Development of the PROMIS® nicotine dependence item banks

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL.3, 2014, Pages

  Shadel, William G ^a   Edelen, Maria Orlando ^a   Tucker, Joan S ^a   Stucky, Brian D ^a   Hansen, Mark ^b   Cai, Li ^b  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLACK PERSON; CALIBRATION; CAUCASIAN; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAGERSTROM TEST FOR NICOTINE DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NICOTINE DEPENDENCE ITEM BANK; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RACE DIFFERENCE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; ADOLESCENT; ETHNIC GROUP; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALIBRATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ETHNIC GROUPS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; TOBACCO USE DISORDER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906064204     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu032     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Baker, T., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Bolt, D. M., Smith, S., Kim, S., Toll, B. (2007). Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: Implications for nicotine dependence. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9, S555-S570. doi:10.1080/14622200701673480
3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Cai, L. (2010). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75, 33-57. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9136-x
5. Cai, L., du Toit, S. H. C., & Thissen, D. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
6. Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized fullinformation item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 221-248. doi:10.1037/a0023350
7. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Rose, M.; PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl. 1), S3-S11. doi.org/:10.1097/01. mlr.0000258615.42478.55
8. Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289. doi:10.3102/10769986022003265
9. Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644-645. doi:10.1177/0146621608329892
10. Colby, S. M., Tiffany, S., Shiffman, S., & Niaura, R. S. (2000). Are adolescent smokers dependent on nicotine? A review of the evidence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 59, S83-S95. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00166-0
11. Courvoisier, D. S., & Etter, J. F. (2018). Using item response theory to study the convergent and discriminant validity of three questionnaires measuring cigarette dependence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 391-401. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.391
12. Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using Item Response Theory and the likelihoodbased model comparison approach: Application to the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Medical Care, 44(Suppl. 3), S134-S142. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245251.83359.8c
13. Edelen, M. O., Tucker, J. S., Shadel, W. G., Stucky, B. D., & Cai, L. (2012). Toward a more systematic assessment of smoking: Development of a smoking module for PROMISR. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 1278-1284. doi:10.1016/j. addbeh.2012.06.016
14. Etter, J. F., Le Houezec, J., & Perneger, T. V. (2003). A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: The cigarette dependence scale. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28, 359-370. doi:10.1038/ sj.npp.1300030
15. Fagerstrom, K. O. (1978). Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 3, 235-241. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(78)90024-2
16. Fiore, M. C., Jaen, C. R., Baker, T. B., Bailey, W. C., Benowitz, N. L., Curry, S. J., Wewers, M. E. (2008). Clinical practice guideline-Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service.
17. Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423-436. doi:10.1007/ BF02295430
18. Hansen, M., Cai, L., Stucky, B., Tucker, J., Shadel, W. G., & Edelen, M. O. (2014) Methodology for developing and evaluating the PROMIS® smoking item banks. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16, S174-S188.
19. Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerstrom, K. O. (1991). The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119-1127. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
20. Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., Rickert, W., & Robinson, J. (1989). Measuring the heaviness of smoking: Using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 791-799. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989. tb03059.x
21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
22. Hughes, J. R. (2011). The hardening hypothesis: Is the ability to quit decreasing due to increasing nicotine dependence? A review and commentary. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 117, 111-117. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.02.009
23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
24. Niaura, R., & Shadel, W. G. (2003). Screening and assessment. In D. B. Abrams, R. Niaura, R. Brown, K. Emmons, M. G. Goldstein, & P. M. Monti (Eds.), The tobacco dependence treatment handbook (pp. 27-72). New York, NY: Guilford.
25. Orlando, M., & Marshall, G. N. (2002). Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD checklist: Detection and evaluation of impact. Psychological Assessment, 14, 50-59. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.50
26. Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., & Baker, T. B. (2006). Assessing tobacco dependence: A guide to measure evaluation and selection. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 8, 339-351. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.50
27. Piper, M. E., Piasecki, T. M., Federman, E. B., Bolt, D. M., Smith, S. S., Fiore, M. C., & Backer, T. B. (2004). A multiple motive approach to tobacco dependence: The Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 139-154. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.139
28. Pomerleau, C. S., Carton, S. M., Lutzke, M. L., Flessland, K. A., & Pomerleau, O. F. (1994). Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 33-39. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(94)90049-3
29. Reeve, B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J., Cook, K., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., & Cella, D. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-S31. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04
30. Reise, S. P. (2012). Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
31. Rosenthal, D. G., Weitzman, M., & Benowitz, N. L. (2011). Nicotine addiction: Mechanisms and consequences. International Journal of Mental Health, 40, 22-38. doi:10.2753/IMH0020-7411400102
32. Shadel, W. G., Shiffman, S., Niaura, R., Nichter, M., & Abrams, D. B. (2000). Current models of nicotine dependence: What is known and what is needed to advance understanding of tobacco etiology among youth. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 59(Suppl. 1), S9-22. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00162-3
33. Shiffman, S., Ferguson, S. G., Dunbar, M. S., & Scholl, S. M. (2012). Tobacco dependence among intermittent smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14, 1372-1381. doi:10.1093/ ntr/nts097
34. Shiffman, S., Ferguson, S., Gwaltney, C., Balabanas, M., & Shadel, W. G. (2006). Reduction of abstinence induced withdrawal and craving using nicotine replacement therapy. Psychopharmacology, 184, 637-644. doi:10.1007/ s00213-005-0184-3
35. Shiffman, S., & Paty, J. (2006). Smoking patterns and dependence: Contrasting chippers and heavy smokers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 509-523. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.509
36. Shiffman, S., Waters, A., & Hickcox, M. (2004). The nicotine dependence syndrome scale: A multidimensional measure of nicotine dependence. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6, 327-348. doi:10.1080/1462220042000202481
37. Stolerman, I., & Jarvis, M. (1995). The scientific case that nicotine is addictive. Psychopharmacology, 117, 2-10. doi:10.1007/BF02245088
38. Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., & Edelen, M. O. (2013). Using logistic approximations of marginal trace lines to develop short assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 41-57. doi:10.1177/0146621612462759
39. Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 141-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
40. Tiffany, S. T., & Drobes, D. J. (1991). The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1467-1476. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01732.x