Impact of the consideration of serrated polyps to the interval of colonoscopic surveillance in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Pullens, B ^a,b   Dekker, E ^b   Ellis, A J ^a   Guy, R ^c   Madronal, K ^a   Chetty, R ^a   East, J E ^a  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c CHURCHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colonic polyps; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Guidelines; Healthcare costs

Indexed keywords

GUAIAC;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DYSPLASIA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTESTINE CANCER; INTESTINE POLYP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME; VILLOUS ADENOMA; ADENOMATOUS POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; AGED; CLINICAL AUDIT; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATE MEDICINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84905858591     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12607     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. World Health Organisation. GLOBOCAN 2012 Fast Stats. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx (accessed February 2014).
2. Sugumar A, Sinicrope FA. Serrated polyps of the colon. F1000 Med Rep 2010; 2: 89.
3. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-57.
4. EuropaColon. Colorectal Cancer: Screening and Prevention. http://europacolon.com/preventionandscreening.php?Action=Preventionandscreening. (accessed February 2014).
5. European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis - First Edition. http://europacolon.com/documents/uploaded/5-Document-Screening-Guidelines-Feb-2011.pdf (accessed March 2012).
6. Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2088-100.
7. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 89-95.
8. Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-29.
9. Bosman F, Carneiro F, Hruban R, Theise N WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, 4th edn. Lyon: IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010.
10. Li D, Jin C, McCulloch C et al. Association of large serrated polyps with synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 695-702.
11. Hiraoka S, Kato J, Fujiki S et al. The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1503-10.
12. East JE. Proximal serrated polyp detection at colonoscopy: the best of times... the worst of times? Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 521-4.
13. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 2010; 59: 666-89.
14. Terdiman JP, McQuaid KR. Surveillance guidelines should be updated to recognize the importance of serrated polyps. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1444-7.
15. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-95.
16. Adenoma Surveillance. BCSP Guidance Note No. 1. Version 1, September 2009. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/publications/nhsbcsp-guidance-note-1.pdf (accessed December 2013).
17. Komeda Y, Suzuki N, Sarah M et al. Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 395-400.
18. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM et al. The impact of detection of serrated polyps on surveillance programs in primary colonoscopy screening. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: S142.
19. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-803.
20. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-308.
21. Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1497-502.
22. Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 42-6.
23. Hetzel JT, Huang CS, Coukos JA et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2656-64.
24. Gill P, Wang LM, Bailey A, East JE, Leedham S, Chetty R. Reporting trends of right-sided hyperplastic and sessile serrated polyps in a large teaching hospital over a 4-year period (2009-2012). J Clin Pathol 2013; 66: 655-8.
25. Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 519-22.