The Immunology Quality Assessment Proficiency Testing Program for CD3+4+ and CD3+8+ lymphocyte subsets: A ten year review via longitudinal mixed effects modeling

Journal of Immunological Methods

Volumn 409, Issue , 2014, Pages 82-90

  Bainbridge, J ^a   Wilkening, C L ^b   Rountree, W ^a   Louzao, R ^a   Wong, J ^a   Perza, N ^a   Garcia, A ^a   Denny, T N ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Cardiovascular Data Analysis Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Flow cytometry; IQA; Longitudinal analysis; Lymphocyte subset phenotyping; Mixed effects models; Proficiency testing

Indexed keywords

CD3 ANTIGEN; CD4 ANTIGEN; CD8 ANTIGEN;

CELL VIABILITY; FLOW CYTOMETER; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; HEMATOLOGY ANALYZER; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY QUALITY ASSESSMENT; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; T LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; VARIANCE;

FLOW CYTOMETRY; IQA; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET PHENOTYPING; MIXED EFFECTS MODELS; PROFICIENCY TESTING;

ANTIGENS, CD3; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CD8-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; LABORATORIES; LABORATORY PROFICIENCY TESTING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, IMMUNOLOGIC; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPECIMEN HANDLING; TIME FACTORS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84906097245     PISSN: 00221759     EISSN: 18727905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.017     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Calvelli T., Denny T.N., Paxton H., Gelman R., Kagan J. Guideline for flow cytometric immunophenotyping: a report from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Cytometry 1993, 14(7):702.
2. Fitzmaurice G.M., Laird N.M., Ware J.H. Applied Longitudinal Analysis 2004, Wiley-InterScience, Hoboken, NJ.
3. Fitzmaurice G.M., Davidian M., Verbeke G., Molenberghs G. Longitudinal Data Analysis 2009, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
4. Hedeker D., Gibbons R.D. Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychol. Methods 1997, 2(1):64.
5. Hultin L.E., Chow M., Jamieson B.D., O'Gorman M.R., Menendez F.A., Borowski L., Denny T.N., Margolick J.B. Comparison of interlaboratory variation in absolute T-cell counts by single-platform and optimized dual-platform methods. Cytometry B Clin. Cytom. 2010, 78(3):194. (May).
6. Kagan J., Gelman R., Waxdal M., Kidd P. NIAID Division of AIDS flow cytometry quality assessment program. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1993, 677:50. (Mar 20).
7. Nicholson J.K.A., Jones B.M., Cross G.D., McDougal J.S. Comparison of T and B cell analyses on fresh and aged blood. J. Immunol. Methods 1984, 73(1):29. (10/12).
8. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT 9.3 User's Guide 2011, SAS Institute Inc.
9. 4+ T lymphocyte flow cytometric enumeration and their clinical impact on HIV management. Cytometry B Clin. Cytom. 2013, 84B(4):248.