Editorial: Nuclear waste management in a globalised world

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 12, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages 879-895

  Strandberg, Urban ^a   Andrén, Mats ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Globalisation; Legitimacy; Nuclear waste management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905759695     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870903134899     Document Type: Editorial

References (36)

1. Andrén, M., and Strandberg, U., eds. 2005. Kärnavfallets politiska utmaningar [Political challenges of nuclear waste], Hedemora:Gidlunds.
2. Beck, U., 2004. Der kosmopolitische Blick–oder:Krieg its Frieden, Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp.
3. Berkhout, F., 1991. Radioactive waste:Politics and technology, London:Routledge.
4. Blowers, A., 1996. “ Transboundary transfers of hazardous and radioactive wastes ”. In Environmental problems as conflicts of interest, Edited by:Sloep, P.B., and Blowers, A., 151–86. London:Arnold.
5. Blowers, A., Lowry, D., and Solomon, B.D., 1991. The international politics of nuclear waste, London:Croom Helm.
6. Boholm, Å., and Löfstedt, R., eds. 2004. Facility siting:Risk, power and identity in land use planning, London:Earthscan.
7. Colglazier, E.W., ed. 1982. The politics of nuclear waste, New York:Pergamon.
8. Cramér, P., 2005. “ Nationell kärnbränslepolitik i en europeisk union? [National nuclear-fuel politics in a European Union] ”. In Kärnavfallsfrågans politiska utmaningar [Political challenges of nuclear waste], Edited by:Andrén, M., and Strandberg, U., 116–41. Hedemora:Gidlunds.
9. Darst, R.G., and Dawson, J.I., 200520052005. ‘Babtists and bootleggers, once removed’:The politics of radioactive waste internationalization in the European Union. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (2):17–37.
10. Dawson, J.I., and Darst, R.G., 200520052005. Russia’s proposal for a global nuclear waste repository:Safe, secure, and environmentally just?. Environment, 47 (4):10–21.
11. Dawson, J.I., and Darst, R.G., 2006. Meeting the challenge of permanent nuclear waste disposal in an expanding Europe:Transparency, trust and democracy. Environmental Politics, 15 (4):610–27.
12. Deese, D.A., 1982. “ A cross-national perspective on the politics of nuclear waste ”. In The politics of nuclear waste, Edited by:Colglazier, E.W., 63–97. New York:Pergamon.
13. Dunlap, R.E., Kraft, M.E., and Rosa, E.A., eds. 1993. Public reactions to nuclear waste:Citizens’ views of repository siting, Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
14. ElBaradei, M., 2005. Nobel Lecture 10 December 2005, Oslo, Norway, Stockholm:The Nobel Foundation. http://www.iaea.org/PrinterFriendly/NewsCenter/Statements/2005/ebsp2005n020.html
15. Freudenburg, W.R., and Rosa, E.A., 1984. Public reactions to nuclear power:Are there critical masses?, Boulder, CO:Westview.
16. Habermas, J., 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation, Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp.
17. Held, D., Goldblatt, D., McGrew, A., and Perraton, J., 1999. Global transformations:Politics, economics and culture, London:Polity.
18. Held, D., and Koenig-Archibugi, M., 2005. Global governance and public accountability, Malden, MA:Blackwell.
19. Högselius, P., 2005. Die deutsch-deutsche Geschichte des Kernkraftwerkes Greifswald, Berlin:Berliner Wissensschafts-Verlag.
20. Jonas, H., 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, Frankfurt am Main:Insel.
21. Kaijser, A., and Högselius, P., 2007. SKB Rapport R-07-37 Resurs eller avfall? Politiken kring hanteringen av använt kärnbränsle i Finland, Tyskland, Ryssland och Japan [Resource or waste? The politics around the management of spent nuclear fuel in Finland, Germany, Russia and Japan], Stockholm:Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB).
22. Kemp, P., 1991. Det oersättliga. En teknologietik, Stockholm:Symposion.
23. Lidskog, R., and Andersson, A.-C., 2002. The management of radioactive waste:A description of ten countries, Stockholm:Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB).
24. Lidskog, R., and Sundqvist, G., 2004. On the right track? Technology, geology and society in Swedish nuclear waste management. Journal of Risk Research, 7 (2):251–68.
25. Openshaw, S., Carver, S., and Fernie, J., 1989. Britain’s nuclear waste:Safety and siting, London:Belhaven Press.
26. Owens, S., 2004. Siting, sustainable development and social priorities. Journal of Risk Research, 7 (2):101–14.
27. Perera, J., 1985. China and Sudan want Germany’s nuclear waste. New Scientist, 107 (1472):24
28. Renn, O., 1998. Three decades of risk research:Accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1):49–71.
29. Rosa, E.A., Dunlap, R.E., and Kraft, M.E., 1993. “ Prospects for public acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository in the United States:Summary and implications ”. In Public reactions to nuclear waste:Citizens’ views of repository siting, Edited by:Dunlap, R.E., Kraft, M.E., and Rosa, E.A., 291–324. Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
30. Scott, J., 1998. “ Thin simplifications and practical knowledge:Métis ”. In Seeing like a state:How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, New Haven, CT/London:Yale University Press.
31. Sjöberg, L., and Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M., 2001. Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository. Journal of Risk Research, 4 (1):75–101.
32. Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C.K., Poumadère, M., and Mays, C., 2000. “ Nuclear power and the public:A comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States ”. In Cross-cultural risk perceptions:A survey of empirical studies, Edited by:Renn, O., and Rohrmann, B., 55–102. Amsterdam:Kluwer.
33. Solomon, B.D., Shelley, F.M., Pasqualetti, M.J., and Murauskas, G.T., 1987. Radioactive waste management policies in seven industrialized democracies. Geoforum, 18:415–31.
34. von Hippel, F.N., 2001. Plutonium and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. Science, 293 (5539):2397–8.
35. von Hippel, F.N., 2004. A comprehensive approach to elimination of highly-enriched-uranium from all nuclear-reactor fuel cycles. Science & Global Security, 12 (3):137–65.
36. von Hippel, F.N., 2008. Rethinking nuclear fuel recycling. Scientific American, 298 (5):88–93.