Spatial variability of hydrological processes and model structure diagnostics in a 50km2 catchment

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 4896-4913

  Mcmillan, Hilary ^a   Gueguen, Myriam ^b   Grimon, Elisabeth ^c   Woods, Ross ^d   Clark, Martyn ^e   Rupp, David E ^f  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^b MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^f OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic; Hydrology; Model structure; Process; Signatures; Variability

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DIGITAL STORAGE; GAGES; HYDROLOGY; MODEL STRUCTURES; PROCESSING; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE;

CATCHMENT CHARACTERISTICS; CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS; DIAGNOSTIC; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; SIGNATURES; SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT; VARIABILITY;

SOIL SURVEYS;

CATCHMENT; FLOW FIELD; FLOW MODELING; FLOW STRUCTURE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; RAINGAUGE; RIVER DISCHARGE; RUNOFF; SPATIAL VARIATION;

AUCKLAND; MAHURANGI ESTUARY; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND;

EID: 84906056836     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9988     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ali G, Oswald CJ, Spence C, Cammeraat ELH, McGuire KJ, Meixner T, Reaney SM. 2013. Towards a unified threshold-based hydrological theory: necessary components and recurring challenges. Hydrologie Continentale 27: 313-318. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9560
2. Atkinson SE, Woods RA, Sivapalan M. 2002. Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales. Water Resources Research 38: 1314. DOI: 10.1029/2002wr001487.
3. Atkinson SE, Sivapalan M, Viney NR, Woods RA. 2003a. Predicting space-time variability of hourly streamflow and the role of climate seasonality: Mahurangi Catchment, New Zealand. Hydrological Processes 17: 2171-2193. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1327.
4. Atkinson SE, Sivapalan M, Woods RA, Viney NR. 2003b. Dominant physical controls on hourly flow predictions and the role of spatial variability: Mahurangi catchment, New Zealand. Advances in Water Resources 26: 219-235. DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1708(02)00183-5.
5. Berger KP, Entekhabi D. 2001. Basin hydrologic response relations to distributed physiographic descriptors and climate. Journal of Hydrology 247: 169-182. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00383-3.
6. Beven KJ. 2000. Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4: 203-213.
7. Beven K. 2001a. On hypothesis testing in hydrology. Hydrological Processes 15: 1655-1657. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.436.
8. Beven K. 2001b. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer. Wiley: Chichester.
9. Beven K. 2008. On doing better hydrological science. Hydrological Processes 22: 3549-3553. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7108.
10. Biswal B, Marani M. 2010. Geomorphological origin of recession curves. Geophysical Research Letters 37: L24403.
11. Blöschl G, Zehe E. 2005. Invited Commentary - on hydrological predictability. Hydrological Processes 19: 3923-3929.
12. Blume T, Zehe E, Bronstert A. 2009. Use of soil moisture dynamics and patterns at different spatio-temporal scales for the investigation of subsurface flow processes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13: 1215-1233.
13. Brutsaert W, Lopez J P. 1998. Basin-scale geohydrologic drought flow features of riparian aquifers in the southern Great Plains. Water Resources Research 34: 233-240.
14. Brutsaert W, Nieber JL. 1977. Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau. Water Resources Research 13: 637-643.
15. Carrillo G, Troch PA, Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Harman C, Sawicz K. 2011. Catchment classification: hydrological analysis of catchment behavior through process-based modeling along a climate gradient. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 3411-3430. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-3411-2011.
16. Chirico GB, Grayson RB, Western AW. 2003. A downward approach to identifying the structure and parameters of a process-based model for a small experimental catchment. Hydrological Processes 17: 2239-2258. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1330.
17. Clark MP, Slater AG, Rupp DE, Woods RA, Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Wagener T, Hay LE. 2008. Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models. Water Resources Research 44: W00B02.
18. Clark MP, Rupp DE, Woods RA, Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, Peters NE, Freer JE. 2009. Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale. Hydrological Processes 23: 311-319. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7154.
