Balancing a house of cards: Throughput legitimacy in Canadian governance networks

Canadian Journal of Political Science

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 259-280

  Doberstein, Carey ^a   Millar, Heather ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905908967     PISSN: 00084239     EISSN: 17449324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0008423914000420     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ACHSIP (Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons). 1997. "Minutes from the July 20, 1997 meeting." Metro Toronto.
2. ACHSIP (Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons). 1998. "Minutes from the January 30, 1998 meeting." Metro Toronto.
3. ACHSIP (Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons). 1999. "Minutes from the January 22, 1999 meeting." Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, City of Toronto.
4. ACHSIP (Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons). 2005. "Terms of Reference." City of Toronto
5. ACHSIP (Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons). 2006. "Minutes from the April 24, 2006 meeting", Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, City of Toronto.
6. Andrew, Caroline and David Doroleux. 2012. "Economic development, social inclusion and urban governance: The case of the city-region of Ottawa in Canada." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (6): 1288-1305.
7. ASAH (Alberta Secretariat for Action on Homelessness). 2008. A Plan for Alberta: Ending Homelessness in Ten Years. Calgary. ASAH.
8. Bache, I. and M. Flinders. 2004. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Bakvis, Herman. "'In the shadows of hierarchy': Intergovernmental governance in Canada and the European Union." Canadian Public Administration 56 (2): 203-18.
10. Bell, Stephen, and Andrew Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Benz, Arthur. 2010. "Multilevel Parliaments in Canada and Europe." International Journal 66: 109.
12. Benz, Arthur, and Yannis Papadopoulos, eds. 2006. Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. New York: Psychology Press.
13. Bovens, Mark. 2007. "New Forms of Accountability and EU-Governance." Comparative European Politics 5 (1): 104-20, doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110101.
14. Bradford, Neil. 2004 "Place Matters and Multi-level Governance: Perspectives on a New Urban Policy Paradigm." Policy Options 25 (2): 39-44.
15. Bradford, Neil. 2008 "Rescaling for a Generation? Canada's Urban Development Agreements."Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Vancouver BC. June 4-6.
16. Bradford, Neil. 2012. "The Federal 'Communities Agenda': Metagovernance for Place-based Policy in Canada." In Canada in Cities: The Politics and Policy of Federal-Local Governance, ed. Caroline Andrew and Katherine A. H. Graham. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's Press.
17. CAC (Calgary Action Committee on Housing and Homelessness). 2010. Terms of Reference.http://calgaryhomeless.com/assets/CAC/CAC-Terms-of-Reference-2010. pdf (January 13, 2014).
18. CAC (Calgary Action Committee on Housing and Homelessness). 2012. CAC Social Policy Consultation What We Heard. http://calgaryhomeless.com/agencies/ cachh/(January 13, 2014).
19. CAC (Calgary Action Committee on Housing and Homelessness). 2013. CACHH Framework, August 2013. ://calgaryhomeless.com/agencies/cachh/(January 13, 2014).
20. CBC News. 2008. "Calgary needs $3.2B to end homelessness: Committee." http://www.cbc. ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-needs-3-2b-to- end-homelessness-committee-1.705242 January 29 (January 13, 2014).
21. CHF (Calgary Homeless Foundation). 2011a. Calgary's 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness 2008-2018: January 2011 Update. Calgary:CHF.
22. CHF (Calgary Homeless Foundation). 2011b. Making Research Matter: A Progress Report on Calgary's Research Agenda to End Homelessness. Calgary: CHF.
23. Calgary H. 2007. "CEOs promise homeless solution." http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/story.html?id=e51f7800-be91-413a-a6af- 8e8207c4611e&k=7384 January 10, 2007 (January 13, 2014).
24. Doberstein, Carey. 2011. "Institutional Creation and Death: Urban Development Agreements in Canada." Journal of Urban Affairs 33 (5): 529-48.
25. Doberstein, Carey. 2012. "Applying European Ideas on Federalism and Doing It Better? The Government of Canada's Homelessness Policy Experiment." Canadian Public Policy 38 (3): 395-410.
26. Doberstein, Carey. 2013. "Metagovernance of local governance networks in Canada: In pursuit of legitimacy and accountability." Canadian Public Administration 56 (4): 584-609.
27. Falvo, N. 2010. "Homelessness, Toronto's Streets to Homes Program." In Finding Home: Policy Options for Addressing Homelessness in Canada, ed. J. David Hulchanski, Philipa Campsie, Shirley Chau, Stephen Hwang and Emily Paradis, Toronto: Cities Centre, University of Toronto. www.homelesshub.ca/FindingHome (June 25, 2013).
28. Finke, Barbara. 2007. "Civil Society Participation in EU Governance." Living Reviews in European Governance 2. doi:10.12942/lreg- 2007-2. http://europeangovernance.livingreviews. org/Articles/lreg-2007-2/(May 13, 2013).
29. Grande, Edgar, and Louis W. Pauly. 2005. Complex sovereignty: Reconstituting political authority in the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
30. Greenwood, Justin. 2007. "Organized Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union." British Journal of Political Science 37 (02): 333-57. doi:10.1017/S0007123407000166.
31. Haas, Peter. 1992. "Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination." International Organization 46 (1) (January 1): 1-35.
32. Heritier, A. and Rhodes, M. 2011. New Modes of Governance in Europe: Governing in the Shadow of Hierarchy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Hooghe, L. and G. Marks. 2003. "Unraveling the Central States, But How? Types of Multilevel Governance." American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233-43.
