Predicted runoff loads of permethrin to the sacramento river and its tributaries

ACS Symposium Series

Volumn 991, Issue , 2008, Pages 223-237

  Dasgupta, S ^a   Cheplick, J M ^a   Denton, D L ^b   Troyan, J J ^c   Williams, W M ^a  

^a Waterborne Environmental Inc   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PESTICIDES; RUNOFF;

DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATIONS; FURROW IRRIGATION; MODEL SIMULATION; POTENTIAL SOURCES; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; SACRAMENTO RIVER; TEMPORAL PROBABILITIES; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

LOADING;

EID: 84905582170     PISSN: 00976156     EISSN: 19475918     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2008-0991.ch011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). Relative Risk Evaluation for Pesticides Used in the Sacramento Valley, 2006.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticide Root Zone Model Field and Orchard Crop Scenario Metadata. Pesticides: Science and Policy, 2004. URL http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/metadata.htm.
3. Suarez, L.A. PRZM-3, A model for predicting pesticide and nitrogen fate in the crop root and unsaturated soil zones: users manual for release 3.12.2, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, 2005.
4. California Department of Pesticide Regulation. California Pesticide Information Portal Database. URL http://calpip.cdpr.ca.gov/cfdocs/calpip/prod/ main.cfm (accessed September 2005).
5. California Spatial Information Library. California Interagency Watershed Map of 1999 (CalWater 2.2.1). URL http://gis.ca.gov/meta.epl?oid=22175 (accessed September 2005).
6. U.S. Department of Agriculture. The ARS Pesticide Properties Database. Agricultural Research Service. URL http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm? docid=14199 (accessed September 2005).
7. U.S. Department of Agriculture. State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Database. National Cartography and GIS Center. URL http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil-info/ index.cgi?soil-data&statsgo (accessed September 2005).
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling (CEAM). Meteorological Data. July 2002. URL http://www.epa.gov/ ceampubl/tools/metdata/index.htm (accessed September 2005).
9. University of California Cooperative Extension, 2002. Trial results of field corn production for Yolo/Solano/Sacramento counties. 2002. URL ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/2557/10282.pdf.
10. Le Strange, M.; Schrader, W.L.; Hartz, T.K. 2000. Fresh-market tomato production in California. Publication 8017. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2002. URL http://anrcatalog.ucdavis/edu/pdf/ 8017.pdf.
11. Hansen, B. Extension Irrigation Specialist. University of California, Davis. Department of Land, Air, & Water Resources. (Phone conversation on November 13, 2006).
12. Schwab G.O.; Fangmeier, D.D.; Elliot, W.J.; Frevert, R.K. Soil and Water Conservation Engineering. Fourth edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: USA, 1993.
13. Haan, C T . Statistical Methods in Hydrology. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, 1977.
14. FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force Final Report. Jones, R.L; Russell, M.H., Eds; American Crop Protection Association: Washington, DC, 2001 URL http://femvtf.com/femvtf/Files/FEMVTFbodv.pdf (accessed June 2007).
15. Snyder N.J.; Williams, W.M. Exposure assessment model for diazinon sources in the Sacramento River Basin's Main Drainage Canal. Sacramento River Watershed Program, 2004. URL www.sacriver.org/subcommittees/ag/documents (accessed June 2007).