Sex differences versus social processes in the construction of gender

Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 173-187

  Crawford, Mary ^a   Kaufman, Michelle R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906015464     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203873380     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Anderson , K.J. ,& Leaper , C. (1998). Meta-analysis of gender effects on conversational interruptions: Who, what, when, where, and how. Sex Roles , 39 , 225-252.
2. Berger , J. , Wagner , D.G. ,& Zelditch , M.Jr. ,(1985).Introduction: Expectation states theory-Review and assessment. In J.Berger, & M.Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 1-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Berry , D.S. , Pennebaker , J.W. , Mueller , J.S. ,& Miller , W.S. (1997). Linguistic bases of social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 23 , 526-537.
4. Cameron , D. (1996). Performing gender identity: Young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In S. Johnson ,& U.H. Meinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp. 47-64). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
5. Canary , D.J. ,& Dindia , K .(Eds.).(1998). Sex differences and similarities incommunication .Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Canary , D.K. ,& Emmers-Sommer , T.M. (1997). Sex and gender differences in personalrelationships , New York: Guilford.
7. Clark , H.H. (1996). Using language .New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cohen , B.P. , Berger , J. ,& Zelditch , M (1972)Status conceptions and interactions: A case study of developing cumulative knowledge. In C. McClintock (Ed.) Experimental social psychology (pp. 408-411). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Crawford , M (1995) Talking difference: On gender and language London Sage.
10. Crawford , M. (2001). Gender and language. In R.K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 228-244). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11. Crawford , M. (2003). Gender and humor in social context. Journal of Pragmatics , 35 , 1413-1430.
12. Crawford , M. (2004). Mars and Venus collide: A discursive analysis of marital self-helppsychology. Feminism & Psychology , 14 , 63-79.
13. Crawford , M. (2006) Transformations: Women, gender, and psychology .New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Crawford , M. .,& Popp , D. (2003).Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research , 40, 13-26.
15. Crawford , M. , & Unger , R. (2004). Women and gender: A feminist psychology . Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16. Duval , L.L. ,& Ruscher , J.B. (1994, July). Men use more detail to explain a gender-neutral task to women Poster presented at the annual meeting of the AmericanPsychological Society, Washington DC.
17. Eagly , A.H. , Beall , A.E. ,& Sternberg , R.J .(Eds.).(2004). The psychology of gender (2nded.). New York: Guilford.
18. Edwards , D. ((1998).The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use In C. Antaki ,& S. Widdicombe , (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 15-34). London: Sage.
19. Fillmore , C. (1981)Pragmatics and the description of discourseIn P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 142-166). New York: Academic Press.
20. Fiske , A.P. , Haslam , N. ,& Fiske , S.T. (1991). Confusing one person with another: Whaterrors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology , 60 , 656-674.
21. Galliano , G. (2003). Gender: Crossing boundaries .Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22. Gray , J. .(1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. A practical guide toimproving communication and getting what you want in your relationships New York:HarperCollins.
23. Glick , P. ,& Fiske , S.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism ascomplementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist , 56 , 109-118.
24. Hall , K. . (1995). Lip service on the fantasy lines. In K. Hall , & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated (pp. 183-216). New York: Routledge.
25. Harasty , A.S. (1997). The interpersonal nature of social stereotypes: Differentialdiscussion patterns about in-groups and out-groups. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin , 23 , 270-284.
26. Hare-Mustin , R.T. ,& Marecek , J. (1994). Asking the right questions: Feministpsychology and sex differences. Feminism & Psychology , 4 , 531-537.
27. Henley , N.M. (1977). Body politics .Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Hilton , D.J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference andrational judgment. Psychological Bulletin , 118 , 248-271.
29. Holtgraves , T.M. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and languageuse .Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Hyde , J.S. (1994). Should psychologists study gender differences? Yes, with someguidelines. Feminism & Psychology , 4 , 507-512.
31. James , D. , & Drakich , J. (1993) Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281-312). New York: Oxford.
32. Kitzinger , C. (1994). Sex difference: Feminist perspectives. Feminism & Psychology , 4 , 501-596.
33. Kitzinger , C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology , 10 , 163-193.
34. Kitzinger , C. ,& Frith , H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis indeveloping a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society , 10 , 293-316.
