Quality control in soil chemical analysis

Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 51-69

  Swyngedouw, C ^a   Lessard, R ^a  

^a Levelton's Environmental Division   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905506943     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Alberta Environment (AENV). 2004. Alberta Environment Laboratory Data Quality Assurance Policy Procedures and Guidelines. [Online] Available at: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/protenf/pubucations/Laboratory_Data_Quality_Assurance:Policy_Procedures_2004.pdf (verified March 2005).
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2004. D4515-85(2001). Standard Practice for Estimation of Holding Time for Water Samples Containing Organic Constituents. ASTM Book of Standards, Vol. 11.02. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 1985. In G.T. Wernimont, Ed. Use of Statistics to Develop and Evaluate Analytical Methods. AOAC, Arlington, VA.
4. Bevington, P. and Robinson, D.K. 2003. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Toronto.
5. British Columbia Ministry of the Environment (BCME). Environmental Protection Division, Water, Air and Climate Change Branch 2003. Part A: Quality Control and Quality Assurance. In BC Field Sampling Manual: 2003. [Online] Available at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/wamr/labsys/field_man_03.html#pdf (verified February 2006).
6. See also Section A: Laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality Control. In BC Environmental Laboratory Manual: 2005. [Online] Available at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/wamr/labsys/lab_man_05.html (verified February 2005).
7. Canadian Association of Environmental Analytical Laboratories (CAEAL). 1999. Template for the Design and Development ofa Quality Manual for Environmental Laboratories [Online] and QC for Environmental Laboratories. [Online] Available at: http://www.caeal.ca/t_caealpubs.html (verified March 2005).
8. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 1993. Volume I: Main Report. In Guidance Manual of Sampling, Analysis, and Data Management for Contaminated Sites. CCME, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
9. Environment Canada. 2002a. Contaminated Site Remediation Section Technical Assistance Bulletins. [Online] Available at: http://www.on. ec.gc.ca/pollution/ecnpd/contaminassist_e.html [verified March 2005]. This Webpage shows a list of Technical Assistance Bulletins. See Section 5: QC samples in Tab#4: Sampling and Analysis of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil.
10. Environment Canada. 2002b. Guidance Document for the Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining Effluents. [Online] Available at: http://www.ec.gc.ca/nopp/docs/rpt/2MM5/en/C7.cfm (verified October 2004).
11. Eurachem. 2000. Eurachem Guide: Qualifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 2nd Edition. [Online] Available at: http://www.eurachem.ul.pt/guides/QUAM2000-1.pdf (verified February 2007).
12. Garfield, F.M., Klesta, E., and Hirsch, J. 2000. Quality Assurance Principles for Analytical Laboratories, 3rd edn. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
13. Gerlach, R., Dobb, D.E., Raab, G.A., and Nocerino, J.M. 2002. Gy Sampling Theory in Environmental Studies. 1. Assessing Soil Splitting Protocols. J. Chemometr. 16: 321-328.
14. Hoskins, B. and Wolf, A.M. 1998. Laboratory quality assurance program. In Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. North Central Regional Research Publication No. 221 (revised), pp. 65-69. Available at: http:// muextension.missouri.edu/explorepdf/miscpubs/sb1001.pdf (verified February 2006).
15. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2004. Soil Sampling for Environmental Contaminants. IAEA-TECDOC-1415. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Worked DQOs examples p. 39.
16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2005. ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. [Online] Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/en/Catalogue DetailPage. CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER = 39883&ICS1 = 3&ICS2 = 120&ICS3 = 20 (01 March 2006).
17. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). 1997. Chapter 18. Quality assurance of analytical processes. In Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature Definitive Rules 1997. [Online] Available at: http://www.iupac.org/publications/analytical_compendium/(verified March 2005).
18. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). 2005. Terminology in Soil Sampling. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry Division. Pure Appl. Chem. 77(5): 827-841.
