Concordance between important change and acceptable symptom state following knee arthroplasty: The role of baseline scores

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1107-1110

  Escobar, A ^a,b   Riddle, D L ^c  

^a HOSPITAL DE BASURTO   (Spain)

^b Red de Investigacion en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Cronicas REDISSEC   (Spain)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; MCID; PASS

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTABLE SYMPTOM STATE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPAIN; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905583666     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kvien T.K., Heiberg T., Hagen K.B. Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean?. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66(Suppl 3):iii40-iii41.
2. Losina E., Katz J.N. Total knee replacement: pursuit of the paramount result. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012, 51:1735-1736.
3. Tubach F., Dougados M., Falissard B., Baron G., Logeart I., Ravaud P. Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:526-530.
4. Maxwell J.L., Felson D.T., Niu J., Wise B., Nevitt M.C., Singh J.A., et al. Does clinically important change in function after knee replacement guarantee good absolute function? The multicenter osteoarthritis study. J Rheumatol 2014, 41:60-64.
5. Escobar A., Gonzalez M., Quintana J.M., Vrotsou K., Bilbao A., Herrera-Espineira C., et al. Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012, 20:87-92.
6. Davis A.M., Perruccio A.V., Lohmander L.S. Minimally clinically important improvement: all non-responders are not really non-responders an illustration from total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012, 20:364-367.
7. Judge A., Arden N.K., Cooper C., Kassim J.M., Carr A.J., Field R.E., et al. Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012, 51:1804-1813.
8. Perrot S., Bertin P. "Feeling better" or "feeling well" in usual care of hip and knee osteoarthritis pain: determination of cutoff points for patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) at rest and on movement in a national multicenter cohort study of 2414 patients with painful osteoarthritis. Pain 2013, 154:248-256.
9. Meyer R.J. U.S. regulatory perspective on the minimal clinically important difference in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD 2005, 2:47-49.
10. Escobar A., Garcia P.L., Herrera-Espineira C., Aizpuru F., Sarasqueta C., Gonzalez Saenz de T.M., et al. Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013, 21:2006-2012.
11. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., Stitt L.W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
12. Escobar A., Quintana J.M., Bilbao A., Azkarate J., Guenaga J.I. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clin Rheumatol 2002, 21:466-471.
13. Tubach F., Ravaud P., Baron G., Falissard B., Logeart I., Bellamy N., et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:34-37.
14. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
15. Judge A., Arden N.K., Kiran A., Price A., Javaid M.K., Beard D., et al. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:412-418.