Sex differences in interaction: A reexamination

Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 19-34

  Aries, Elizabeth ^a  

^a AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906015524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203873380     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Anderson , L.R & Blanchard , P.N. (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 3 , 109-139.
2. Aries , E. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female, and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior , 7 , 7-18.
3. Aries, E. (1987). Gender and communication. In P Shaver , & C. Hendrick (Eds), Sex and gender (pp. 149-176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage..
4. Aries , E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Baxter , L.A (1984). An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10 , 427-456.
6. Bergen , D.J., & Williams , J.E. (1991). Sex stereotypes in the United States revisited: 1972-1988. Sex Roles , 24 , 413-423.
7. Bergen , J. Cohen, B.P. & Zelditch, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37 , 241-255.
8. Berger , J. Fisek , M.H. Norman , R.Z. & Zelditch , M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.
9. Binion , V.J. (1990). Psychological androgyny: A Black female perspective Sex Roles ,22, 487-507.
10. Bohan , J.S. (1993). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly ,17, 5-21.
11. Bradley , P.H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women's speech: An empirical examination. communication Monographs ,48, 73-90.
12. Broverman , I.K Vogel, S.R. Broverman , D.M. Clarkson , F.E. & Rosenkrantz , P.S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues ,28, 59-78.
13. Canary , D.J. & Hause , K.S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly ,41, 129-144.
14. Carbonell , J.L. (1994). Sex roles and leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, ,69, 44-49.
15. Carli, L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ,59, 941-951.
16. Cohen , J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
17. Correll , S.J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review ,69, 193-113.
18. Davis , B.M. & Gilbert , L.A. (1989). Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ,57, 294-300.
19. Deaux , K. & Major , B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Bulletin ,94, 369-389.
20. De Leon, B. (1995). Sex role identity among college students: A cross-cultural analysis. In A.M Padilla ,(Ed), Hispanic psychology: Critical issues in theory and research (pp. 245-256). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage..
21. Dindia , K. & Allen , M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin ,112, 106-124.
22. Eagly, A.H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates..
23. Eagly , A.H. & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin ,108, 256-124.
24. Eagly , A.H. & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,60, 685-710.
25. Eagly , A.H. Makhijani , M.G. & Klonsky , B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin ,111, 3-22.
26. Eakins , B. & Eakins , R.G. (1983). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue.. In B.L. Dubois , & I. Crouch (Eds), Proceedings of the Conference on the Sociology of the Languages of American Women (pp. 53-62). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University..
27. Ellis , D.G. (1982). Relational stability and change in women's consciousness-raising groups. Women's Studies in Communication ,5, 77-87.
28. Gray , J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. A practical guide to improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships New York: HarperCollins..
29. Greif, E.B (1980). Sex differences in parent-child conversations. women's Studies International Quarterly, ,3, 253-258.
30. Harris, A.C. (1994). Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: A replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Sex Roles, ,31, 241-273.
31. Hawkins , K. (1988). Interruptions in task-oriented conversations: Effects of violations of expectations by males and females. Women's Studies in Communication ,11, 1-20.
32. Henley , N. (1933-4974). Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 18, 1-26..Reprinted In B. Thorne , & N. Henley Eds, 1975, Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 184-203). Rowley, MA: Newbury House..
33. Henley , N.M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall..
34. Hill, C.T & Stull, D.E. (1987). Gender and self-disclosure: Strategies for exploring the issues..In V. Derlega , & J.H. Berg (Eds), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 81-100). New York: Plenum.
35. Hyde , J.S., & Linn , M.C. (1986). The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore:: Johns Hopkins University Press..
36. James , D. & Clarke , S. (1993). Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review..In D. Tannen , (Ed), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 231-280). New York: Oxford University Press.
37. James , D. & Drakich , J. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review. In D. Tannen , (Ed), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281-312). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Johnson , C. (1994). Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinate conversations American Sociological Review , 59 , 122-135.
39. Johnson , P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues , 32 , 99-110.
40. Karakowsky , L. McBey, K. & Miller, D.L. (2004). Gender, perceived competence, and power displays: Examining verbal interruptions in a group context. Small Group Research , 35 , 407-439.
41. Karakowsky , L. & Siegel , J.P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology , 84 , 620-631.
42. Kollock , P. Blumstein , P. & Schwartz , P. (1985). TSex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50 , 34-46.
43. Kramarae , C. (1981). Men and women speaking. Rowley, MA:: Newbury House.
44. Kramarae, C. (1990).Changing the complexion of gender in language research..In H. Giles ,& W.P. Robinsons , (Eds), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 345-361). Chichester, England: Wiley.
45. Kramer , C. (1977). Perceptions of female and male speech. Language and Speech , 20 , 151-161.