19. Jenkins, T.F., Walsh, M.E., Thorne, P.G., Thiboutot, S., Ampleman, G., Ranney, T.A., and Grant, C.L. 1997. Assessment of Sampling Error Associated with Collection and Analysis of Soil Samples at a Firing Range Contaminated with HMX. [Online] Available at: http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/techpub/CRREL_Reports/reports/SR97_22.pdf (07 March 2005).
20. Keith, L.H. 1991. Environmental Sampling and Analysis-A Practical Guide. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
21. Keith, L.H. 2002. Environmental Monitoring and Measurement Advisor-A New Expert System. [Online] Available at: http://www.emma-expertsystem.com/EMMA-WTQA.html (verified April 2006).
22. Kelly, W.D., Ratcliff, T.A., and Nenadic, C. Jr. 1992. Basic Statistics for Laboratories-A Primer for Laboratory Workers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
23. Lewis, D.L. 1988. Assessing and controlling sample contamination. In L.H. Keith, Ed. Principles ofEnvironmental Sampling. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 118-144.
24. Maskarinic, M.P. and Moody, R.L. 1988. Storage and preservation of environmental sample. In L.H. Keith, Ed. Principles ofEnvironmental Sampling. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 145-155.
25. Pulsipher, B., Gilbert, R., and Wilson, J. 2003. Measurement Uncertainty in Visual Sample Plan. [Online] Available at: http://dqo.pnl.gov/vsp/PNNLSA38977.pdf (verified February 2006).
26. Ramsey, M.H. 1998. Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 13: 97-104.
27. Standards Council of Canada (SCC). 2005. Programs and Services-Laboratories. [Online] Available at: http: //www.scc.ca/en/programs/laboratory/index.shtml (verified March 2005).
28. Swyngedouw, C., Chapman, M., Johnston, J., Kubik, S., Montgomery, S., Nam, C., Seveck, M., Shuvell, C.-A., and Lessard, R. 2004. Laboratory Measurement Uncertainty. Environmental Informatics Archives 2: 200-212. [Online] Available at: http: // www.iseis.org/EIA/pdfstart.asp?no = 04023 (verified May 2006).
29. Taylor, J.K. 1988. Defining the accuracy, precision, and confidence limits of sample data. In L.H. Keith, Ed. Principles of Environmental Sampling. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 101-107.
30. Taylor, J.K. 1990. Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
31. Taylor, J.K. 1997. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurement, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA.
32. United Nations-Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 1998. Guidelines for Quality Management in Soil and Plant Laboratories. [Online] Availableat: http:// www.fao.org/docrep/W7295E/w7295e00.htm (verified March 2005).
33. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2005. Chapter 5: Holding Times and Preservation in Environmental Quality-Guidance for Evaluating Performance-Based Chemical Data. EM 200-1-10 (June 2005). [Online] Available at: http://www.usace.army.mil/usace-docs/eng-manuals/em200-1-10/(verified February 2006).
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit. 40 CFR136.2 Appendix B. [Online] Available at: http://ca.water.usgs.gov/pnsp/rep/interpret/def.html (verified February 2006).
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User's Guide, 2nd edn. [Online] Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/cmb/research/bs122.pdf (verified February 2006).
36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1996. Revised Data Validation Guidance 12/96. [Online] Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ne/oeme (verified March 2005).
37. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000a. Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process (QA/G-4). August 2000. [Online] Available at: http: //www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g4-final.pdf (verified February 2006).
38. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000b. Chapter 5: Draw Conclusions from the Data, in Practical Methods for Data Analysis, Guidance for Data Quality Assessment. EPA QA/G-9, QA00 Version (July 2000). [Online] Available at: www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g9-final.pdf (verified February 2006).
39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003. Exhibit E Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures and Requirements. In Analytical Methods-Statement of Work for Organic Analysis OLM04.2. [Online] Available at: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/clp/olm4.htm (verified March 2005).
40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2004. Agency-wide Quality System Documents. [Online] Available at: http: www.epa.govqualityqa_docs.html (verified March 2005).