Comparison of APACHE II, P-POSSUM and SAPS II scoring systems in patients underwent planned laparotomies due to secondary peritonitis

Annali Italiani di Chirurgia

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 16-21

  Das, Koray ^a   Ozdogan, Mehmet ^a   Karateke, Faruk ^a   Uzun, Abdurrahman Selcuk ^a   Sozen, Selim ^a   Ozdas, Sabri ^a  

^a Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

APACHE II; P POSSUM; Peritonitis; SAPS II

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APACHE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PERITONITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APACHE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906220447     PISSN: 0003469X     EISSN: 2239253X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Van Ruler O, Kiewiet JJ, Boer KR, Lamme B, et al.: Failure of available scoring systems to predict ongoing infection in patients with abdominal sepsis after their initial emergency laparotomy. BMC Surg, 2011; 11:38.
2. Padalino P, Chiara O, Ravizzini C, Gattinoni MP, Canini T, Montagnolo G, Marini AM. Role of the severity score and of the multiple organ dysfunctions in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis and its infective complications. Ann Ital Chir, 2005; 76(3):239-46.
3. Smith BP, Adams RC, Doraiswamy VA, et al.: Review of abdominal damage control and open abdomens: focus on gastrointestinal complications. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2010; 19(4):425-35.
4. Raki M, Popovi D, Raki M, et al.: Comparison of ondemand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Croat Med J, 2005; 46(6):957-63.
5. Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L. et al.: Complicated intraabdominal infections in a worldwide context: An observational prospective study (CIAOW Study). World J Emerg Surg, 2013; 8(1):1.
6. Nebelkopf H. Abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Nurs, 1999; 99(11):53-56,58,60
7. Agalar F, Eroglu E, Bulbul M, Agalar C, Tarhan OR, Sari: Staged abdominal repair for treatment of moderate to severe secondary peritonitis. World J Surg, 2005; 29(2):240-44.
8. Wittmann DH, Bansal N, Bergstein JM, Wallace JR, Wittmann MM, Abrahamian C. Staged abdominal repair compares favorable with conventional operative therapy for intra-abdominal infections when adjusting for prognostic factor with a logistic model. Theor Surg, 1994; 9:201-07
9. Grunau G, Heemken R, Hau T: Predictors of outcome in patients with postoperative intra-abdominal infection. Eur J Surg, 1996; 162(8):619-25.
10. Koperna T, Schulz F. Relaparatomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection.World J Surg, 2000; 24:32-37.
11. Andrus C, Doering M, Herrmann VM, Kaminski DL. Planned reoperation for generalized intraabdominal infection. Am J Surg, 1986; 152:682-86.
12. Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Reitsma JB, Mahler CW, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg, 2002; 89(12):1516-524.
13. Agalar F, Sayek I, Cakmakçi M, Hasçelik G, Abbasoglu O. Effect of omentectomy on peritoneal defence mechanisms in rats. Eur J Surg, 1997; 163(8):605-9.
14. Wacha H, Hau T, Dittmer R, Ohmann C. Risk factors associated with intraabdominal infections: A prospective multicenter study. Peritonitis Study Group. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 1999; 384:24-32.
15. Akut Kari{dotless}nla Basvuran Geriatrik Hastalarda Cerrahi Tedavi ve sonuçlari. F. Agalar, M Ozdogan, CE Daphan, S Topaloglu, I. Sayek. Geriatri, 1999; 2(1):1-4.
16. Merlino JL, Malangoni MA, Smith JM, Lange RL. Prospective randomised trials affect the outcomes of intraabdominal infections. Ann Surg, 2001; 233:856-66.
17. Malangoni MA. Current concepts in peritonitis. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2003; 5:295-301.
18. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II:A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 1985; 10:818-29.
19. Basscha K, Reinjders K, HuIstaert PF, et al.: Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intraabdominal sepsis. Br J Surg, 1997; 84:1532-534.
20. Mohil RS, Bhatnagar D, Bahadur L, Rajneesh, Dev DK, Magan M. POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg, 2004; 91(4):500-03.
21. Crea N, Di Fabio F, Pata G, Nascimbeni R. APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA scores and the risk of perioperative complications in patients with colorectal disease. Ann Ital Chir, 2009; 80(3):177-81.
22. Can MF, Yagci G, Tufan T, Ozturk E, Zeybek N, Cetiner S. Can SAPS II predict operative mortality more accurately than POSSUM and P-POSSUM in patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing resection? World J Surg, 2008; 32(4):589-95.
23. Delibegovic S, Markovic D, Hodzic S. APACHE II scoring system is superior in the prediction of the outcome in critically ill patients with perforative peritonitis. Med Arh, 2011; 65(2):82-85.
24. Gauzit R, Péan Y, Barth X, Mistretta F, Lalaude O. Top Study Team. Epidemiology, management, and prognosis of secondary nonpostoperative peritonitis: A French prospective observational multicenter study. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2009; 10(2):119-27.
25. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Kubota K. POSSUM is an optimal system for predicting mortality due to colorectal perforation. Hepatogastroenterology, 2008; 55(82-83):430-33.