Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations

Archaeology and Language II: Correlating Archaeological and Linguistic Hypotheses

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 67-102

  Van Driem, George ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905609208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203202913     Document Type: Chapter

References (150)

1. Acherma, J. 1906. Onder de oorspronkelijke bewoners van Japan. De Revue van Uitvindingen en Ontdekkingen III (2), 81-8 (illustrated Dutch adaptation of the travelogue of an English woman).
2. Allchin, B. and F.R. Allchin 1968. The Birth of Indian Civilization. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
3. Allchin, B. and F.R. Allchin 1982. The Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Allchin, F.R. and N. Hammond 1978. The Archaeology of Afghanistan from Earliest Times to the Timurid Period. London: Academic Press.
5. Ān Zhìmǐn 1979a. Péilígǎng, Císhān hé Yǎngsháo: shìlùn zhòngyuán xīn shìqì wénhuà de yuānyuán jì fāzhǎn (Pèilìgǎng, Cìshān and Yǎngsháo: an exploration of the origin and development of Neolithic culture on the Central Plain). Káogǔ 4, 335-45, 334.
6. Ān Zhìmǐn 1979b. Lüèlùn sānshì nián lái wǒguó de xīn shíqì shídài káogǔ (A brief survey of archaeological explorations of the Neolithic in our country during the last thirty years). Káogǔ 5, 393-403.
7. Ān Zhìmǐn 1992. Neolithic communities in eastern parts of Central Asia. In History Civilizations of Central Asia, Volume 1, The Dawn of Civilization: earliest times to 700 bc, A.H. Dani and V.M. Masson (eds), 153-89. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
8. Batchelor, J. 1892. The Ainu of Japan: the religion, superstitions and general history of the hairy aborigines of Japan. London: Religious Tract Society.
9. Batchelor, J. 1901. The Ainu and their Folk-Lore. London: Religious Tract Society.
10. Batchelor, J. 1925. The Pit-Dwellers of Hokkaido and Ainu Place-Names Considered. Sapporo.
11. Batchelor, J. 1927. Amu Life and Lore: echoes of a departing race. Tokyo: Kyobunkwan.
12. Baxter III, W.H. 1992. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Baxter III, W.H. 1994. Some phonological correspondences between Chinese and Tibeto-Burman. In Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida and Yasuhiko Nagano (eds), 25-35. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
14. 14 Laboratory of the Institute of Archaeology of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) 1982. Shíhuīyán dìqū tàn-14 yàngpǐn niándài de kěkàoxìng yǔ Zèngpíyán děng yízhǐ de niándài wènti (Reliability of radiocarbon dates of samples from limestone regions and the problem of dating prehistoric sites of the Zèngpíyán type). Káogǔ Xuébào 2, 243-50.
15. Bellwood, P. 1978. Man's Conquest of the Pacific: the prehistory of Southeast Asia and Oceania. Auckland: Collins.
16. Benedict, P.K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: a conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Benedict, P.K. 1975. Austro-Thai: language and culture, with a glossary of roots. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Areas Files Press.
18. Benedict, P.K. 1976. Sino-Tibetan: another look. Journal of the American Oriental Society 96 (2), 167-97.
19. Benedict, P.K. 1990. Japanese/Austro-Tai (Linguistica Extranea Studia 20). Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
20. Benedict, P.K. 1991. Austric: an 'extinct' proto-language. In Austroasiatic Languages; essays in honour of H.L. Shorto, J.H.C.S. Davidson (Ed.), 7-11. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
21. Berger, H. 1974. Das Yasin-Burushaski. Grammatik, Texte, Wörterbuch. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
22. Blust, R.A. 1976. Austronesian culture history: some linguistic inferences and their relations to the archaeological record. World Archaeology 8 (1), 19-43.
23. Blust, R.A. 1977. The Proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian sub-grouping: a preliminary report. Working Papers in Linguistics of the Department of Linguistics of the University of Hawai'i 9 (2), 1-15.
