Researching a gendered world: The intersection of methodological and ethical concerns

Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 98-110

  Allen, Mike ^a   Valde, Kathleen S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906027333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203873380     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Abelson , R. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. PsychologicalBulletin , 97, 129-133.
2. Allen , M. , Emmers-Sommer , T. , & Crowell , T . (2002). Couples negotiating safer sex behaviors: A metaanalysis of the impact of conversation and gender. In M. Allen , R. Preiss , B. Gayle , & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research:Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 263,pp.1-280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Anderson , J.A. (1987). Communication research: Issues and methods .New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Canary , D.J. ,& Emmers-Sommer , T.M. (1997 Sex and gender differences in personal relationships. New York: Guilford.
5. Canary , D.J. ,& Hause , K. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly , 41, 129-144.
6. Eagly , A. (1995a). The sciences and politics of comparing women and men. AmericanPsychologist , 50, 145-158.
7. Eagly , A. (1995b). Reflections of the commenter? views. American Psychologist , 50, 169-171.
8. Eichler , M. (1991). Nonsexist research methods: A practical guide . New York: Routledge.
9. Frey , L. , Pearce , W.B. , Pollock , M.A. , Artz , L. ,& Murphy , B.O. (1996). Looking for justice in all the wrong places: On a communication approach to social justice. Communcation Studies , 47, 110-127.
10. Gayle , B. , Preiss , R. , & Allen , M. (1994). Gender differences and the use of conflict strategies. In L. Turner and H. Sterk (Eds.), Differences that make a difference: Examining the assumptions in gender research (pp. 13-26). Westport , CT: Bergin & Garvey.
11. Gayle , B. , Preiss , R. ,& Allen , M. (1998). Embedded gender expectations: A covariate analysis of conflict situations and issues. Communication Research Reports , 15, 379-387.
12. Gayle , B. , Preiss , R. , & Allen , M. (2002). A meta-analytic interpretation of intimate and nonintimate interpersonal conflict. In M. Allen , R. Preiss , B. Gayle , & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 345-369). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Glass , G. , McGaw , B. ,& Smith , M. (1981) Meta-analysis in social research . BeverlyHills, CA: Sage.
14. Goldsmith , D. ,& Fulfs , P. (1999). "You just don't have the evidence" An analysis of claims and evidence. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 22 (pp. 1-50). Thousand Oaks , CA: Sage.
15. Gray , J. (1992). Men are from Mars,Women are from Venus. A practical guide to improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships . New York: HarperCollins.
16. Han , M. (2003). Body image dissatisfaction and eating disturbance among Korean college female students: Relationships to media exposure, upward comparison, and perceived reality. Communication Studies , 54, 65-78.
17. Harding , S. (1986). The science question in feminism . Ithaca, NY: Cornell UniversityPress.
18. Harding , S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women? lives .Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Herrett-Skjellum , J. , & Allen ,M. (1996). Television programming and sexual stereotypes: A metaanalysis. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 157-186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Hyde , J. , & Frost , L. (1993). Meta-analysis in the psychology of women. In F. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 185-207). Wesport, CT: Greenwood.
21. Hyde , J. ,& Plant , E. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side to the story. American Psychologist , 50, 129-161.
22. Jaggar , A.M. (1990). Sexual difference and sexual equality. In D.L. Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on sexual differences (pp. 239-254). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. MacGeorge , E.L. , Graves , A.R. , Feng , B. , Gillihan , S.J. ,& Burleson , B.R. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men's and women's provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles , 50, 143-175.
24. Putnam , L. (1982). In search of gender: A critique of communication and sex rolesresearch. Women's Studies in Communication , 5 , 1-9.
25. Rakow , L. (1986). Rethinking gender research in communication. Journal of Communication , 76, 11-26.
26. Reynolds , P.D. (1982). Ethics and social science research . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
27. Rosenthal , R. (1985). Meta-analysis procedures for social researchers .Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Sahlstein , E. , & Allen , M. (2002). Sex differences in self-esteem: A meta-analytic assessment. In M. Allen , R. Preiss , B. Gayle , & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 59-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Sommer , C. (1994). Who stole feminism? How women have betrayed women New York: Simon & Schuster.
30. Tannen , D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation . New York: Ballantine.
31. West , C. ,&1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society,1, 125-151.
32. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: Morrow.
33. Wood , J.T. (1996). Social justice research: Alive and well in the field of communication. communication Studies , 47, 128-134.
34. Wood , J.T. , & Dindia , K. (1998). What's the difference? A dialogue about differences and similarities between women and men. In D.J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigation of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 19-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.