The measurement of household consumption expenditures

Annual Review of Economics

Volumn 6, Issue , 2014, Pages 475-501

  Browning, Martin ^a   Crossley, Thomas F ^b,c   Winter, Joachim ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL STUDIES   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

administrative data; expenditure; measurement error; survey data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905681636     PISSN: 19411383     EISSN: 19411391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041247     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Aguiar M, Hurst E. 2007. Life-cycle prices and production. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1533-59
2. Ahmed N, Brzozowski M, Crossley TF. 2006. Measurement errors in recall food consumption data. Work. Pap. W06/21, Inst. Fisc. Stud., London
3. Angrisani M, Kapteyn A. 2014. Measuring household spending and payment habits: the role of "typical" and "specific" time frames in survey questions. See Carroll et al. 2014
4. Attanasio O, Blow L, Hamilton R, Leicester A. 2009. Booms and busts: consumption, house prices and expectations. Economica 71:20-50
5. Attanasio O, Davis S. 1996. Relative wage movements and the distribution of consumption. J. Polit. Econ. 104:1227-62
6. Attanasio O, Deleire T. 2002. The effect of Individual Retirement Accounts on household consumption and national saving. Econ. J. 112:504-38
7. Attanasio O, Hurst E, Pistaferri L. 2014. The evolution of income, consumption, and leisure inequality in the US, 1980-2010. See Carroll et al. 2014
8. Attanasio O, Pistaferri L. 2014. Consumption inequality over the last half century: some evidence using the new PSID consumption measure. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:122-26
9. Attanasio O, Weber G. 1993. Consumption growth, the interest rate and aggregation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60:631-50
10. Attanasio O, Weber G. 1994. The UK consumption boom of the late 1980s: aggregate implications of microeconomic evidence. Econ. J. 104:1269-302
11. Baker SR. 2013. Debt and the consumption response to household income shocks. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
12. Barrett G, Levell P, Milligan K. 2014.Acomparison of micro and macro expenditure measures across countries using differing survey methods. See Carroll et al. 2014
13. Battistin E, Miniaci R, Weber G. 2003. What do we learn from recall consumption data? J. Hum. Resour. 38:354-85
14. Battistin E, Padula M. 2013. Survey instruments and the reports of consumption expenditures: evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Surveys. Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Padova, Univ. Venice
15. Baugh B, Ben-David I, Park H. 2014. Disentangling financial constraints, precautionary savings, and myopia: household behavior surrounding federal tax returns. NBER Work. Pap. 19783
16. Bee A, Meyer BD, Sullivan JX. 2014. The validity of consumption data: Are the Consumer Expenditure Interview and Diary Surveys informative? See Carroll et al. 2014
17. Blundell R, Pistaferri L, Preston I. 2004. Imputing consumption in the PSID using demand estimates from the CEX. Work. Pap. W04/27, Inst. Fisc. Stud., London
18. Blundell R, Pistaferri L, Preston I. 2008. Consumption inequality and partial insurance. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:1887-921
19. Bonke J, Browning M. 2009. The allocation of expenditures within the household: a new survey. Fisc. Stud. 30:461-81
20. Bottazzi R, Crossley TF, ODea C. 2008. UKHLS Innovation Panel consumption questions: preliminary analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Inst. Fisc. Stud., London
21. Brewer M, Etheridge B, ODea C. 2013. Why are households that report the lowest incomes so well-off? Discuss. Pap. 736, Econ. Dep., Univ. Essex