24. Bodman, N.C. 1980. Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: data towards establishing the nature of the relationship. In Contributions to Historical Linguistics: issues and materials, F. van Coetsem and L.R. Waugh (eds), 34-199. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
25. Bodman, N.C. 1988. On the place of Lepcha in Sino-Tibetan: a lexical comparison Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11 (1), 1-26.
26. Bodman, N.C. 1989. Evidence for l and r medials in Old Chinese, in Graham Thurgood. In Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan Area: the state of the art -papers presented to Paul K. Benedict for his 71st birthday, Pacific Linguistics C-87, G. Thurgood, LA. Matisoff and D. Bradley (eds), 146-67. Canberra: Australian National University.
27. Boller, A. 1857. Nachweis, dass das Japanische zum ural-altaischen Stamme gehört. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, XXIII, 393-481.
28. Bradley, D. 1994a. Tibeto-Burman. In Atlas of the World's Languages, C. Mosely and R.E. Asher (eds), London: Routledge.
29. Bradley, D. 1994b. The sub-grouping of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. In Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida and Yasuhiko Nagano (eds). 59-78. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
30. Brouwer, H. 1643. Journael ende Historis Verhael van de Reyse gedaen by Oosten de Straet le Maire, naer de Custen van Chili, onder het beleyt van den Heer Generael Hendrick Brouwer inden Jare 1643 voor gevallen, vervatende der Chilesen manieren, handel ende ghewoonten, als mede een beschrjvinghe van het Eylandt Eso, ghelegen ontrent dertigh Mylen van het machtigh Rijcke van Japan, op de hooghte van 39 graden, 49 minuten, Noorder Breete, soo alst eerst in 't selvige jaer door het schip Castricum bezeylt is. Amsterdam: Broer Jansz.
31. Burling, R. 1983. The Sal languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 7 (2), 1-32
32. Caldwell, R. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages. London: Harrison & Sons.
33. Chamberlain, B.H. 1887a. The Language, Mythology, and Geographical Nomenclature of Japan Viewed in the Light of Aino Studies (Memoirs of the Literature College, Imperial University of Japan, no. I). Tokyo: Imperial University.
34. Chamberlain, B.H. 1887b. An Aino bear hunt. Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan XV, 126-39.
35. Chang Kwang-Chih (=Zhāng Guāngzhí) 1965. Relative chronologies of China to the end of Chou. In Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, R.W. Ehrich (Ed.), 503-26. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
36. Chang Kwang-Chih 1977. The Archaeology of Ancient China, 3rd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37. Chang Kwang-Chih 1986. The Archaeology of Ancient China, 4th edn, revised and enlarged. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Chang Kwang-Chih 1989. Xīn shíqì shídài de Táiwān hǎixiá (The Taiwan straits in the Neolithic period). Káogǔ 6, 541-50.
39. Chang Kwang-Chih 1992. China. In Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, 3rd edn, 2 vols, R.W. Ehrich (Ed.), I: 409-15, II: 385-404. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
40. Chang Te-Tzu 1983. The origins and early cultures of the cereal grains and food legumes. In The Origins of Chinese Civilization, D. N. Keightley (Ed.), 65-94. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Chêng Tê-K'un 1957. Archaeological Studies in Szechwan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Chêng Tê-K'un 1959. Archaeology in China, Volume I, Prehistoric China. Cambridge: W. Heffers.
43. Chêng Tê-K'un 1960. Archaeology in China, Volume II, Shang China. Cambridge: W. Heffers.
44. Colani, M. 1930. Recherches sur le préhistorique indochinois. Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient XXX, 299-422.
45. Dahl, O.C. 1973. Proto-Austronesian (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph Series no. 15). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
46. Dài Érjiǎn 1972. Xīzàng Nièlāmù xiàn fāxiàn de shíqì (Stone tools found in gNya'-lam county in Tibet). Kàogū 1, 43-4.
47. Dani, A.H. 1960. Prehistoty and Protohistory of Eastern India, with a Detailed Account of the Neolithic Cultures in Mainland Southeast Asia. Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay.
