Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 664-674

  Henry, Kevin A ^a   McDonald, Kaila ^b   Sherman, Recinda ^c   Kinney, Anita Y ^d   Stroup, Antoinette M ^a  

^a RUTGERS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c North American Association of Central Cancer Registries   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; INSURANCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; URBAN POPULATION; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INSURANCE COVERAGE; INSURANCE, HEALTH; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION; UTAH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905984465     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4668     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United states cancer statistics: 1999-2009 Incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2013. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs
2. Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United States preventive services task force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196: W112-W116.
3. Kim J, Jang SN. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among U.S. women: Trends from 2000 to 2005. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41:186-194.
4. Rattanawatkul K, Carter-Pokras O. Decline and disparities in mammography use trends by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity. U Maryland McNair Scholars Undergrad Res J 2011;3:10.
5. Rauscher GH, Allgood KL, Whitman S, Conant E. Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012;21:154-160.
6. Kempe KL, Larson RS, Shetterley S, Wilkinson A. Breast cancer screening in an insured population: Whom are we missing? The Permanente Journal. 2013;17:38.
7. Wells KJ, Roetzheim RG. Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in Latinas: a critical review of recent literature. Cancer Control 2007;14:369-379.
8. Finney Rutten LJ, Nelson DE, Meissner HI. Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000). Prev Med 2004;38:258-268.
9. Elkin EB, Ishill NM, Snow JG, etal. Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Med Care 2010;48:349-356.
10. Elkin EB, Snow JG, Leoce NM, Atoria CL, Schrag D. Mammography capacity and appointment wait times: Barriers to breast cancer screening. Cancer Causes Control CCC. 2012;23:45-50.
11. Elting LS, Cooksley CD, Bekele BN, et al. Mammography capacity impact on screening rates and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Am J Preventive Med 2009;37:102-108.
12. Khan N, Kaestner R, Salmon JW, Gutierrez B. Does supply influence mammography screening? Am J Health Behav 2010;34:465-475.
13. Meersman SC, Breen N, Pickle LW, Meissner HI, Simon P. Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: A multi-level analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:1469-1482.
14. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999. Cancer 2002;94:2801-2812.
15. Meilleur A, Subramanian SV, Plascak JJ, Fisher JL, Paskett ED, Lamont EB. Rural residence and cancer outcomes in the United States: Issues and challenges. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:1657-1667.
16. Miller JW, King JB, Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, White MC: Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: state-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:352-360.
17. Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Driscoll D, Clayton L, Anselin L. Heterogeneity in mammography use across the nation: separating evidence of disparities from the disproportionate effects of geography. Int J Health Geogr 2008;7:32.
18. Sabatino SA, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Breen N, Tangka F, Shaw KM. Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Med Care 2008;46:692-700.
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010.
20. Office of Public Health Assessment. Utah's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System trend report 1989-1999. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Department of Health, 2001.
21. Force USPST. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:344-346.
22. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Operational and user's guide, version 3.0. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006:1-112. Available at: http://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Data/Brfss/userguide.pdf Accessed December 29, 2012.
23. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2011-2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, Inc., 2011.
24. Block LD, Jarlenski MP, Wu AW, Bennett WL. Mammo-graphy use among women ages 40-49 after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:1147-1153.
25. Pace LE, He Y, Keating NL. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Cancer 2013;119: 2518-2523.
26. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Social Behav 1995;36:1-10.
27. Andersen RM, Davidson PL. Improving access to care in America: Individual and contextual indicators. In: R Andersen, T Rice, J Kominski, eds. Changing the U.S. health care system: Key issues in health services, policy, and management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001:3-30.
28. Brown SL, Gibney TM, Tarling R. Busy lifestyles and mammography screening: Time pressure and women's re-attendance likelihood. Psychol Health. 2013:1-11.
29. Wang F. Measurement, optimization, and impact of health care accessibility: A methodological review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2012;102:1104-1112.
30. Aday LA, Andersen RM. Equity of access to medical care: a conceptual and empirical overview. Med Care 1981;19: 4-27.
31. Cromley EK, McLafferty S. GIS and public health. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2012:304-337.
32. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2000 Rural-urban commuting area (ruca) codes: Documentation. 2013. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ rural-urban-commuting-area-codes/documentation.aspx#.UfQPF421HX5 Accessed December 1, 2012.
33. University of Washington Rural Health Research Center. Rural urban commuting areas (RUCAs). 2007. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ index.php Accessed December 1, 2012.
34. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) Shortest Path Finder Tool, NAACCR Inc, Springfield, IL. Available at: www.naaccr.org/Research/ ShortestPathFinder.aspx Accessed March 1, 2013.
35. Luo W, Qi Y. An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health Place 2009;15:1100-1107.
36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: www.healthypeople.gov/ 2010 Accessed March 5, 2013.
37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: www.healthypeople.gov/ 2020/topicsobjectives2020/default.aspx Accessed March 5, 2013.
38. Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L. Competing demands in the office visit: What influences mammography recommendations? J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:352-361.
39. Ryerson AB, Miller JW, Eheman CR, Leadbetter S, White MC. Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000-2006: A population-based analysis. Prev Med 2008;47:477-482.
40. Carney PA, O'Malley J, Buckley DI, et al. Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings. Cancer 2012;118:6217-6225.
41. Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Richardson LC, Miller J. Health insurance and other factors associated with mammography surveillance among breast cancer survivors: Results from a national survey. Med Care 2012;50:270-276.
42. Utah Department of Health, Utah Cancer Control Program (UCCP). Eligibility requirements. Available at: www.cancerutah.org/Screening-Services/ Eligibility-Requirements.php Accessed March 12 2014.
43. American Cancer Society. The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program saves lives, Available at: www.acscan.org/pdf/breastcancer/ factsheets/state-facts/Utah.pdf Accessed August 24, 2013.
44. Lofquist D, Lugaila T, O'Connell M, Feliz S. The Census Bureau's Households and Families: 2010, U.S. Census Bureau,. Available at: www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf, ed2012 Accessed August 7, 2011.
45. Lambe M, Hsieh CC, Chan HW, Ekbom A, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO. Parity, age at first and last birth, and risk of breast cancer: A population-based study in Sweden. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;38:305-311.
46. Colditz G, Baer H, Tamimi R. Breast cancer. In: Schot-tenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006:995-1012
47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss Accessed August 7, 2011.
48. Henry KA, Sherman R, Farber S, Cockburn M, Goldberg DW, Stroup AM. The joint effects of census tract poverty and geographic access on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 10 US States. Health Place. 2013;21:110-121.
49. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). Report to Congressional requesters: Mammography: Current nationwide capacity is adequate, but access problems may exist in certain locations. In: Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-06-724. Washington, DC: US G A O, 2006.
50. FDA Certified Mammography Facilities 2008-2010 (Raw Data on CD-ROM), Rockville, MD. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 2011. http://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20080917140511/http://www.ntis.gov/ products/mammog.aspx Accessed August 1, 2011.
51. May H. Utah doctors will soon provide mammogram on wheels. Salt Lake Tribune, July, 16 2012. Available at: www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/54463626-78/ women-utah-medical-babcook.html.csp Accessed August 15, 2013.