46. Lawrence , S.G. Stucky , N.P. & Hopper , R. (1990). The effects of sex dialects and sex stereotypes on speech evaluations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9 , 209-224.
47. Lockheed , M.F. (1985). Sex and social influence: A meta-analysis guided by theory.. In J. Berger ,& M. Zelditch (Eds), Status, rewards and influence (pp. 406-429). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
48. Mast , M. (2002). Dominance as expressed and inferred through speaking time: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research , 28 , 420-450.
49. McCarrick , A.K. Manderscheid , R.W. & Silbergeld , S. (1981). Gender differences in competition and dominance during married-couples group therapy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44 , 164-177.
50. McCullough , M. (1987),November).women's friendships across cultures: Black and White friends speaking. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Boston, MA.
51. McLachlan , A.. (1991). The effects of agreement, disagreement, gender and familiarity on patterns of dyadic interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 10 , 205-212.
52. McLachlan , J.R. Clifton , A.K. McGrath , D. & Gale, W.S. (1977). Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality. Sex Roles, 3 , 545-559.
53. Megargee , E.I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53 , 377-382.
54. Miller , J.B. (1985). Patterns of control in same-sex conversations: Differences between women and men. Women's Studies in Communication, 8 , 62-69.
55. Mulac , A. Incontro , C.R. & James , M.R. (1985). Comparison of the gender-linked language effect and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 , 1098-1109.
56. Natale , M. Entin , E. & Jaffe , J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 , 865-878.
57. Newcombe , N. & Arnkoff, D.B. (1979). Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 , 1293-1303.
58. Nyquist , L. & Spence , J.T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 , 87-93.
59. O'Barr, W. & Atkins, B. (1980). "Women's language" or "powerless language"?. In S. .McConnell-Ginet , R. Borker , & N. Furman (Eds), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 93-110). New York: Praeger..
60. Postmes , T. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 28 , 1073-1083.
61. Pugh , M.D. & Wahrman , R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology , 88 , 746-762.
62. Pugh , M.D. & Wahrman , R. (1985). Inequality of influence in mixed-sex groups.. In J. Berger , & M. Zelditch (Eds), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 142-162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
63. Reis , H.T. Senchak , M. & Solomon , B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 , 1204-1217.
64. Reis , R.W. Bender , L.R. & Vitters , A.G. (1980). Leader sex, follower attitudes toward women, and leadership effectiveness: A laboratory experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25 , 46-78.
65. Risman , B.J. (1987). Intimate relationships from a micro-structural perspective: Men who mother. Gender and Society , 1 , 6-32.
66. Sagrestano , L. (1992). Power strategies in interpersonal relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 16, 481-495.
67. Siegler , D.M. ,& Siegler , R.S. (1976). Stereotypes of males' and females' speech. Psychological Reports , 39 , 167-170.
68. Smythe , M. & Schlueter , D.W. (1989). Can we talk? A meta-analytic review of the sex differences in language literature.. In C.M. Lont , & S.A Friedley , (Eds), Beyond boundaries: Sex and gender diversity in communication (pp. 31-48). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press..
69. Snodgrass , S.E. ,(1985). Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 , 146-155.
70. Snodgrass , S.E. (1992). Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 62 , 154-158.
71. Spender , D. ((1980).) Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
72. Steil , J.M. ,& Hillman , J.L. ((1993).)The perceived value of direct and indirect influence startegies: A cross-cultural comparison. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 457-462.
73. Swim, J.K. ,(1994.)Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 21-36
74. Tannen , D. ((1990).) You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.
75. Thorne , B. & Henley , N. (1975). Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender and society.. In B. Henley , (Eds), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 5-42). Rowley, MA: Newbury House..
76. Torres , L. (1992). Women and language: From sex differences to power dynamics.. In C. Kramarae &, D. Spender (Eds), The knowledge explosion: Generations of feminist scholarship (pp. 281-290). New York: Teacher's College Press..
77. Tracy , K. & Eisenberg , E. ,(1990-1991)Giving criticism: A multiple goals case study Research on Language and Social Interaction 24 37-70
78. Unger , R.K. (1976)Male is greater than female: The socialization of status inequality Counseling Psychologist 62 2-9
79. Unger , R.K. (1979). Female and male: Psychological perspectives New York: Harper & Row.
80. Unger , R.K. (1990). Imperfect reflections of reality: Psychology constructs gender.. In R.T HareMustin &, J. Marecek (Eds), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 102-149). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..
81. Werner , P.D. ,& LaRussa , G.W. (1985). Persistence and change in sex role stereotypes. Sex Roles , 12 , 1089-1100.
82. West , C. ,& Zimmerman , D.H. (1977). Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems , 24 , 521-529.
83. West , C. ,& Zimmerman , D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1 125-151
84. Wheelan , S.A. ,& Verdi , A.F. (1992) Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artifact? Sex Roles , 27 , 1-15
85. Wiley , M.G. ,& Eskilson , A. (1998) Speech style, gender stereotypes and corporate success: What if women talk more like men? Sex Roles , 12 , 993-1007
86. Wood , W. ,& Karten , S.J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology , 50 , 341-347.
87. Woods , N. (1998). Talking shop: Sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In J. Coates ,& D. Cameron (Eds), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex (pp. 141-157). New York: Longman..