48. Diffloth, G. 1994. The lexical evidence for Austric, so far. Oceanic Linguistics 33 (2), 309-21.
49. Driem, G. van 1993a. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies LVI (2), 292-334.
50. Driem, G. van 1993b. Language change, conjugational morphology and the Sino-Tibetan Urheimat. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 26, 45-56.
51. Driem, G. van 1995. Black Mountain conjugational morphology, Proto-Tibeto-Burman morphosyntax, and the linguistic position of Chinese. In New Horizons in Tibeto-Burman Morphosyntax (Senri Ethnological Studies 41), Y. Nishi, J.A. Matisoff and Y. Nagano (eds), 229-59. Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
52. Driem, G. van 1997. Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60 (3), 455-88.
53. Dyen, I. 1965. Formosan evidence for some new Proto-Austronesian phonemes. Lingua, International Review of General Linguistics 14 (1), 285-305.
54. Edelberg, L. and S. Jones 1979. Nuristan. Graz: Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt.
55. Fairservis, W.A. Jr. 1976. Excavations at Allahdino I: seals and inscribed material. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
56. Fairservis, W.A. Jr. 1992. The Harappan Civilization and its Writing: a model for the decipherment of the Indus script. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
57. Fussman, G. 1972. Atlas linguistique des parlers dardes et kafirs, 2 vols. Paris: École Française d'Extrême-Orient.
58. Glover, I.C. 1973. Late Stone Age traditions in South-East Asia. In South Asian Archaeology, N. Hammond (Ed.), 51-65. London: Duckworth.
59. Glover, I.C. 1977. The Hoabinhian: hunter-gatherers or early agriculturalists in SouthEast Asia? In Hunters, Gatherers and First Farmers beyond Europe: an archaeological survey, J.V.S. Megaw (ed.), 145-66. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
60. Glover, I.C. 1985. Some problems relating to the domestication of rice in Asia. In Recent Advances in Indo-Pacific Prehistory: Proceedings of the International Symposium held at Poona, December 19-21, 1978, V.N. Misra and P. Bellwood (eds) 265-74. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
61. Hallo well, A.I. 1926. Bear ceremonialism in the northern hemisphere. American Anthropologist (n.s.) 28 (1), 1-175.
62. Haudricourt, A.-G. and L. Hédin 1987. L'Homme et les plantes cultivées. Paris: Éditions A.-M. Métailié.
63. Heine-Geldern, R. von 1932. Urheimat und früheste Wanderungen der Austronesier. Anthropos, Revue Internationale d'Ethnologie et de Linguistique XXVII, 543-619.
64. Heine-Geldern, R. von 1945. Prehistoric research in the Netherlands Indies. In Science and Scientists in the Netherlands Indies, P. Honig and F. Verdoorn (eds), 129-67. New York: Board for the Netherlands Indies, Surinam and Curaçao of New York City.
65. Hinz, W. and H. Koch 1987. Elamisches Wörterbuch (in 2 Teilen, Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran herausgegeben vom Deutschen Archäologischen Institut, Abteilung Teheran, Ergänzungsband 17), Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
66. Hudson, M.J. 1990. From Toro to Yoshinogari: Changing perspectives on Yayoi period achaeology. In Hoabinhian, fonion, Yayoi, Early Korean States: bibliographic reviews of Far Eastern archaeology 1990, G.L. Barnes (ed.), 63-111. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
67. Hunter, G.R. 1934. The Script of Harappa and Mohenjodaro and its Connection with Other Scripts. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
68. Jettmar, K. et al. 1975. Die Religionen des Hindukusch. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer
69. Kortlandt, F.H.H. 1989. Eight Indo-Uralic verbs? Mülnchener Studien zur Sprach-wissenschaft 50: 79-85.
70. Kortlandt, F.H.H. 1990. The spread of the Indo-Europeans. Journal of Indo-European Studies 18, 131-40.'
71. Kuiper, F.B.J. 1948. Proto-Munda Words in Sanskrit (Verhandelmg der koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks LI, nr. 3). Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.