22. Broda C, Leibtag E, Weinstein DE. 2009. The role of prices in measuring the poors living standards. J. Econ. Perspect. 23(2):77-97
23. Browning M, Crossley TF. 2000. Luxuries are easier to postpone: a proof. J. Polit. Econ. 108:1022-26
24. Browning M, Crossley TF. 2001. Unemployment insurance levels and consumption changes. J. Public Econ. 80:1-23
25. Browning M, Crossley TF. 2008. The long-run costs of job loss as measured by consumption changes. J. Econom. 145:109-20
26. Browning M, Crossley TF. 2009. Are two cheap, noisy measures better than one expensive, accurate one? Am. Econ. Rev. 99:99-103
27. Browning M, Crossley TF, Weber G. 2003. Asking consumption questions in general purpose surveys. Econ. J. 113:F540-67
28. Browning M, Gørtz M, Leth-Petersen S. 2013. Housing wealth and consumption: a micro panel study. Econ. J. 123:401-28
29. Browning M, Leth-Petersen S. 2003. Imputing consumption from income and wealth information. Econ. J. 113:F282-301
30. Brzozowski M, Crossley TF. 2011. Measuring the well-being of the poor with income or consumption: a Canadian perspective. Can. J. Econ. 44:88-106
31. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. 2011. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 111:92-102
32. Campbell JY, Cocco JF. 2007. How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data. J. Monet. Econ. 3:591-621
33. Card D, Chetty R, Feldstein M, Saez E. 2010. Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. White Pap., Natl. Sci. Found., Arlington, VA
34. Carroll C, Crossley TF, Sabelhaus J, eds. 2014. Improving the Measurement of Consumer Expenditures. NBER Ser. Stud. Income Wealth. Cambridge, MA: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. In press
35. Cherchye L, De Rock B, Vermeulen F. 2012. Married with children: a collective labor supply model with detailed time use and intrahousehold expenditure information. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:3377-405
36. Comerford D, Delaney L, Harmon C. 2009. Experimental tests of survey responses to expenditure questions. Fisc. Stud. 30:419-33
37. Crossley TF, de Bresser J, Delaney L, Winter J. 2014. Can survey participation alter household saving behaviour? Unpublished manuscript, Inst. Fisc. Stud., London
38. Crossley TF, Winter JK. 2014. Asking households about expenditures: What have we learned? See Carroll et al. 2014
39. Scrimshaw NS, Gordon JE, eds. 1968. Malnutrition, Learning, and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
40. Deaton A. 1992. Understanding Consumption. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
41. Deaton A, Grosh M. 2000. Consumption. In Designing Household Survey Questionnaires for Developing Countries: Lessons fromTen Years of LSMSExperience, ed.MGrosh, PGlewwe, pp. 91-133.Washington, DC: World Bank
42. Deaton A, Kozel V. 2005. Data and dogma: the great Indian poverty debate. World Bank Res. Obs. 20:177-99
43. Edgar J. 2009. What does usual usually mean? Unpublished manuscript, Bur. Labor Stat., Washington, DC
44. Edgar J, Nelson DV, Paszkiewicz L, Safir A. 2013. The Gemini Project to redesign the Consumer Expenditure Survey: redesign proposal. Rep., Bur. Labor Stat., Washington, DC
45. Einav L, Levin JD. 2013. The data revolution and economic analysis. NBER Work. Pap. 19035
46. Fricker S, Kopp B, To N. 2014. Exploring a balance edit approach in the Consumer Expenditure Quarterly Interview Survey. See Carroll et al. 2014
47. Gieseman R. 1987. The Consumer Expenditure Survey: quality control by comparative analysis. Mon. Labor Rev. 1987(3):8-14
48. Goldenberg K, Ryan J. 2009. Evolution and change in the Consumer Expenditure Surveys: adapting to meet changing needs. Unpublished manuscript, Bur. Labor Stat.