19. Clark MP, Kavetski D, Fenicia F. 2011a. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research 47: W09301. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009827.
20. Clark MP, McMillan H, Collins D, Kavetski D, Woods R. 2011b. Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective: Part 2: process-based evaluation of model hypotheses. Hydrological Processes 25: 523-543.
21. Euser T, Winsemius HC, Hrachowitz M, Fenicia F, Uhlenbrook S, Savenije HHG. 2013. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17: 1893-1912. DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013.
22. Fenicia F, McDonnell JJ, Savenije HHG. 2008. Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding. Water Resources Research 44. DOI: 10.1029/2007wr006386.
23. Fenicia F, Kavetski D, Savenije HHG. 2011. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical development. Water Resources Research 47: W11510. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr010174.
24. Graham CB, Woods RA, McDonnell JJ. 2010. Hillslope threshold response to rainfall: (1) A field based forensic approach. Journal of Hydrology 393: 65-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.015.
25. Gupta HV, Wagener T, Liu YQ. 2008. Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. Hydrological Processes 22: 3802-3813. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6989.
26. Gupta HV, Clark MP, Vrugt JA, Abramowitz G, Ye M. 2012. Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy. Water Resources Research 48: W08301.
27. Hall FR. 1968. Base flow recessions - a review. Water Resources Research 4: 973-983.
28. Harman CJ, Sivapalan M, Kumar P. 2009. Power law catchment-scale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear small-scale dynamics. Water Resources Research 45. DOI: 10.1029/2008wr007392.
29. Harman CJ, Troch PA, Sivapalan M. 2011. Functional model of water balance variability at the catchment scale: 2. Elasticity of fast and slow runoff components to precipitation change in the continental United States. Water Resources Research 47: W02523. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009656.
30. Jones J. 2005. Intersite Comparisons of Rainfall-runoff Processes. In Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, Anderson MG (ed). Wiley: Chichester; 1839-1854.
31. Kavetski D, Fenicia F. 2011. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 2. Application and experimental insights. Water Resources Research 47: W11511. DOI: 10.1029/2011wr010748.
32. Kirchner JW. 2006. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research 42: W03s04. DOI: 10.1029/2005wr004362.
33. Krakauer NY, Temimi M. 2011. Stream recession curves and storage variability in small watersheds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 2377-2389. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-2377-2011.
34. Leavesley GH, Lichty RW, Troutman BM, Saindon LG. 1983. Precipitation-Runoff Modelling System: User's Manual. In: U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Invest. Rep., pp: 207.
35. Lehmann P, Hinz C, McGrath G, Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ. 2007. Rainfall threshold for hillslope outflow: an emergent property of flow pathway connectivity. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11: 1047-1063.
36. Li HY, Sivapalan M. 2011. Effect of spatial heterogeneity of runoff generation mechanisms on the scaling behavior of event runoff responses in a natural river basin. Water Resources Research 47: W00h08. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009712.
37. Li HY, Sivapalan M, Tian FQ. 2012. Comparative diagnostic analysis of runoff generation processes in Oklahoma DMIP2 basins: The Blue River and the Illinois River. Journal of Hydrology 418: 90-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.005.
38. McDonnell JJ, Woods RA. 2004. On the need for catchment classification. Journal of Hydrology 299: 2-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.003.
39. McDonnell JJ, Sivapalan M, Vache K, Dunn S, Grant G, Haggerty R, Hinz C, Hooper R, Kirchner J, Roderick ML, Selker J, Weiler M. 2007. Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology. Water Resources Research 43: W07301. DOI: 10.1029/2006wr005467.
40. McGlynn BL, McDonnell JJ, Seibert J, Kendall C. 2004. Scale effects on headwater catchment runoff timing, flow sources, and groundwater-streamflow relations. Water Resources Research 40: W07504. DOI: 10.1029/2003wr002494.
41. McMillan H. 2012. Effect of spatial variability and seasonality in soil moisture on drainage thresholds and fluxes in a conceptual hydrological model. Hydrological Processes 26: 2838-2844.
42. McMillan H, Clark M, Bowden WB, Duncan MJ, Woods R. 2011. Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective. Part 1: Diagnostic tests for model structure. Hydrological Processes 25: 511-522.