72. Kuiper, F.B.J. 1950. An Austro-Asiatic myth in the Rigveda. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen XXIII (7), 163-83 [later recanted, e.g. in Kuiper 1991].
73. Kuiper, F.B.J. 1954. Two Rigvedic loanwords. In Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung: Festschrift Albert Debrunner gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, 241-50. Bern: Francke Verlag.
74. Kuiper, F.B.J. 1955. Rigvedic loanwords. In Studia Indologica: Festschrift für Willibald Kirfel zur Vollendung seines 70. Lebensjahres, O. Spies (Ed.), 137-85. Bonn: Selbstverlag des Orientalischen Seminars der Universität Bonn.
75. Kuiper, F.B.J. 1991. Aryans in the Rigveda (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 1). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
76. Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C. 1972a. Trade mechanisms in Indus-Mesopotamian interrelations. Journal of the American Oriental Society 92 (2), 222-9.
77. Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C. 1972b. Tepe Yahyā 1971: Mesopotamia and the Indo-Iranian borderlands. Iran, 10, 89-100.
78. Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C. 1978. The Proto-Elamites on the Iranian plateau. Antiquity, 52, 114-20.
79. Lien Chao-mei 1990. The Neolithic archaeology of Taiwan and the Peinan excavations. In Indo-Pacific Prehistory 1990: Papers from the 14th Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Congress, Yogyakarta, P. Bellwood (Ed.), II: 339-52. Canberra: Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association.
80. Lorimer, D.L.R. 1935. The Burushaski Language (lnstituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning, Serie B: Skrifter XXIX, vol. 1 'Introduction and Grammar', vol. 2 'Texts and Translations'). Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co. (W. Nygaard).
81. Lorimer, D.L.R. 1962. Werchikwar English Vocabulary, with a Few Werchikwar Texts (lnstituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning, Serie B: Skrifter LI). Oslo. Universitets Forlaget.
82. McAlpin, D.W. 1974. Toward Proto-EIamo-Dravidian, Language 50, 89-101.
83. McAlpin, D.W. 1975. Elamite and Dravidian: further evidence of relationship (with comments by M.B. Emenau, William H. Jacobsen, Jr., F.B.J. Kuiper, Herbert H. Paper, Erica Reiner, Roman Stopa, François Vallat, Roger W. Westcott, and a reply by David W. McAlpin). Current Anthropology 16 (1), 105-15.
84. McAlpin, D.W. 1981. Proto-EIamo-Dravidian: the evidence and its implications (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Volume 71, Part 3). Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.
85. McNeill, W.H. 1976. Plagues and Peoples. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
86. Mallory, J.P. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, archaeology and myth. London: Thames & Hudson.
87. Maraini, F. 1991. Iyomande: ein interview. In Bärenfest, T. Kaiser (Ed.), 29-54. Zurich: Völkerkundemuseum der Universität Zurich.
88. Masica, C.P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan Languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Matisoff, J.A. 1994. Regularity and variation in Sino-Tibetan. In Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, H. Kitamura, T. Nishida and Y. Nagano (eds), 36-58. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
90. Matthews, J.M. 1966. A review of the 'Hoabinhian' in Indo-China. Asian Perspectives, 9, 86-95.
91. Meacham, W. 1983. Origins and development of the Yüeh Coastal Neolithic: a microcosm of culture change on the mainland of East Asia. In The Origins of Chinese Civilization, D.N. Keightley (Ed.), 147-75. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
92. Miller, R.A. 1980. Origins of the Japanese Language: lectures in Japan during the academic year 1977-78. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
93. Morgenstierne, G. 1973. Irano-Dardica. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag. Morin, Y.C. and É. Tiffou. 1989. Dictionnaire complémentaire du bourouchaski du Yasin (Études bourouchaski 2, SELAF no. 304). Paris: Peeters/SELAF.
94. Nakamura Gorou 1993. The origins of rice cultivation: problems associated with finds of rice and ishibocho in the northern Indian subcontinent. Bulletin of the Ancient Orient Museum, Tokyo 14, 53-117.
