Process Evaluation of the Enabling Mothers to Prevent Pediatric Obesity Through Web-Based Learning and Reciprocal Determinism (EMPOWER) Randomized Control Trial

Health Promotion Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 685-694

  Knowlden, Adam P ^a   Sharma, Manoj ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

evaluation methods; formative evaluation; process evaluation; quantitative evaluation; summative evaluation

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; MOTHER; PEDIATRIC OBESITY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; MOTHERS; PEDIATRIC OBESITY; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 84905969994     PISSN: 15248399     EISSN: 15526372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1524839914523431     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bandura A.Health promotion by social cognitive means.Health Education & Behavior. 2004;31 (2): 143-164.
2. Basch C. E.,Sliepcevich E. M.,Gold R. S.,Duncan D. F.,Kolbe L. J.Avoiding type III errors in health education program evaluations: A case study.Health Education & Behavior. 1985;12 (3): 315-331.
3. Clark J. E.,Clements R. L.,Guddemi M.,Morgan D. W.,Pica R.,Pivarnik J. M., Virgilio S. J.Active start: A statement of physical activity guidelines for children birth to five years. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2002:.
4. FergussonD.AaronS. D.GuyattG.HebertP. (2002). Post-randomisation exclusions: The intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. British Medical Journal, 325, 652-654. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7365.65.
5. Golan M.,Crow S.Targeting parents exclusively in the treatment of childhood obesity: Long-term results.Obesity Research. 2004;12 (2): 357-361.
6. Haire-Joshu D.,Elliott M. B.,Caito N. M.,Hessler K.,Nanney M. S.,Hale N., Brownson R. C.High 5 for Kids: The impact of a home visiting program on fruit and vegetable intake of parents and their preschool children.Preventive Medicine. 2008;47 (1): 77-82.
7. Knowlden A. P.Feasibility and efficacy of the Enabling Mothers to Prevent Pediatric Obesity Through Web-Based Education and Reciprocal Determinism (EMPOWER) randomized control trial. 2013;:.
8. Knowlden A. P,Sharma M.Systematic review of family-and-home-based interventions targeting paediatric overweight and obesity.Obesity Reviews. 2012a;13 (6): 499-508.
9. Knowlden A. P.,Sharma M.A feasibility and efficacy randomized controlled trial of an online preventative program for childhood obesity: Protocol for the EMPOWER intervention.JMIR Research Protocols. 2012b;1 (1): e5.
10. Patrick H.,Nicklas T. A.A review of family and social determinants of children's eating patterns and diet quality.Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2005;24 (2): 83-92.
11. Rao G.Childhood obesity: Highlights of AMA Expert Committee recommendations.American Family Physician. 2008;78 (1): 56-63.
12. Saunders R. P.,Evans M. H.,Joshi P.Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: A how-to guide.Health Promotion Practice. 2005;6 (2): 134-147.
13. Warren J. M.,Golley R. K.,Collins C. E.,Okely A. D.,Jones R. A.,Morgan P. J., Magarey A. M.Randomised controlled trials in overweight children: Practicalities and realities.International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. 2007;2 (2): 73-85.
14. Windsor R.,Clark N.,Boyd N. R.,Goodman R. M.Evaluation of health promotion, health education, and disease prevention. 2004). Evaluation of health promotion, health education, and disease prevention (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004:.
15. Windsor R. A.,Whiteside H. P.,Solomon L. J.,Prows S. L.,Donatelle R. J.,Cinciripini P. M.,McIlvain H. E.A process evaluation model for patient education programs for pregnant smokers.Tobacco Control. 2000;9:iii29-iii35.