43. McMillan H, Krueger T, Freer J. 2012. Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: Rainfall, river discharge and water quality. Hydrological Processes 26(26): 4078-4111. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9384.
44. Merz R, Bloeschl G. 2009. A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria. Water Resources Research 45: W01405. DOI: 10.1029/2008wr007163.
45. Merz R, Bloschl G. 2004. Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. Journal of Hydrology 287: 95-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028.
46. Moore RJ. 2007 The PDM rainfall-runoff model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11: 483-499.
47. Norbiato D, Borga M, Merz R, Bloeschl G, Carton A. 2009. Controls on event runoff coefficients in the eastern Italian Alps. Journal of Hydrology 375: 312-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.044.
48. Peña-Arancibia JL, van Dijk AIJM, Mulligan M, Bruijnzeel LA. 2010. The role of climatic and terrain attributes in estimating baseflow recession in tropical catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 14: 2193-2205. DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-2193-2010.
49. Penna D, Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, Gobbi A, Borga M, Dalla Fontana G. 2011. The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 689-702. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-689-2011.
50. Peters NE, Freer J, Aulenbach BT. 2003. Hydrological Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia. Ground Water 41: 973-988. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02439.x.
51. Pokhrel P, Yilmaz KK, Gupta HV. 2012. Multiple-criteria calibration of a distributed watershed model using spatial regularization and response signatures. Journal of Hydrology 418: 49-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.004.
52. Post DA, Jakeman AJ. 1996. Relationships between catchment attributes and hydrological response characteristics in small Australian mountain ash catchments. Hydrological Processes 10: 877-892. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199606)10:6<877::aid-hyp377>3.0.co;2-t.
53. Price K. 2011. Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review. Progress in Physical Geography 35: 465-492. DOI: 10.1177/0309133311402714.
54. Quick MC. 1995. The UBC Watershed Model. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (ed). Water Resources Publications: Colorado; 233-280.
55. Rupp DE, Selker JS. 2006. Information, artifacts, and noise in dQ/dt-Q recession analysis. Advances in Water Resources 29: 154-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.019.
56. Rupp DE, Schmidt J, Woods RA, Bidwell VJ. 2009. Analytical assessment and parameter estimation of a low-dimensional groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology 377: 143-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.018.
57. Savenije HHG. 2009. HESS Opinions "The art of hydrology". Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13: 157-161.
58. Sawicz K, Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, Carrillo G. 2011. Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 2895-2911. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011.
59. Seibert J, McDonnell JJ. 2002. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration. Water Resources Research 38: 1241. DOI: 10.1029/2001wr000978.
60. Shaw SB, Riha SJ. 2012. Examining individual recession events instead of a data cloud: Using a modified interpretation of dQ/dt-Q streamflow recession in glaciated watersheds to better inform models of low flow. Journal of Hydrology 434: 46-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.034.
61. Sivapalan M. 2005. Pattern, Process and Function: Elements of a Unified Theory of Hydrology at the Catchment Scale. In Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, Anderson MG (ed). Wiley: Chichester; 194-219.
62. Sivapalan M, Yaeger MA, Harman CJ, Xu XY, Troch PA. 2011. Functional model of water balance variability at the catchment scale: 1. Evidence of hydrologic similarity and space-time symmetry. Water Resources Research 47: W02522. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009568.
63. Son K, Sivapalan M. 2007. Improving model structure and reducing parameter uncertainty in conceptual water balance models through the use of auxiliary data. Water Resources Research 43: W01415. DOI: 10.1029/2006wr005032.
64. Staudinger M, Stahl K, Seibert J, Clark MP, Tallaksen LM. 2011. Comparison of hydrological model structures based on recession and low flow simulations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 3447-3459. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-3447-2011.