95. Oka Masao. 1930. Das Bärenfest bei den Ainu. Anthropos XXV, 1108-90.
96. Parpola, A. 1994. Deciphering the Indus Script. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97. Patrie, J. 1982. The Genetic Relationship of the Ainu Language. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
98. Paulson, I. 1965. Die rituelle Erhebung des Bärenschädels bei arktischen und subark-tischen Völkern. Temenos: Studies in Comparative Religion, 150-69.
99. Pearson, R. 1983. The Ch'ing-lien-kang culture and the Chinese Neolithic. In The Origins of Chinese Civilization, D.N. Keightley (Ed.), 119-45. Berkeley: University of California Press.
100. Pilsudski, B. 1909. Das Bärenfast der Ajnen auf Sachalin. Globus, Illustrierte Zeitschrift für Läuder-und Völkerkunde XCVI (3), 37-41; XCVI (4), 53-60.
101. Pilsudski, B. 1914. Na medvěž'em" prazdnikě Ajnov" ostrova Saxalina. Živaia Starina XXIII, (1-2), 67-162.
102. Pittioni, R. 1978. Die Steingeräte von Lho'Seumaweh, Kreis Atjeh, Nord-Sumatra: zur Fomienkunde des 'Hoabinhian' in Südost-Asien (Denkschriften der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 132. Band). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
103. Possehl, G.L. and PC. Rissmann. 1992. The chronology of prehistoric India: from earliest times to the Iron Age. In Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, 3rd edn, 2 vols, R.W. Ehrich (Ed.), I: 465-90. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
104. Puhvel, J. 1994. West-lndo-European affinities of Anatolian. In Früh-, Mittel-, Spätindogermanisch: Akten der IX Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Geselhchaft vom 5 bis 9. Oktober 1992 in Zürich, G.E. Dunkel, G. Meyer, S. Scarlata and C. Seidl (eds), 315-24. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
105. Pulleyblank, E.G. 1983. The Chinese and their neighbours in prehistoric and early historic times. In The Origins of Chinese Civilization, D.N. Keightley (Ed.), 411-66. Berkeley: University of California Press.
106. Ramachandran, K.S. 1989. Neolithic: northwestern region. In An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology, 2 vols. A. Ghosh (Ed.), I: 49-52. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
107. Reid, L.A. 1994. Morphological evidence for Austric. Oceanic Linguistics 33 (2), 323-44.
108. Reynolds, T.E.G. 1990. The Hoabinhian: a review. In Hoabinhian, Jomon, Yayoi, Early Korean States: bibliographic reviews of Far Eastern archaeology, G.L. Barnes (Ed.), 1-30. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
109. Sagart, L. 1990. Chinese and Austronesian are genetically related. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of Texas at Arlington, 5-7 October.
110. Sagart, L. 1994. Proto-Austronesian and Old Chinese evidence for Sino-Austronesian Oceanic Linguistics 33 (2), 271-308.
111. Scheube B. 1880. Der Baerencultus und die Baerenfeste der Ainos mit einigen Bemerkungen ueber die Taenze derselben. Mittheilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Natur-und Völkerkunde Ostasiens III (2), 44-51.
112. Schmidt, W. 1906. Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentral-Asiens und Austronesiens. Archiv für Anthropologic 5, 59-109.
113. Shafer, R. 1955. Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word, Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York 11, 94-111.
