DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening [2]

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 371, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 578-

  Vrachnis, Nikolaos ^a   Vlachadis, Nikolaos ^a   Creatsas, Georgios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA SEQUENCE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KARYOTYPE; LETTER; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD PRENATAL ANEUPLOIDY SCREENING; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; TRISOMY;

DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; TRISOMY;

EID: 84905748619     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1405486     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or sec-ond- trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2001-11. (Pubitemid 41609093)
2. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG practice bulletin no. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:217-27.