65. Stoelzle M, Stahl K, Weiler M. 2012. Are streamflow recession characteristics really characteristic? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussion 9: 10563-10593. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-9-10563-2012.
66. Tague C, Grant GE. 2004. A geological framework for interpreting the low-flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Water Resources Research 40: W04303. DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002629.
67. Tallaksen LM. 1995. A review of baseflow recession analysis. Journal of Hydrology 165: 349-370.
68. Tian FQ, Li HY, Sivapalan M. 2012. Model diagnostic analysis of seasonal switching of runoff generation mechanisms in the Blue River basin, Oklahoma. Journal of Hydrology 418: 136-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.011.
69. Troch PA, Carrillo GA, Heidbuchel I, Rajagopal S, Switanek M, Volkmann THM, Yaeger M. 2008. Dealing with catchment heterogeneity in watershed hydrology: A review of recent progress towards new hydrological theory. Geography Compass 3: 375-392.
70. Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ. 2005. Comment to "Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes, Journal of Hydrology 286: 113-134". Journal of Hydrology 303: 307-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.002.
71. Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ. 2006a. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147-storm analysis of the Panola hillslope. Water Resources Research 42. DOI: 10.1029/2004wr003778.
72. Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ. 2006b. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis. Water Resources Research 42. DOI: 10.1029/2004wr003800.
73. Van Dijk A. 2010. Climate and terrain factors explaining streamflow response and recession in Australian catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 14: 159-169.
74. Wagener T, Wheater HS. 2006. Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty. Journal of Hydrology 320: 132-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.015.
75. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, Woods R. 2007. Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity. Geography Compass 1: 901-931.
76. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, McGlynn BL, Harman CJ, Gupta HV, Kumar P, Rao PSC, Basu NB, Wilson JS. 2010. The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world. Water Resources Research 46: W05301. DOI: 10.1029/2009wr008906.
77. Wang D. 2011. On the base flow recession at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, United States. Water Resources Research 47: W03527. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009910.
78. Western AW, Seyfried MS. 2005. A calibration and temperature correction procedure for the water-content reflectometer. Hydrological Processes 19: 3785-3793. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6069.
79. Western AW, Zhou SL, Grayson RB, McMahon TA, Bloschl G, Wilson DJ. 2004. Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology 286: 113-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.014.
80. Western AW, Zhou SL, Grayson RB, McMahon TA, Bloschl G, Wilson DJ. 2005. Reply to comment by Tromp van Meerveld and McDonnell on Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology 303: 313-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.001.
81. Wilson DJ, Western AW, Grayson RB, Berg AA, Lear MS, Rodell M, Famiglietti JS, Woods RA, McMahon TA. 2003. Spatial distribution of soil moisture over 6 and 30cm depth, Mahurangi river catchment, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology 276: 254-274. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00060-x.
82. Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP, Zartarian VG. 1992. A land-surface hydrology parameterization with subgrid variability for general-circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 97: 2717-2728.
83. Woods RA. 2004. The impact of spatial scale on spatial variability in hydrologic response: experiments and ideas. Scales in Hydrology and Water Management/Echelles en hydrologie et gestion de l'eau 287: 153-167.
84. Woods RA, Grayson RB, Western AW, Duncan MJ, Wilson DJ, Young RI, Ibbitt RP, Henderson RD, McMahon TA. 2001. Experimental Design and Initial Results from the Mahurangi River Variability Experiment: MARVEX. In Observations and Modelling of Land Surface Hydrological Processes, Lakshmi V, Albertson JD, Schaake J (eds). American Geophysical Union: Washington D.C.; 201-213.
85. Yilmaz KK, Gupta HV, Wagener T. 2008. A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model. Water Resources Research 44. DOI: 10.1029/2007wr006716.
86. Zecharias YB, Brutsaert W. 1988. Recession characteristics of groundwater outflow and base flow from mountainous watersheds. Water Resources Research 24: 1651-1658.