114. Shafer, R. 1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
115. Shào Wàngpíng 1984a. Huánghé liúyù de xīn shíqì shídài wénhuà (The Neolithic culture of the Yellow River basin). In Xīn Zhōngguó de káogǔfāxiàn hé yánjiū (Archaeological Excavations and Researches in the New China) 33-41. Wénhuà Chūbǎn-shè. Peking: Archaeological Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
116. Shào Wàngpíng 1984b. Huánghé zhōngliú de Yǎngsháo wénhuà (The Yǎngsháo culture along the middle course of the Yellow River). In Xīn Zhongguó de káogǔ fāxiàn hé yánjiū (Archaeological Excavations and Researches in the New China), 41-68. Wénhuà Chūbǎn shè. Peking: The Archaeological Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
117. Sharif, M., and B.K. Thapar 1992. Food-producing communities in Pakistan and northern India. In History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Volume 1, The Dawn of Civilization: earliest times to 700 BC, A.H. Dani and V.M. Masson (eds), 127-51. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
118. Sharma, A.K. 1981. Prehistoric explorations in Sikkim. Purātattva, Bulletin of the Indian Archaeological Society 10 (1978-9), 82-3.
119. Sharma, G.R. 1985. From hunting and food gathering to domestication of plants and animals in the Belan and Ganga valleys. In Recent Advances in Indo-Pacific Prehistory: Proceedings of the International Symposium held at Poona, December 19-21, 1978, V.N. Misra and P. Bellwood (eds), 369-71. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
120. Sharma, T.C. 1967. A note on the Neolithic pottery of Assam. Man, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 2 (1), 126-8.
121. Sharma, T.C. 1981. The Neolithic pattern of North-Eastern India. In Madhu: Recent Researches in Indian Archaeology and Art History, M.S. Nagaraja Rao (Ed.), 41-52. Delhi: Again Kala Prakashan.
122. Sharma, T.C. 1989. Neolithic: eastern region. In An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology, 2 vols, A. Ghosh (Ed.), I: 58-60. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
123. Siebold, P.F.B. von 1826. Epitome linguae japonicae. Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 11, 63-136.
124. Siebold, P.F.B. von 1832. Verhandelmg over de afkomst der Japanners. Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 13, 183-275.
125. Siebold, P.F.B. von 1858. Aardrijks-en Volkenkundigc Toelichtingen tot de Ontdekkingen van Maerten Gerritsz. Vries, met het fluitschip Castricum A° 1643, in 't Oosten en 't Noorden van Japan, dienende tot Zeemansgids langs de Oostkunst van Japan naar de eilanden Jezo, Krafto en de Kurilen. In Reize van Maarten Gerritsz. Vries in 1643 naar het Noorden en Oosten van Japan volgens het Journaal gehouden door C.J. Coen, op het schip Castricum, naar het handschrift uitgegeven en met belangrijke bijlagen vermeerderd met de daarbij behoorende kaart en eenige fac-similés, en geographische en ethnographische aanteekeningen, tevens dienende tot een zeemansgids naar Jezo, Krafto en de Kurilen, en stukken over de taal en voortbrengselen der Aino-Landen, P.A. Leupe (Ed.), 263-440. Amsterdam: Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch Indië.
126. Stacul, G. 1969. Excavation near Ghālīgai (1968) and chronological sequence of protohistorical cultures m the Swāt Valley. East and West XIX, 44-91.
127. Stacul, G. 1987. Prehistoric and Protohistoric Swāt, Pakistan (c. 3000-1400 bc:) (Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, Reports and Memoirs, vol. XX). Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
128. Stacul, G. 1992a. Swāt, Pirak and connected problems (mid-2nd millennium BC.). In South Asian Archaeology 1989 (Monographs in World Archaeology no. 14), C. Jarrige (ed.), I: 267-70. Madison, WI.
129. Stacul, G. 1992b. Further evidence for the 'Inner Asia Complex' from Swāt. In South Asian Archaeology Studies, G.L. Possehl (ed.), 111-22. New Delhi.
130. Stacul, G. and S.S. Tusa 1977. Report on the excavations at Ahgrāma (Swāt, Pakistan) 1974. East and West XXVII, 151-206.
