Erratum: Attributing Effects to Interactions (Epidemiology (2014) 25 (711-722) DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000096);Attributing effects to interactions

Epidemiology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 711-722

  Vanderweele, Tyler J ^a   Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CASE CONTROL STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; SMOKING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EFFECT MODIFIER, EPIDEMIOLOGIC; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING;

EID: 84905566960     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000257     Document Type: Erratum

References (27)

1. R othman KJ, Greenland S, Walker AM. Concepts of interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112:467-470.
2. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:71-83.
3. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. 1st ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown and Company; 1986:311-326.
4. Khoury MJ, Flanders WD. Nontraditional epidemiologic approaches in the analysis of gene-environment interaction: case-control studies with no controls! Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:207-213.
5. VanderWeele TJ, Asomaning K, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, et al. Genetic variants on 15q25.1, smoking, and lung cancer: an assessment of mediation and interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:1013-1020.
6. I mai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15:309-334.
7. Valeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013;18:137-150.
8. VanderWeele TJ. A three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects. Epidemiology. 2013;24:224-232.
9. R obins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3:143-155.
10. VanderWeele TJ. Policy-relevant proportions for direct effects. Epidemiology. 2013;24:175-176.
11. VanderWeele TJ. Reconsidering the denominator of the attributable proportion for interaction. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28:779-784.
12. Skrondal A. Interaction as departure from additivity in case-control studies: a cautionary note. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:251-258.
13. Miller DP, Liu G, De Vivo I, et al. Combinations of the variant genotypes of GSTP1, GSTM1, and p53 are associated with an increased lung cancer risk. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2819-2823.
14. Hung RJ, McKay JD, Gaborieau V, et al. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature. 2008;452:633-637.
15. A mos CI, Wu X, Broderick P, et al. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet. 2008;40:616-622.
16. L i Y, Sheu CC, Ye Y, et al. Genetic variants and risk of lung cancer in never smokers: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:321-330.
17. T ruong T, Hung RJ, Amos CI, et al. Replication of lung cancer susceptibility loci at chromosomes 15q25, 5p15, and 6p21: a pooled analysis from the International Lung Cancer Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:959-971.
18. VanderWeele TJ, Knol MJ. A tutorial on interaction. Epidemiol Method.s.
19. VanderWeele TJ, Robins JM. The identification of synergism in the sufficient-component-cause framework. Epidemiology. 2007;18:329-339.
20. VanderWeele TJ. Sufficient cause interactions and statistical interactions. Epidemiology. 2009;20:6-13.
21. VanderWeele TJ. Epistatic interactions. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2010;9:Article 1, 1-22.
22. Kraft P, Yen YC, Stram DO, Morrison J, Gauderman WJ. Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations. Hum Hered. 2007;63:111-119.
23. C hatterjee N, Kalaylioglu Z, Moslehi R, Peters U, Wacholder S. Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:1002-1016.
24. Dai JY, Logsdon BA, Huang Y, et al. Simultaneously testing for marginal genetic association and gene-environment interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:164-173.
25. G reenland S. Interactions in epidemiology: relevance, identification, and estimation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:14-17.
26. VanderWeele TJ. On the distinction between interaction and effect modification. Epidemiology. 2009;20:863-871.
27. VanderWeele TJ, Knol MJ. Interpretation of subgroup analyses in randomized trials: heterogeneity versus secondary interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:680-683.