Prospects for building large timetrees using molecular data with incomplete gene coverage among species

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2542-2550

  Filipski, Alan ^a   Murillo, Oscar ^a,b   Freydenzon, Anna ^a   Tamura, Koichiro ^c   Kumar, Sudhir ^a,b,d,e  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^e TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergence time; Incomplete data; Timetree

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES; TIME PERCEPTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84906045297     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu200     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Battistuzzi FU, Filipski A, Hedges SB, Kumar S. 2010. Performance of relaxed-clock methods in estimating evolutionary divergence times and their credibility intervals. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1289-1300.
2. Brown R, Yang Z. 2011. Rate variation and estimation of divergence times using strict and relaxed clocks. BMC Evol Biol. 11:271.
3. Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ. 2004. Assembling the tree of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Douzery EJP, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2006. Les datations moléculaires à l'heure de la génomique. Med Sci. 22:374-380.
5. Douzery EJP, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2004. The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101:15386-15391.
6. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 7:214.
7. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 22: 160-174.
8. Hedges SB, Kumar S. 2009. The timetree of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Kishino H, Thorne JL, BrunoWJ. 2001. Performance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 18:352-361.
10. Kumar S. 1996. A stepwise algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol. 13:584-593.
11. Kumar S. 2005. Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 6:654-662.
12. Kumar S, Gadagkar SR. 2000. Efficiency of the neighbor-joining method in reconstructing deep and shallow evolutionary relationships in large phylogenies. J Mol Evol. 51:544-553.
13. Kumar S, Hedges SB. 1998. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392:917-920.
14. Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst Biol. 58: 130-145.
15. Meredith RW, Janecka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simao TL, Stadler T, et al. 2011. Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521-524.
16. Philippe H, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Lopez P, Holland PWH, Casane D. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1740-1752.
17. Rambaut A, Bromham L. 1998. Estimating divergence dates from molecular sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 15:442-448.
18. Rambaut A, Grassly NC. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic frees. Comput Appl Biosci. 13:235-238.
19. Rosenberg MS, Kumar S. 2003. Heterogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among evolutionary lineages and phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol. 20:610-621.
20. Roure B, Baurain D, Philippe H. 2013. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 30:197-214.
21. Rutschmann F. 2006. Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees: a brief review of current methods that estimate divergence times. Divers Distrib. 12:35-48.
22. Sanderson M, McMahon M, Steel M. 2010. Phylogenomics with incomplete taxon coverage: the limits to inference. BMC Evol Biol. 10:155.
23. Sanderson MJ. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol Biol Evol. 14: 1218-1231.
24. Sanderson MJ. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 19:101-109.
25. Tamura K, Battistuzzi FU, Billing-Ross P, Murillo O, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2012. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:19333-19338.
26. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725-2729.
27. Thorne JL, Kishino H. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst Biol. 51:689-702.
28. Wiens JJ, Morrill MC. 2011. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst Biol. 60: 719-731.
29. Wiens JJ, Tiu J, Moreau CS. 2012. Highly incomplete taxa can rescue phylogenetic analyses from the negative impacts of limited taxon sampling. PLoS One 7:1-8.
30. Yoder AD, Yang Z. 2004. Divergence dates for Malagasy lemurs estimated from multiple gene loci: geological and evolutionary context. Mol Ecol. 13:757-773.