Stomatal and mesophyll conductances to CO2 in different plant groups: Underrated factors for predicting leaf photosynthesis responses to climate change?

Plant Science

Volumn 226, Issue , 2014, Pages 41-48

  Flexas, Jaume ^a   Carriquí, Marc ^a   Coopman, Rafael E ^b   Gago, Jorge ^c   Galmés, Jeroni ^a   Martorell, Sebastià ^a   Morales, Fermín ^d   Diaz Espejo, Antonio ^e  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^d CSIC   (Spain)

^e INSTITUTO DE RECURSOS NATURALES Y AGROBIOLOGÍA DE SEVILLA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Angiosperms; Climatic change; Diffusive limitations; Ferns; Mesophyll conductance; Photosynthesis

Indexed keywords

FILICOPHYTA; GYMNOSPERMAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ACCLIMATIZATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FERN; GYMNOSPERM; MESOPHYLL CELL; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT STOMA;

ACCLIMATIZATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; FERNS; GYMNOSPERMS; MESOPHYLL CELLS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT STOMATA;

EID: 84905747140     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Lobell D.B., Gourdji S.M. The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:1686-1697.
2. IPCC Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York. T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. Plattner, M.M.B. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P.M. Midgley (Eds.).
3. 2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2859-2876.
4. 2?. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1997, 48:609-639.
5. 2 concentration: a test of current theories and perceptions. Glob. Change Biol. 1999, 5:723-741.
6. 2. New Phytol. 2005, 165:351-372.
7. 2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. New Phytol. 2013, 197:1077-1094.
8. Thomas R.B., Strain B.R. Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedling grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96:626-634.
9. 2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:10343-10347.
10. 2 from pre-industrial levels. Nature 1987, 327:617-618.
11. 2] in vascular plants. Oecologia 2013, 171:71-82.
12. 2 and temperature in wheat crops grown at varying levels of N supply in a Mediterranean environment. Plant Sci. 2005, 169:908-916.
13. 2 and optimization of water-use efficiency among land plants. New Phytol. 2009, 183:839-847.
14. Gago J., Coopman R.E., Cabrera H.M., Hermida C., Molins A., Conesa M.A., Galmés J., Ribas-Carbó M., Flexas J. Photosynthesis limitations in three fern species. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 149:599-611.
15. Ruszala E.M., Beerling D.J., Franks P.J., Chater C., Casson S.A., Gray J.E., Hetnerington A.M. Land plants acquired active stomatal control early in their evolutionary history. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1-6.
16. Chater C., Kamisugi Y., Movahedi M., Fleming A., Cuming C., Gray J.E., Beerling D.J. Regulatory mechanism controlling stomatal behaviour conserved across 400 million years of land plant evolution. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1025-1029.
17. 2] enrichment (FACE) stimulates photosynthesis while decreasing in vivo Rubisco capacity. Planta 2005, 220:434-446.
18. 2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:134-144.
19. 2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2012, 193-194:70-84.
20. Bernacchi C.J., Portis A.R., Nakano H., von Caemmerer S., Long S.P. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130:1992-1998.
21. Diaz-Espejo A., Nicolás E., Fernández J.E. Seasonal evolution of diffusional limitations and photosynthetic capacity in olive under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:922-933.
22. 2? A test with Eucalyptus regnans. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28:11-19.
23. 2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:602-621.
24. Scafaro A.P., von Caemmerer S., Evans J.R., Atwell B.J. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance in cultivated and wild Oryza species with contrasting mesophyll cell wall thickness. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34:1999-2008.
25. Evans J.R., von Caemmerer S. Temperature response of carbon isotope discrimination and mesophyll conductance in tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36:745-756.
26. Walker B., Ariza L.S., Kaines S., Badger M.R., Cousins A.B. Temperature response of in vivo Rubisco kinetics and mesophyll conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana: comparisons to Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36:2108-2119.
27. Yamori W., Noguchi K., Hanba Y.T., Terashima I. Effects of internal conductance on the temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate in spinach leaves from contrasting growth temperatures. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47:1069-1080.
28. Fares S., Mahmood T., Liu S., Loreto F., Centritto M. Influence of growth temperature and measuring temperature on isoprene emission, diffusive limitations of photosynthesis and respiration in hybrid poplars. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45:155-161.
29. Bunce J.A. Variable responses of mesophyll conductance to substomatal carbon dioxide concentration in common bean and soybean. Photosynthetica 2010, 48:507-512.