34. Horak, Martin. 2010. "Understanding neighbourhood revitalization in Toronto." Paper presented at the annual general meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 1-3, Montreal, Canada.
35. Horak, Martin and Robert Young, eds. 2012. Sites of Governance: Multilevel Governance and Policy Making in Canada's Big Cities. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
36. Howlett, Michael. 2000. "Managing the 'hollow state': Procedural policy instruments and modern governance." Canadian Public Administration 43 (4): 412-31.
37. Kohler-Koch, Beate. 2010a. "How to Put Matters Right? Assessing the Role of Civil Society in EU Accountability." West European Politics 33 (5): 1117-41. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486141.
38. Kohler-Koch, Beate. 2010b. "Civil Society and EU Democracy: 'Astroturf' Representation?" Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 100-16. doi:10.1080/13501760903464986.
39. Kohler-Koch, Beate and Berthold Rittberger. 2006. "Review Article: The 'Governance Turn' in EU Studies." JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (S1): 27-49. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00642.x.
40. Laforest, Rachel. 2013. "Shifting scales of governance and civil society participation in Canada and the European Union." Canadian Public Administration 56 (2): 235-51.
41. Laforest, Rachel, and Michael Orsini. 2005. "Evidence-Based Engagement in the Voluntary Sector: Lessons from Canada." Social Policy and Administration 39 (5): 481-97.
42. Laforest, Rachel, and Susan Phillips. 2007. "Citizen Engagement: Rewiring the Policy Process." In Critical Policy Studies, ed. Michael Orsini and Miriam Smith. Vancouver: UBC Press.
43. Levesque, M. 2012. "Mapping a way forward: Interest group selection and roles performed in engagement processes." Canadian Public Administration 55 (4), 531-52.
44. Lindgren, Karl-Oskar, and Thomas Persson. 2010. "Input and Output Legitimacy: Synergy or Trade-off? Empirical Evidence from an EU Survey." Journal of European Public Policy 17 (4): 449-67, doi:10.1080/13501761003673591.
45. Mascarenhas, M. and R. Scarce. 2004. "'The intention was good': Legitimacy, consensusbased decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada." Society and natural resources 17 (1): 17-38.
46. Millar, Heather. 2013. "Comparing Accountability Relationships between Governments and Non-state Actors in Canadian and European International Development Policy." Canadian Public Administration 56 (2): 252-69.
47. Montpetit, Éric. 2008. "Policy Design for Legitimacy: Expert Knowledge, Citizens, Time and Inclusion in the United Kingdom's Biotechnology Sector." Public Administration 86 (1): 259-77, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299. 2007.00698.x.
48. Montpetit, Éric. 2003. "Public consultations in policy network environments: The case of assisted reproductive technology policy in Canada. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 29 (1): 95-110.
49. Ostrom, V., R. Bish and E. Ostrom. 1998. Local government in the United States. San Francisco: ICS Press.
50. Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2007. "Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance." European Law Journal 13 (4): 469-86. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00379.x.
51. Pierre, Jon. 1998. Partnerships in Urban Governance: European and American Experience. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.
52. Risse, T. and M. Kleine. 2007. "Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU's Treaty Revision Methods." JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (1), 69-80.
53. Scharpf, Fritz Wilhelm. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and 'Throughput.'" Political Studies 61 (1): 2-22, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x.
55. Skogstad, Grace. 2003a. "Who Governs? Who Should Govern? Political Authority and Legitimacy in Canada in the Twenty-First Century." Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 36 (05): 955-73, doi:10.1017/S0008423903778925.
56. Skogstad, Grace. 2003b. "Legitimacy and/or policy effectiveness? Network governance and GMO regulation in the European Union." Journal of European Public Policy 10 (3), 321-38.
57. Sorensen, Eva and J. Torfing. 2007 "Introduction: Governance Network Research: Towards a Second Generations." In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, ed. E. Sorensen and J. Torfing., London: Palgrave MacMillan.
58. Tanasescu, Alina. 2010. "Learnings from Calgary's 10-Year Plan Implementation." Presentation to the Alliance to End Homelessness, Ottawa ON, November 19.
59. Tömmel, Ingeborg, and Amy Verdun, eds. 2009. Innovative Governance in the European Union: The Politics of Multilevel Policymaking. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.
60. Toronto Disaster Relief Committee. 1998. "State of Emergency Declaration: An Urgent Call for Humanitarian Relief and Prevention Measures." Toronto: Toronto Disaster Relief Committee.
61. van Meerkerk, Ingmar., J. Edelenbos, and E.H. Klijn. 2014. "Connective management and governance network performance: The mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands." Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 000-000 (advance online publication).
62. Wolfe, David A. 2009. Twenty-first Century Cities in Canada: The Geography of Innovation. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada.
63. Verdun, Amy and Donna E. Wood. 2013. "Governing the social dimension in Canadian federalism and European integration." Canadian Public Administration 56 (2): 173-84.
64. Young, Robert and Christian Leuprecht. 2006. Municipal-Federal-Provincial Relations in Canada. Institute for Intergovernmental Relations. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.