Modeling concepts for process audits-an empirically grounded extension of bpmn

ECIS 2013 - Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Mueller Wickop, Niels ^a   Schultz, Martin ^a   Nuettgens, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Audit Concepts; BPMN Extension; Expert Interview; Process Audit

Indexed keywords

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

AUDIT CONCEPTS; BPMN EXTENSION; ENTERPRISE MODELING; EXPERT INTERVIEW; FINANCIAL REPORTING; FINANCIAL STATEMENTS; INFORMATION REQUIREMENT; PROCESS AUDITS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84905842925     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Ahlemann, F. and Gastl, H. (2007). Process model for an empirically grounded reference model construction. Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis (eds P. Fettke and P. Loos), pp. 77-97. IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
2. Alencar, P., Boritz, J.E. and Carnaghan, C. (2008). Business Modeling to Improve Auditor Risk Assessment: An Investigation of Alternative Representations. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Symposium on Audit Research, ISAR pp. 30-31.
3. Amer, T., Lucy, R. and Maris, J. (2002). The effects of system representation on the efficiency and effectiveness of control and maintenance reviews.
4. Bell, T.B. (1997). Auditing Organizations Through a Strategic-systems Lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Process. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Montvale N.J.
5. Carnaghan, C. (2006). Business process modeling approaches in the context of process level audit risk assessment: An analysis and comparison. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7, 170-204.
6. Chambers, A. and Rand, G. (2011). The Operational Auditing Handbook: Auditing Business and IT Processes, 2nd ed. Wiley.
7. Ellerman, D.P. (1985). The Mathematics of Double Entry Bookkeeping. Mathematics Magazine, 58, 226-233.
8. Frank, U. (2002). Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO). conceptual framework and modeling languages. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002. HICSS pp. 1258-1267.
9. IIA (The Institute of Internal Auditors). (2008). SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 404: A Guide for Management by Internal Controls Practitioners.
10. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2010). Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements.
11. Karagiannis, D., Mylopoulos, J. and Schwab, M. (2007). Business Process-Based Regulation Compliance: The Case of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2007. RE 07., 315-321.
12. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M. and Scheer, A. (1992). Semantische Prozebmodellierung Auf Der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozebketten (EPK). Tech. Rep., Universitt des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany.
13. Ko, R.K.L., Lee, S.S.G. and Lee, E.W. (2009). Business process management (BPM). standards: a survey. Business Process Management Journal, 15, 744-791.
14. Korherr, B. and List, B. (2007). Extending the EPC and the BPMN with business process goals and performance measures. 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems pp. 287-294.
15. List, B. and Korherr, B. (2006). An Evaluation of Conceptual Business Process Modelling Languages. pp. 1532-1539.
16. Menzel, C. and Mayer, R.J. (2006). The IDEF Family of Languages. Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems International Handbooks on Information Systems. (eds P. Bernus, K. Mertins and G. Schmidt), pp. 215-249. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Myers, M.D. (2009). Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Sage Publications.
18. OMG (Object Management Group). (2011). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN).-version 2.0.
19. OMG (Object Management Group). (2006) Meta Object Facility ( MOF ) Core Specification. Management, 1-76.
20. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications.
21. Pfadenhauer, M. (2007). Das Experteninterview. Qualitative Marktforschung (eds R. Buber and H.H. Holzmüller), pp. 449-461. Gabler.
22. Recker, J. (2010). Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal, 16, 181-201.
23. Rosemann, M. and Zur Muehlen, M. (2005). Integrating Risks in Business Process Models. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005). p. 50.
24. Ruhnke, K. (2006). Business Risk Audits: State of the Art und Entwicklungsperspektiven. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 56, 189-218.
25. Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data Management and Analysis Methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research (eds N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln), Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Schalles, C., Creagh, J. and Rebstock, M. (2011). Usability of Modelling Languages for Model Interpretation: An Empirical Research Report. Wirtschaftinformatik Proceedings 2011, 787-796.
27. Scheer, A.-W. (2000). Aris-Business Process Modeling. Springer.
28. Schultz, M., Mueller-Wickop, N. and Nuettgens, M. (2012). Key Information Requirements for Process Audits-An Expert Perspective. Proceedings of the EMISA p. 137-150.
29. Seidman, I. (1997). Interviewing as Qualitative Research, 2 Sub. Teachers College Press, New York, NY, USA.
30. Stebbins, R.A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
31. Strecker, S., Heise, D. and Frank, U. (2010a). Toward modeling constructs for audit risk assessment: Reflections on internal controls modeling. MobIS 2010: Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme ; modellgestütztes Management pp. 131-148. Dresden.
32. Strecker, S., Heise, D. and Frank, U. (2010b). RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment. Information Systems Frontiers, 13, 595-611.
33. Strecker, S., Heise, D. and Frank, U. (2011). Prolegomena of a modelling method in support of audit risk assessment-Outline of a domain-specific modelling language for internal controls and internal control systems. Proceedings of the EMISA pp. 5-24.
34. Stroppi, L.J.R., Chiotti, O. and Villarreal, P.D. (2011). Extending BPMN 2.0: Method and Tool Support. Business Process Model and Notation, 59-73.
35. Stuart, I.C. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Services : an Applied Approach. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY.
36. Trinczek, R. (2009). Wie befragt man Manager? Methodische und methodologische Aspekte des Experteinterviews als qualitativer Methode empirischer Sozialforschung. Experteninterviews: Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungsfelder, 3., grundlegend überarbeitete Aufl. 2009 (eds A. Bogner, B. Littig and W. Menz), VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
37. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R. (2012). A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (eds K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger and B. Kuechler), pp. 423-438. Springer Berlin /Heidelberg.
38. Vom Brocke, J., Sonnenberg, C. and Baumoel, U. (2011). Linking Accounting and Process-Aware Information Systems-Towards a Generalized Information Model For Process-oriented Accounting. ECIS 2011 Proceedings.
39. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R. and Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. 17th European conference on information systems
40. Zur Muehlen, M. and Recker, J. (2008). How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. Advanced Information Systems Engineering pp. 465-479