35. Lakoff , R. (1975). Language and "woman's place .New York: Harper & Row.
36. Lewis , D.K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study .Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.
37. Marecek , J. , Crawford , M. , & Popp , D. (2004). On the construction of gender, sex, and sexualities. In A.H. Eagly , A.E. Beall , & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed.), (pp. 192-216). New York: Guilford.
38. Maass , A. , Salvi , D. , Arcuri , L. ,& Semin , G. (1989). Language use in intergroupcontexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 68 , 116-126.
39. McCarthy , J. (1990). Formalization of two puzzles involving knowledge. In V. Lifschitz (Ed.), Formalizing common sense: Papers by John McCarthy (pp. 158-166). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Molm , L.D. , & Hedley , M. (1992). Gender, power, and social exchange. In C.L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender interaction,and inequality (pp. 1-28). New York: Springer-Verlag.
41. Mulkay , M. (1988). On humor .New York: Basil Blackwell.
42. Nichter , M. (2000). Fat talk .Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Popp.D. Donovan , R.A. , Crawford , M. , Marsh , K.L. , & Peele, M.(2003). Gender, race,and speech style stereotypes. Sex Roles , 48 , 317-325.
44. Potter , J. ,& Wetherell , M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology .London: Sage.
45. Pratto , F. ,& Walker , A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In A.H. Eagly , A.E. Beall , & R.J. ternberg (Eds), The psychology of gender (2nd ed.) (pp. 242-268). New York: Guilford.
46. Ruscher , J.B. (2001). Prejudiced communication: A social psychological perspective .New York: Guilford.
47. Schiffer , S.R. (1972). Meaning .Oxford University Press.
48. Schiffrin , D. (1994). Approaches to discourse .Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
49. Schiffrin , D. , Tannen , D. ,& Hamilton , H.E. (2003). The handbook of discourse analysis .Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
50. Sidanius , J. ,& Pratto , F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression .New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Stapleton , K. (2001). Constructing a feminist identity: Discourse and the community of practice. Feminism & Psychology , 11 , 459-491.
52. Thakerar , J.M. ,& Giles , H. (1981). They are-so to speak: Noncontent speechstereotypes. Language and Communication , 1 , 251-256.
53. Thorne , B. , & Henley , N. (Eds.). (1975). An overview of language, gender and society. In B. Thorne , & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 5-42). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
54. Thorne , B. , Kramarae , C. ,& Henley , N .(Eds.).(1983) Language, gender,and society Rowley,MA: Newbury House.
55. Turnbull , W. (2003). Language in action: Psychological models of conversation .New York: Psychology Press.
56. Unger , R.K. (1976). Male is greater than female: The socialization of status inequality. The Counseling Psychologist , 6 , 2-9.
57. Unger , R.K. (1978). The politics of gender: A review of relevant literature. In J. Sherman , & F. Denmark (Eds.), Psychology of women: Future directions of research (pp. 463-517). New York: Psychological Dimensions.
58. Unger , R.K. (1979). Female and male: Psychological perspectives .New York: Harper & Row.
59. Unger , R.K. (1989). Explorations in feminist ideology: Surprising consistencies and unexamined conflicts. In R. Unger (Ed.), Representations: Social constructions of gender (pp. 203-211). New York: Baywood.
60. Unger , R.K. (1992). Will the real sex differences please stand up? Feminism & Psychology , 2 , 231-238.
61. Unger , R.K. (2001). Handbook of the psychology of women and gender .Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
62. Weatherall , A. (2002) Gender, language,and discourse anddiscourse .New York: Routledge.
63. Wetherell , M. ,& Edley , N. ((1999))Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psychdiscursive practices Feminism & Psychology, 9, 335-356.
64. Williams , F. , Whitehead , J.L .,& Miller L. (1972)Relations between attitudes and teacher expectancy American Educational Research Journal 9 ,263-277.
65. Zimmerman D.H. , West , C. (1975).Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation.In B. Thorne , & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Differences and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.