His or para-His pacing preserves left ventricular function in atrioventricular block: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study

Europace

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1189-1196

  Kronborg, Mads B ^a   Mortensen, Peter T ^a   Poulsen, Steen H ^a   Gerdes, Jens C ^a   Jensen, Henrik K ^a   Nielsen, Jens C ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Atrioventricular block; His pacing; Left ventricular function; Pacing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; BIVENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART PACING; HIS BUNDLE; HIS PACING; HUMAN; IMPLANTED HEART PACEMAKER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; PARA HIS PACING; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QRS COMPLEX; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINUS NODE DISEASE; TISSUE DOPPLER IMAGING; TREATMENT DURATION; VENTRICULAR PACEMAKER; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEVICE; DENMARK; DEVICE FAILURE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXERCISE TEST; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE SEPTUM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; BUNDLE OF HIS; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEVICES; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENMARK; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, RIGHT; VENTRICULAR SEPTUM;

EID: 84905643973     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: 15322092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yu CM, Chan JY, Zhang Q, Omar R, Yip GW, Hussin A et al. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2009;361: 2123-34.
2. Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, McVeigh ER. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1735-42.
3. Kolb C, Schmidt R, Dietl JU, Weyerbrock S, Morgenstern M, Fleckenstein M et al. Reduction of right ventricular pacing with advanced atrioventricular search hysteresis: results of the PREVENT study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34:975-83.
4. Zanon F, Bacchiega E, Rampin L, Aggio S, Baracca E, PastoreGet al. Direct His bundle pacing preserves coronary perfusion compared with right ventricular apical pacing: a prospective, cross-over mid-term study. Europace 2008;10:580-7.
5. Catanzariti D, Maines M, Cemin C, Broso G, MarottaT, Vergara G. Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2006;16:81-92.
6. Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation 2000;101:869-77.
7. Occhetta E, Bortnik M, Magnani A, Francalacci G, Piccinino C, Plebani L et al. Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47: 1938-45.
8. Zanon F, Baracca E, Aggio S, Pastore G, Boaretto G, Cardano P et al. A feasible approach for direct his-bundle pacing using a new steerable catheter to facilitate precise lead placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:29-33.
9. Barba-Pichardo R, Morina-Vazquez P, Fernandez-Gomez JM, Venegas-Gamero J, Herrera-Carranza M. Permanent His-bundle pacing: seeking physiological ventricular pacing. Europace 2010;12:527-33.
10. Kronborg MB, Mortensen PT, Gerdes JC, Jensen HK, Nielsen JC. His and para-His pacing in AV block: feasibility and electrocardiographic findings. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2011;31:255-62.
11. Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, Marwick TH. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:878-86.
12. Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, Molhoek SG, Boersma E, Steendijk P et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1834-40.
13. Barold SS, Ovsyshcher IE. Pacemaker-induced mitral regurgitation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:357-60.
14. Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54: 764-76.
15. Zanon F, Barold SS. Direct His bundle and paraHisian cardiac pacing. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2012;17:70-8.
16. Padeletti L, Lieberman R, Schreuder J, Michelucci A, Collella A, Pieragnoli P et al. Acute effects of His bundle pacing versus left ventricular and right ventricular pacing on left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1556-60.
17. Kronborg MB, Poulsen SH, Mortensen PT, Nielsen JC. Left ventricular performance during para-His pacing in patients with high-grade atrioventricular block: an acute study. Europace 2012;14:841-6.
18. Cano O, Osca J, Sancho-Tello MJ, Sanchez JM, Ortiz V, Castro JE et al. Comparison of effectiveness of right ventricular septal pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1426-32.
19. Albouaini K, Alkarmi A, MudawiT,GammageMD,Wright DJ. Selective site right ventricular pacing. Heart 2009;95:2030-9.
20. Ng AC, Allman C, Vidaic J, Tie H, Hopkins AP, Leung DY. Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacingonleft ventricular synchronyand function in patients with second-or third-degree heart block. Am J Cardiol 2009;103: 1096-101.
21. Domenichini G, Sunthorn H, Fleury E, Foulkes H, Stettler C, Burri H. Pacing of the interventricular septum versus the right ventricular apex: a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Intern Med 2012;23:621-7.
22. Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC, Poulsen SH, Mortensen PT, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS et al. Biventricular pacing preserves left ventricular performance in patients with highgrade atrio-ventricular block: a randomized comparison with DDD(R) pacing in 50 consecutive patients. Europace 2008;10:314-20.
23. CurtisAB,Worley SJ, Adamson PB, Chung ES, Niazi I, Sherfesee L et al. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. NEngl JMed 2013;368:1585-93.
24. Albertsen AE, Mortensen PT, Jensen HK, Poulsen SH, Egeblad H, Nielsen JC. Adverse effect of right ventricular pacing prevented by biventricular pacing during long-termfollow-up: a randomized comparison. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:767-72.
25. Chan JY, Fang F, Zhang Q, Fung JW, Razali O, Azlan Het al. Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function: 2-year results of the PACE trial. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2533-40.