49. Gray M, Constantine R, dArdenne J, Blake M, Uhrig SCN. 2008. Cognitive testing of Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal StudyQuestionnaire. Underst. Soc.Work. Pap. Ser. 2008-04, Univ. Essex
50. Gray PG. 1955. The memory factor in social surveys. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:344-63
51. Griffith R, Leibtag E, Leicester A, Nevo A. 2009. Consumer shopping behavior: How much do consumers save? J. Econ. Perspect. 23(2):99-120
52. Grootaert C. 1986. Use of multiple diaries in a household expenditure survey in Hong Kong. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81:938-44
53. Guvenen F. 2007. Learning your earning: Are labor income shocks really very persistent? Am. Econ. Rev. 97:687-712
54. Heffetz O, Ligett K. 2013. Privacy and data-based research. NBER Work. Pap. 19433
55. Hurd M, McFadden D, Chand H, Gan L, Merrill A, Roberts M. 1998. Consumption and savings balances of the elderly: experimental evidence on survey response bias. In Frontiers in the Economics of Aging, ed. D Wise, pp. 353-87. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
56. Hurd M, Rohwedder S. 2009. Methodological innovations in collecting spending data: theHRSConsumption and Activities Mail Survey. Fisc. Stud. 30:435-59
57. Hurd M, Rohwedder S. 2010. The effects of the financial crisis and the great recession on American households. NBER Work. Pap. 16407
58. Hurd MD, Rohwedder S. 2014. Measuring total household spending in a monthly Internet survey: evidence from American Life Panel. See Carroll et al. 2014
59. Jacobs E, Shipp S. 1993. A history of the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey: 1935-36 to 1988-89. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 19:59-96
60. Jolliffe D. 2001. Measuring absolute and relative poverty: the sensitivity of estimated household consumption to survey design. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 27:1-23
61. Kapteyn A, Ypma JY. 2007. Measurement error and misclassification: a comparison of survey and administrative data. J. Labor Econ. 25:513-51
62. Kemsley WFF, Nicholson JL. 1960. Some experiments in methods of conducting family expenditure surveys. J. R. Stat. Soc. 123:307-28
63. Kemsley WFF, Redpath RU, Holms M. 1980. Family Expenditure SurveyHandbook. London: Off. Popul. Surv.
64. Koijen R, Nieuwerburgh SV, Vestman R. 2014. Judging the quality of survey data by comparison with "truth" as measured by administrative records: evidence from Sweden. See Carroll et al. 2014
65. Kreiner CT, Lassen DD, Leth-Petersen S. 2014. Measuring the accuracy of survey responses using administrative register data: evidence from Denmark. See Carroll et al. 2014
66. Krueger D, Perri F, Pistaferri L, Violante GL. 2010. Cross-sectional facts for macroeconomists. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 13:1-14
67. Kreuter F, Eckman S, Jaeckle A, Kirchner A, Presser S, Tourangeau R. 2012. Mechanisms of misreporting to filter questions. Presented at AAOPR Annu. Conf., 67th, Orlando, FL
68. Kreuter F, McCulloch S, Presser S, Tourangeau R. 2011. The effects of asking filter questions in interleafed versus grouped format. Sociol. Methods Res. 40:88-104
69. Kuchler T. 2013. Sticking to your plan: hyperbolic discounting and credit card debt paydown. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford Univ.
70. Leicester A. 2014. Using scanner data to construct detailed weights for certain categories of spending. See Carroll et al. 2014
71. Li G, Schoeni RF, Danziger S, Charles KK. 2010. New expenditure data in the PSID: comparisons with the CE. Mon. Labor Rev. 133:29-39
72. Manski CF, Tamer E. 2002. Inference on regressions with interval data on a regressor or outcome. Econometrica 70:519-46
73. McKenzie J. 1983. The accuracy of telephone call data collected by diary methods. J. Mark. Res. 20:417-27
74. McWhinney I, Champion H. 1974. The Canadian experience with recall and diary methods in consumer expenditure surveys. In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 3, ed. SV Berg, pp. 113-140. Cambridge, MA: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.
