Sport psychology for development and peace? Critical reflections and constructive suggestions

Journal of Sport Psychology in Action

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 169-180

  Guest, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

International development; Psychological skills; Sport

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906215097     PISSN: 21520704     EISSN: 21520712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21520704.2013.817493     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Black, D. (2010). The ambiguities of development: Implications for "Development through Sport." Sport in Society, 13(1), 121-129. doi:10.1080/174304309033 77938
2. Burnett, C. (2006). Building social capital through an "active community club." International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 41(3-4), 283-294. doi:10.1177/1012690207078381
3. Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98-124. doi:10.1177/0002716203260102
4. Coalter F (2006). Sport-in-development: A monitoring and evaluation manual. London, England: UK Sport.
5. Coalter, F. (2010a). Sport-for-development impact study. A research initiative funded by Comic Relief and UK Sport and managed by International Development through Sport. Stirling, Scotland: University of Stirling.
6. Coalter, F. (2010b). The politics of sport-for-development: Limited focus programs and broad gauge problems? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(3), 295-314. doi:10.1177/1012690210366791
7. Darnell, S. C. (2010). Sport, race and bio-politics: Encounters with difference in "Sport for Development and Peace" internships. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 34(4), 396-417. doi:10.1177/0193723510383141
8. Fraser-Thomas, J. L., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 19-40. doi:10.1080/1740898042000334890
9. Gould, D., & Carson, S. (2008). Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 58-78. doi:10.1080/17509840701834573
10. Guest, A. M. (2007). Cultures of childhood and psychosocial characteristics: Selfesteem and social comparison in two distinct communities. Ethos, 35, 1-32. doi:10.1525/eth.2007.35.1.1
11. Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2009). The power to shape policy: Charting sport for development and peace policy discourses. International Journal of Sport Policy, 1(2), 203-227. doi:10.1080/19406940902950739
12. Hewitt, J. P. (1998). The myth of self-esteem: Finding happiness and solving problems in America. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
13. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Logic model development guide: Logic models to bring together planning, evaluation & action. Battle Creek, MI: Author.
14. Kidd, B. (2008). A new social movement: Sport for development and peace. Sport in Society, 11(4), 370-380. doi:10.1080/17430430802019268
15. Levermore, R. (2011). Evaluating sport-for-development: Approaches and critical issues. Progress in Development Studies, 11(4), 339-353. doi:10.1177/1464 99341001100405
16. Petitpas, A. J., Cornelius, A. E., Van Raalte, J. L., & Jones, T. (2005). A framework for planning youth sport programs that foster psychosocial development. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 63-80. Retrieved from http://journals.humankinetics.com/tsp.
17. Right to Play (n.d.). "Mission" and "Our methodology." Retrieved from http://www.righttoplay.com/International/about-us/Pages/mission.aspx and http://www.righttoplay.com/International/our-impact/Pages/Methodology.aspx.
18. Wolff, A. (2011, September 26). Sports saves the world. Sports Illustrated, 115, 62-74.
19. Zeller-Berkman, S. (2010). Critical development? Using a critical theory lens to examine the current role of evaluation in the youth-development field. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Critical social theory and evaluation practice: New directions for evaluation, 127, 35-44. doi: 10.1002/ev.337