Large watershed management and restoration: Dioxin sediment remediation case study

International Journal of Environmental Studies

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 570-577

  VanHouten, Jacob W ^a  

^a University Center   (United States)

Author keywords

2,3,7,8 TCDD; Dioxin; Restoration; Sediments; Watershed

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906096034     PISSN: 00207233     EISSN: 10290400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2014.940127     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Brandt, E.N., 1997, Growth Company: Dow Chemical's First Century (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University).
2. Dow, H.H., 1926, Midland Sun: Portraying the City of Midland, Home of America's Greatest Chemical Institution. In: Why I came to Midland, 2nd edn (Midland, MI: Home of America's Greatest Chemical Institution).
3. ENVIRON, 2008, Current Conditions Report for the Tittabawassee River (Midland, MI: ENVIRON Corporation).
4. VanHouten, J.W., 2009, Dioxin assessment in a river flood plain: soil and sediment. Journal of ASTM International, 6(7), 2-3.
5. Dow Chemical Company, 2011, Tittabawassee River Segment 1 (OU1) Response Proposal (Dow Chemical River Response Team, April 14 Issue).
6. URS, 2009, H-14 Compliance Schedule Activity, Tittabawassee River - Reach B Pilot Cap Monitoring Plan (December 15 Issue).
7. URS, 2008, Reach D - Tittabawassee River - Final Report (March 19 Issue).
8. URS, 2009, Sediment Cap Installation and Temporary Sheet Piling Removal Plan (January 30 Issue 9).
9. EPA, 1988, Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA: Interim Final (United States Environmental Protection Agency, October Issue).
10. EPA, 2011, EPA Proposes Cleanup Plan for Polluted River Section, Tittabawassee River, Saginaw River and Bay Site Segment 1 Midland, Saginaw and Bay City, Michigan (August Issue).
11. EPA, 2007, Reach D Project Characterization Plan (March 19).
12. Radian International, 2000, Identification and Description of Glacial Till Sand Units in Areas the Tittabawassee River (April Issue).
13. ATS, 2009, Final GeoMorph Pilot Site Characterization Report, Volume I-VI, Upper Tittabawassee River and Floodplain Soils Midland Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Technical Services, Inc, June 15 Issue).
14. Anchor QEA, 2009, Reach B Tittabawassee River, Basis for Offshore Cap Design (July Issue).
15. Lambert, D.J. and Reible, D., 2009, An analytical modeling approach for evaluation of capping of contaminated sediments. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, 18(4), 470-488.
16. Sanchez, F.F., Thibodeaux, L.J., Valsaraj, K.T. and Reible, D.D., 2002, Multimedia chemical fate for environmental dredging. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 120-128.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2002)6:2(120)
17. Desrosiers, R. and Patmont, C., 2009, Environmental dredging residuals - case study summaries and analyses. In: G.S. Durell and E.A. Foote (Eds.) Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute), pp. 23-26.
18. Enggleton, J. and Thomas, K.V., 2004, A review of factors affecting the release of bioavailability of contaminates during sediment disturbance events. Environ International, 30, 973-980.10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.001
19. EPA, 2004, Contaminated Sediment Remediation Guidance for Hazardous Waste Sites, OSWER Directive 9355.0-85 (United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-540-R-05-012, December Issue).
20. Patmont, C. and Palermo, M., 2007, Case studies in environmental dredging residuals and implications. Paper D-066 in Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (Savannah, GA: Battelle Press), Columbus, OH, 22-25 January, January Issue.
21. National Research Council (NRC), 2007, Sediment Dredging at SUPERFUND MEGASITES - Assessing the Effectiveness (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
22. Available online at: www.epa.gov/region5/cleanup/dowchemical.