75. Meghir C, Robin JM. 1992. Frequency of purchase and the estimation of demand systems. J. Econom. 53:53-85
76. Meijer E, Rohwedder S, Wansbeek T. 2011. Measurement error in earnings data: using a mixture model approach to combine survey and register data. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 30:191-201
77. Meyer BD, Sullivan JX. 2003. Measuring the well-being of the poor using income and consumption. J. Hum. Resour. 38:S1180-220
78. Meyer BD, Sullivan JX. 2004. The effects of welfare and tax reform: the material well-being of single mothers in the 1980s and 1990s. J. Public Econ. 88:1387-420
79. Meyer BD, Sullivan JX. 2008. Changes in the consumption, income, and well-being of single mother headed families. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:2221-41
80. Meyer BD, Sullivan JX. 2011. Viewpoint: further results on measuring the well-being of the poor using income and consumption. Can. J. Econ. 44:52-87
81. Meyer B, Sullivan J. 2012. Winning the war: poverty from the great society to the great recession. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 45:133-200
82. Natl. Res. Counc. 2013. Measuring What We Spend: Toward a New Consumer Expenditure Survey. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
83. Neter J, Waksberg J. 1964. A study of response errors in expenditures data from household interviews. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 59:18-55
84. Palumbo MG. 1999. Uncertain medical expenses and precautionary saving near the end of the life cycle. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66:395-421
85. Parker J, Souleles NS, Johnson DS, McClelland R. 2013. Consumer spending and the economic stimulus payments of 2008. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:2530-53
86. Pradhan M. 2009. Welfare analysis with a proxy consumption measure: evidence from a repeated experiment in Indonesia. Fisc. Stud. 30:391-417
87. Pudney S. 2007. Heaping and leaping: survey response behavior and the dynamics of self-reported consumption expenditure. Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Essex
88. Rubin DC, Baddeley AD. 1989. Telescoping is not time compression: a model of the dating of autobiographical events. Mem. Cognit. 17:653-61
89. Sabelhaus J, Groen JA. 2000. Can permanent-income theory explain cross-sectional consumption patterns? Rev. Econ. Stat. 82:431-38
90. Sabelhaus J, Johnson D, Ash S, Swanson D, Garner T, et al. 2014. Is the Consumer Expenditure Survey representative by income? See Carroll et al. 2014
91. Safir A, Goldenberg KL. 2008. Mode effects in a survey of consumer expenditures. Unpublished manuscript, Bur. Labor Stat., Washington, DC. http://www.bls.gov/cex/cesrvymethssafir1.pdf
92. Sakshaug JW, Kreuter F. 2012. Assessing the magnitude of non-consent biases in linked survey and administrative data. Surv. Res. Methods 6:113-22
93. Sakshaug JW, Couper MP, Ofstedal MB, Weir DR. 2012. Linking survey and administrative records: mechanisms of consent. Sociol. Methods Res. 41:535-69
94. Silberstein AR. 1990. First wave effects in the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey. Surv. Methodol. 16:293-304
95. Silberstein AR, Jacob CA. 1989. Symptoms of repeated interview effects in the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey. In Panel Surveys, ed. D Kasprzyk, G Duncan, G Kalton, MP Singh, pp. 289-303. New York: Wiley
96. Silberstein AR, Scott S. 1991. Expenditure diary surveys and their associated errors. In Measurement Errors in Surveys, ed. PP Biermer, RMGroves, LELyberg, NAMathiowetz, S Sudman, pp. 303-26.NewYork:Wiley
97. Skinner J. 1987. A superior measure of consumption from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Econ. Lett. 23:213-16
98. Stat. Can. 1999. 1996 Food Expenditure Survey, public-use microdata files. Income Stat. Div., Stat. Can., Ottawa
99. Stephens M. 2001. The long-run consumption effects of earning shocks. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83:28-36
100. Stephens M. 2003. "3rd of tha month": Do Social Security recipients smooth consumption between checks? Am. Econ. Rev. 93:406-22
101. Stephens M Jr. 2006. Paycheque receipt and the timing of consumption. Econ. J. 116:680-701
102. Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. 1996. Thinking About Answers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
103. Tanner S. 1998. How much do consumers spend? Comparing the FES and National Accounts. In How Reliable Is the Family Expenditure Survey, ed. J Banks, P Johnson, pp. 67-121. London: Inst. Fisc. Stud.
104. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
105. van Soest A, Hurd M. 2008.Atest for anchoring and yea-saying in experimental consumption data. J. Am.Stat. Assoc. 103:126-36
106. Velilla P. 2014. Micro and macro data on household income and wealth: mapping the Spanish Survey of Household Finances (EFF) with other statistical sources. Doc. Ocas., Banco Esp., Madrid
107. Winter J. 2002. Bracketing effects in categorized survey questions and the measurement of economic quantities. Discuss. Pap. 02-35, Univ. Mannheim
108. Winter J. 2004. Response bias in survey-based measures of household consumption. Econ. Bull. 3(9):1-12
109. Ziliak JP. 1998. Does the choice of consumption measure matter? An application to the permanent-income hypothesis. J. Monet. Econ. 41:201-16
110. Zwane A, Zinman J, Dusen EV, Pariente W, Null C, et al. 2011. Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:1821-26