131. Starr, F. 1904. The Ainu Group at the Saint Louis Exposition. Chicago: Open Court.
132. Sun, T.J. 1993. A historical-comparative study of the Tain (Mirish) branch in Tibeto-Burman. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
133. Thapar, B.K. 1985. Recent Archaeological Discoveries in India, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
134. Thapar, B.K. 1989. Neolithic. In An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology, 2 vols. A Ghosh (Ed.), 1: 43-9. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
135. Thurgood, G. 1985. Pronouns, verbal agreement systems, and the sub-grouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan Area: the state of the art -papers presented to Paul K. Benedict for his 71st birthday, Pacific Linguistics C-87, G. Thurgood, J.A. Matisoff and D. Bradley (eds), 376-400.' Canberra: Australian National University.
136. Thurgood, G. 1994. Tai-Kadai and Austronesian: the nature of the historical relationship. Oceanic Linguistics 33 (2), 345-68.
137. Tiffou, É. and J. Pesot. 1989. Contes du Yasin: introduction an bourouchaski du Yasin avec grammaire et dictionnaire analytique (Études bourouchaski 1, SELAF no. 303). Paris: Peeters/SELAF.
138. Verneau, R. 1894. La fête de Pours chez les Aïnos. L'Anthropologic V, 508-9.
139. Vovin, A. 1994. Is Japanese related to Austronesian? Oceanic Linguistics 33 (2), 369-90.
140. Wáng Héngjié 1975. Xīzàng Zìzhìqū Línzhī xiàn fāxiàn de xīn shíqì shídài yízhǐ (A Neolithic site discovered in Nying-khri county in the Autonomous Region of Tibet). Káogǔ 5, 310-15.
141. Wheeler, R.E.M. 1959. Early India and Pakistan to Ashoka. London: Thames & Hudson.
142. Wú Zhèn 1964. Xīnjiāng dōngbù de jǐ chù xīn shíqì shídài yízhǐ (Several Neolithic-sites in the eastern portion of Xīnjiāng). Káogǔ 7: 333-45.
143. Xià Nài 1977. Tàn-shísì cèdìng niándài hé Zhōngguó shǐqián káogǔ xué (C-14 dating and the prehistoric archaeology of China). Káogǔ 4: 217-32.
144. Xīzàng Zìzhìqū Wénwù Guánlǐ Wěi yuán Huì (Managing Committee for Cultural Affairs of the Autonomous Region of Tibet) 1979. Xīzàng Chāngdū Kǎruò yízhǐ shìjué jiǎ̌n bào (Brief report of an initial excavation of the site at 'Kǎruò', Chab-mdo, Tibet). Wenwù 9, 22-8.
145. Xu Chaolong 1991. The cultural links over the Himalaya ranges in the prehistoric period. Orient: Report of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan XXVII, 12-35.
146. Yán Wèiqing 1981. Gānsù Qín'ān Dàdìwān xīn shíqì shídài zǎo qī yícún (Early Neolithic remains from Dàdìwān, Qín'ān, Gānsù). Wénwù 1, 1-8.
147. Yán Wénmíng 1989. Zài lùn Zhōngguó dàozuò nóngyè de qǐyuán (Another discussion on the origin of Chinese rice agriculture). Nóngyè Káogǔ 2, 72-83.
148. Yan Wénmíng 1990. China's earliest rice agriculture remains. In Indo-Pacfic Prehistory 1990: papers from the 14th Indo-Pacfic Prehistory Association Congress, Yogyakarta. P. Bellwood (ed.), I: 118-26. Canbesrra: Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association.
149. Zhang Péngchuan and Zhōu Guǎngjì 1981. Shìtán Dàdiwān yi qī hé qítā lèixíng wénhuà de guānxi (Tentative discussion of the connection between Dàdìwān I and other cultures). Wénwù 1, 9-15; 86.
150. Zhang Xuézhèng, Zhāng Péngchuan and Guō Déyǒng 1980. Tán Mǎjiāyáo, Bànshān, Máchǎng lèixíng de fēn qī hé xiānghù guānxi (On the periodization and interrelationships of the Mǎjiā yáo, Bànshān, Máchǎng types). In Zhōngguó káogǔ xućhuì dì yí cì niánhuì lùnwén jí, 1979 (Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of the Chinese Archaeological Society, 1979), 50-71. Wénwù Chūbǎnshè, Peking.