Analyzing verbal data: Principles, methods, and problems

Second International Handbook of Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1471-1484

  Lemke, Jay L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906067261     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_94     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1935). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (Trans. 1981, pp. 259-422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, K. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.
4. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.
6. Coulthard, M. (1994). Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge.
7. Edwards, A. D., & Westgate, D. P. G. (1994). Investigating classroom talk. London: Falmer Press.
8. Erickson, F. (1982). Audiovisual records as a primary data source. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 213-232.
9. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1981). When is a context? In J. L. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147-160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
10. Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies (3rd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
11. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Green, J., & Harker, J. (Eds.). (1988). Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
13. Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
16. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
17. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 181-219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19. Hasan, R. (1989). The structure of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context, and text (pp. 52-69). London: Oxford University Press.
20. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
22. Lemke, J. L. (1988). Text structure and text semantics. In R. Veltman & E. Steiner (Eds.), Pragmatics, discourse, and text: Systemic approaches (pp. 158-170). London: Pinter.
23. Lemke, J. L. (1989). Social semiotics: A new model for literacy education. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 289-309). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
24. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
25. Lemke, J. L. (1991). Text production and dynamic text semantics. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, 55 ) (pp. 23-38). Berlin, Germany: Mouton/deGruyter.
26. Lemke, J. L. (1993). Intertextuality and educational research. Linguistics and Education, 4, 257-268.
27. Lemke, J. L. (1995a). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
28. Lemke, J. L. (1995b). Intertextuality and text semantics. In M. Gregory & P. Fries (Eds.), Discourse in society: Functional perspectives ( pp. 85-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
29. Lemke, J. L. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition (pp. 37-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Lemke, J. L. (1998a). Multiplying meaning, visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
31. Lemke, J. L. (1998b). Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5 (1), 33-56.
32. Lemke, J. L. (2002). Multimedia genres for science education and scientific literacy. In M. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages (pp. 21-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Malcolm, K. (1985). Communication linguistics: A sample analysis. In J. Benson & W. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (Vol. 2, pp. 136-151). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
34. Mann, W., & Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory. Text, 8, 243-281.
35. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
36. Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2007). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Matthiessen, C. (1992). Interpreting the textual metafunction. In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (pp. 37-81). London: Pinter.
38. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schiefflin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic.
39. Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
41. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
43. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wortham, S. (2005). Learning identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.