Exclusive approaches to climate governance: More effective than the UNFCCC?

Toward a New Climate Agreement: Conflict, Resolution and Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 155-166

  Andresen, Steinar ^a  

^a FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905948286     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203080009     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Abbott, K.w. (2012). The Transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(4), 571-90.
2. Abbott, K.w.(2013). Constructing a transitional climate change regime: bypassing and managing states. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), February 9, 2013.
3. Andresen, S. (2007). The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions. International Environmental Agreements: Law, Politics and Economics 7(4), 317-36.
4. Andresen, S. (2013). International regime effectiveness. In R. Falkner (ed.), The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy. London: wiley, pp. 304-19.
5. Andresen, S., N. Kanie and P.M. Haas (2014). Actor configurations in the climate regime: the states call the shots. In N. Kanie, S. Andresen and P.M. Haas (eds.), Improving Global Environmental Governance Best Practices for Architecture and Agency. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 175-96.
6. Barbier, E.B. (2010). A global green recovery, the G20 and international STO cooperation in clean energy. STI Policy Review 1(3), 1-15.
7. Biermann, F. and S. Bauer (eds.) (2005). A World Environmental Organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
8. Biermann, F., P. Pattberg and F. zelli (eds.) (2010). Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: architecture, agency and adaptation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bodansky, D. and L. Rajamani (2012). The evolution and governance architecture of the climate change regime. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), October 28, 2012.
10. Bruynicks, H. and S. Happaerts (2013). Negotiating in the new world order: emerging powers and the global climate change regime. Paper, ISA Annual Convention, San Francisco, April 3-6, 2013.
11. Chair's Summary (2013). Meeting of the leader's representatives of the major economies forum on energy and climate, April 12, 2013.
12. Fujiwara, N. (2012). Sector-specific activities as the driving force towards a low-carbon economy from the asia-pacific partnership to a global partnership. CEPS (Center for European Policy) Policy Brief No. 262, January 2012.
13. Greene, J. (2013). Order out of chaos: Public and private rules for managing carbon. Global Environmental Politics 13(2), 1-25.
14. Greenspan Bell, R. and M. ziegler (eds.) (2012). Building International Climate Cooperation: lessons from the weapons and trade regimes for achieving international climate goals. washington, DC: world Resources Institute.
15. Kanie, N., M. Suzuki and M. Iguchi (2013). Fragmentation of international lowcarbon technology governance: an assessment in terms of barriers to technology development. Global Environmental Research 17(1), 61-70.
16. Karlssonvinkhuyzen, S. and H. van Asselt (2009). Introduction: exploring and explaining the Asia Pacific Partnership on clean development and climate. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9(3), 195-211.
17. Keohane, R. and D. victor (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics 9(7), 7-23.
18. Kim, J.A. and SuhYong Chung (2012). The role of the G20 in governing the climate change regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 12(4), 361-74.
19. Lund, E. (2013). Hybrid Governance in Practice: public and private actors in the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism. Ph.D. thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
20. McGee, J. (2010). The Asia Pacific Partnership and Contestation for the Future of the International Climate Regime. Submitted for Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
21. Miles, E., A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J.B. Skjærseth and E. Carline (2002). Environmental Regime Effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Mitchell, R. (2010). International Politics and the Environment. London: Sage Publications.
23. Najam, A. (2003). The case against a new international environmental organization. Global Governance 9(3), 367-84.
24. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Peay, S.A. (2007). Joining the AsiaPacific Partnership: the environmentally sound decision. Colorado Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 18 (Spring), 477.
26. Raustiala, K. and D. victor (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 58(2), 277-309.
27. Roberts, T. and M. Grosso (2013). A Fair Compromise to Break the Climate Impasse. A paper: Global views 40, washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28. Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. In E. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. wettestad, J.B. Skjærseth and E. Carline, International Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3-45.
29. Victor, D. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Young, O. (2013). Does fairness matter in international environmental governance? Creating an effective and equitable climate regime. In T. Cherry, J. Hovi and D. McEvoy (eds.) (2014), Toward a New Climate Agreement: conflict, resolution and governance. London: Routledge.