Influences in CT scan lung nodule volumetry

Chest

Volumn 146, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Hochhegger, Bruno ^a   Marchiori, Edson ^a   Alves, Giordano Rafael Tronco ^b   Guimarães, Marcos Duarte ^c   Irion, Klaus ^d,e  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA   (Brazil)

^c A C CAMARGO CANCER CENTER   (Brazil)

^d LIVERPOOL HEART AND CHEST HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL LIVERPOOL AND BROADGREEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING PHANTOM; LETTER; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; VOLUMETRY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84905665940     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: 19313543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-0763     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Mehta HJ, Ravenel JG, Shaftman SR, et al. The utility of nodule volume in the context of malignancy prediction for small pulmonary nodules. Chest. 2014;145(3):464-472.
2. Gavrielides MA, Kinnard LM, Myers KJ, Petrick N. Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT. Radiology. 2009;251(1):26-37.
3. Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL. Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):989-994. (Pubitemid 46100197)
4. Xie X, Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, et al. Small irregular pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: observer detection sensitivity and volumetry accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(3):W202-W209.