30. 2 and irradiance in Eucalyptus seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:5335-5346.
31. 2 concentration around leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:1284-1298.
32. 2, and irradiance on mesophyll conductance in sclerophylls. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2303-2314.
33. 2 concentrations. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34:580-591.
34. 2 and high temperature. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:2629-2637.
35. 2 concentration and abscisic acid. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2315-2323.
36. 2 diffusion in wheat leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2291-2301.
37. 2 effects on mesophyll conductance and its consequences for interpreting photosynthetic physiology. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 27:41-50.
38. Salazar-Parra C., Aguirreolea J., Sánchez-Díaz M., Irigoyen J.J., Morales F. Photosynthetic response of Tempranillo grapevine to climate change scenarios. Ann. App. Biol. 2012, 161:277-292.
39. Tholen D., Ethier G., Genty B., Pepi S., Zhu X.G. Variable mesophyll conductance revisited. Theoretical background and experimental implications. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35:2087-2103.
40. 2 and irradiance estimated with the variable J and online isotope discrimination methods. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37:1231-1249.
41. 3 species. Planta 1980, 149:78-90.
42. 3 plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 1991, 18:287-305.
43. 2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27:137-153.
44. Galmés J., Conesa M.À., Díaz-Espejo A., Mir A., Perdomo J.A., Niinemets Ü., Flexas J. Rubisco catalytic properties optimized for present and future climatic conditions. Plant Sci. 2014, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.01.008.
45. 2-concentrating mechanisms in algae. Can. J. Bot. 1998, 76:1052-1071.
46. Galmés J., Flexas J., Keys A.J., Cifre J., Mitchell R.A.C., Madgwick P.J., Haslam R.P., Medrano H., Parry M.A.J. Rubisco specificity factor tends to be larger in plant species from drier habitats and in species with persistent leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:571-579.
47. Savir Y., Noor E., Milo R., Tlusty T. Cross-species analysis traces adaptation of Rubisco toward optimality in a low-dimensional landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:3475-3480.
48. 2-sequestering enzyme, Rubisco. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155:27-35.
49. Bird I.F., Cornelius M.J., Keys A.J. Affinity of RuBP carboxylases for carbon dioxide and inhibition of the enzymes by oxygen. J. Exp. Bot. 1982, 33:1004-1013.
50. Kent S.S., Tomany M.J. The differential of the ribulose 1,5.bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase specificity factor among higher plants and the potential for biomass enhancement. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1995, 33:71-80.
51. Makino A., Mae T., Ohira K. Photosynthesis and ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in rice leaves from emergence through senescence. Planta 1985, 166:414-420.
52. 2 specificity of Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 21:449-461.
53. Niinemets Ü., Cescatti A., Rodeghiero M., Tosens T. Leaf internal diffusion conductance limits photosynthesis more strongly in older leaves of Mediterranean evergreen broad-leaved species. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:1552-1566.
54. Bown H.E., Watt M.S., Mason E.G., Clinton P.W., Whitehead D. The influence of nitrogen and phosphorus supply and genotype on mesophyll conductance limitations to photosynthesis in Pinus radiata. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29:1143-1151.
55. Jin S.H., Huang J.Q., Li X.Q., Zheng B.S., Wu J.S., Wang Z.J., Liu G.H., Chen M. Effects of potassium supply on limitations of photosynthesis by mesophyll diffusion conductance in Carya cathayensis. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31:1142-1151.
56. 2. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:136-142.
57. Brodribb T.J., McAdam S.A. Stomatal (mis) behaviour. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31:1039-1040.
58. 2 in two divergent conifer species. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:195-203.
59. McAdam S.A.M., Brodribb T.J. Stomatal innovation and the rise of seed plants. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15:1-8.
60. McAdam S.A.M., Brodribb T.J. Ancestral stomatal control results in a canalization of fern and lycophyte adaptation to drought. New Phytol. 2013, 198:429-441.
61. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:258-270.
62. Galmés J., Medrano H., Flexas J. Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. New Phytol. 2007, 175:81-93.
63. Flexas J., Diaz-Espejo A., Gago J., Gallé A., Galmés J., Gulías J., Medrano H. Photosynthetic limitations in Mediterranean plants: a review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 103:12-23.
64. Schneider H., Schuettpelz E., Pryer K.M., Cranfill R., Magallon S., Lupia R. Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms. Nature 2004, 428:553-557.