Long-range and local circuits for top-down modulation of visual cortex processing

Science

Volumn 345, Issue 6197, 2014, Pages 660-665

  Zhang, Siyu ^a   Xu, Min ^a   Kamigaki, Tsukasa ^a   Do, Johnny Phong Hoang ^a   Chang, Wei Cheng ^a   Jenvay, Sean ^a   Miyamichi, Kazunari ^b,c   Luo, Liqun ^b   Dan, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR; HALORHODOPSIN; SOMATOSTATIN; VASOACTIVE INTESTINAL POLYPEPTIDE;

NEUROLOGY; PEPTIDE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SENSORY SYSTEM;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; FRONTAL CORTEX; INTERNEURON; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVE FIBER; NEUROMODULATION; NEUTRON SCATTERING; NONHUMAN; OPTOGENETICS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STRIATE CORTEX; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; TOP DOWN MODULATION; TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL; VISION;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); GABAERGIC NEURONS; GYRUS CINGULI; INTERNEURONS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NEURAL INHIBITION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SOMATOSTATIN; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84905924750     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1254126     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. R. Desimone, J. Duncan, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222 (1995).
2. S. Kastner, L. G. Ungerleider, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 315-341 (2000).
3. J. H. Reynolds, D. J. Heeger, Neuron 61, 168-185 (2009).
4. S. Treue, J. H. Maunsell, J. Neurosci. 19, 7591-7602 (1999).
5. J. W. Bisley, M. E. Goldberg, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 1-21 (2010).
6. E. K. Miller, J. D. Cohen, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167-202 (2001).
7. R. F. Squire, B. Noudoost, R. J. Schafer, T. Moore, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 451-466 (2013).
8. H. Zhou, R. Desimone, Neuron 70, 1205-1217 (2011).
9. T. J. Buschman, E. K. Miller, Science 315, 1860-1862 (2007).
10. G. G. Gregoriou, S. J. Gotts, H. Zhou, R. Desimone, Science 324, 1207-1210 (2009).
11. T. Moore, K. M. Armstrong, Nature 421, 370- 373 (2003).
12. B. Noudoost, T. Moore, Nature 474, 372-375 (2011).
13. L. B. Ekstrom, P. R. Roelfsema, J. T. Arsenault, G. Bonmassar, W. Vanduffel, Science 321, 414-417 (2008).
14. Y. Chen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 11, 974-982 (2008).
15. K. A. Sundberg, J. F. Mitchell, J. H. Reynolds, Neuron 61, 952-963 (2009).
16. K. McAlonan, J. Cavanaugh, R. H. Wurtz, Nature 456, 391-394 (2008).
17. G. Purushothaman, R. Marion, K. Li, V. A. Casagrande, Nat. Neurosci. 15, 905-912 (2012).
18. M. Sarter, M. E. Hasselmo, J. P. Bruno, B. Givens, Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 48, 98-111 (2005).
19. Y. B. Saalmann, M. A. Pinsk, L. Wang, X. Li, S. Kastner, Science 337, 753-756 (2012).
20. M. A. Segraves, M. E. Goldberg, J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1387- 1419 (1987).
21. The projection to superior colliculus arises only from deep layers (Fig. 1D), similar to that in primate FEF.
22. S. Treue, J. C. Martínez Trujillo, Nature 399, 575-579 (1999).
23. T. Moore, M. Fallah, J. Neurophysiol. 91, 152-162 (2004).
24. X. Xu, K. D. Roby, E. M. Callaway, J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 389-404 (2010).
25. G. Fishell, B. Rudy, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 535-567 (2011).
26. H. Adesnik, W. Bruns, H. Taniguchi, Z. J. Huang, M. Scanziani, Nature 490, 226-231 (2012).
27. S. H. Lee et al., Nature 488, 379-383 (2012).
28. N. R. Wilson, C. A. Runyan, F. L. Wang, M. Sur, Nature 488, 343-348 (2012).
29. L. Petreanu, T. Mao, S. M. Sternson, K. Svoboda, Nature 457, 1142-1145 (2009).
30. I. R. Wickersham et al., Neuron 53, 639-647 (2007).
31. S. Lee, I. Kruglikov, Z. J. Huang, G. Fishell, B. Rudy, Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1662-1670 (2013).
32. L. Madisen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 15, 793-802 (2012).
33. Y. Fu et al., Cell 156, 1139-1152 (2014).
34. C. K. Pfeffer, M. Xue, M. He, Z. J. Huang, M. Scanziani, Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1068-1076 (2013).
35. H. J. Pi et al., Nature 503, 521-524 (2013).
36. J. F. Mitchell, K. A. Sundberg, J. H. Reynolds, Neuron 55, 131-141 (2007).
37. Based on a magnification factor of 10 mm per degree in mouse V1 (42), 200 mm of cortical distance corresponds to 20° of visual angle. A previous study (26) showed that for most neurons, the preferred size of visual stimulus was <15° in radius, and stimuli beyond this radius suppressed neuronal responses. This suggests that surround suppression for top-down modulation and bottom-up processing occur on similar spatial scales. The same inhibitory circuits could also contribute to decreased receptive field similarity and signal correlation between V1 neurons over ∼200 μm (42).
38. J. J. Letzkus et al., Nature 480, 331-335 (2011).
39. X. Jiang, G. Wang, A. J. Lee, R. L. Stornetta, J. J. Zhu, Nat. Neurosci. 16, 210-218 (2013).
40. S. P. Mysore, E. I. Knudsen, Nat. Neurosci. 16, 473-478 (2013).
41. S. Ardid, X. J. Wang, A. Compte, J. Neurosci. 27, 8486-8495 (2007).
42. V. Bonin, M. H. Histed, S. Yurgenson, R. Clay Reid, J. Neurosci. 31, 18506 (2011).