|
Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2014, Pages
|
Downgrading cancer definitions: overdiagnosis fuels the discussion.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BREAST TUMOR;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
EARLY DIAGNOSIS;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MALE;
MASS SCREENING;
METHODOLOGY;
MORTALITY;
NEOPLASM;
NOMENCLATURE;
PRECANCER;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
REGISTER;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTOR;
UNITED STATES;
UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;
WATCHFUL WAITING;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING;
CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INCIDENCE;
MALE;
MASS SCREENING;
MORTALITY;
NEOPLASMS;
PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
REGISTRIES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTORS;
TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
UNITED STATES;
WATCHFUL WAITING;
|
EID: 84906085329
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14602105
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju070 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|