., Steyerberg, E. W. &Habbema, J. D. F. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. J Clin Epidemiol 57, 454-460 (2004). (Pubitemid 38758048)
7. Maldonado, G. &Greenland, S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol 138, 923-936 (1993). (Pubitemid 24002359)
8. Mickey, R. M. &Greenland, S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129, 125-137 (1989). (Pubitemid 19030705)
9. Hernan, M. A., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Werler, M. M. &Mitchell, A. A. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: An application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 155, 176-184 (2002). (Pubitemid 34072741)
10. Lee, P. H. Is the cutoff of 10% appropriate for the change-in-estimate confounder identification criterion? J Epidemiol 24, 161-167 (2014).
11. Greenland, S., Pearl, J. &Robins, J. M. Casual diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10, 37-48 (1999).
12. McNamee, R. Confounding and confounders. Occup Environ Med 60, 227-234 (2003). (Pubitemid 36269311)
13. Evans, D., Chaix, B., Lobbedez, T., Verger, C. &Flahault, A. Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology. BMC Med Res Methodol 12, 156 (2012).
14. Weng, H.-Y., Hsueh, Y.-H., Messam, L. L. M. &Hertz-Picciotto, I. Methods of covariate selection: Directed Acyclic Graphs and the Change-in-Estimate procedure. Am J Epidemiol 169, 1182-1190 (2009).
15. Arah, O. A., Chiba, Y. &Greenland, S. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders. Ann Epidemiol 18, 637-646, doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.003 (2008). (Pubitemid 352001388)
16. Fewell, Z., Davey Smith, G. &Sterne, J. A. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol 166, 646-655, doi:10.1093/aje/kwm165 (2007). (Pubitemid 47347902)
17. Tong, S. &Lu, Y. Identification of confounders in the assessment of the relationship between lead exposure and child development. Ann Epidemiol 11, 38-45 (2001). (Pubitemid 32063003)
18. Brenner, H. &Blettner, M. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 8, 429-434 (1997). (Pubitemid 27274231)
19. Robinson, L. D.& Jewell, N. P. Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Stat Rev 59, 227-240 (1991).
20. Maldonado, G. Toward a clearer understanding of causal concepts in epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol 23, 743-749 (2013).