Biomass integrated gasification combined cogeneration with or without CO2 capture - A comparative thermodynamic study

Renewable Energy

Volumn 72, Issue , 2014, Pages 243-252

  Jana, Kuntal ^a   De, Sudipta ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

BIGCC; Comparative performance; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; FOSSIL FUELS; GREENHOUSE GASES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ASPEN PLUS; BIGCC; BIOMASS INTEGRATED GASIFICATION; COGENERATION SYSTEMS; COMBINED COGENERATION; COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE; ENERGY EFFICIENT SYSTEMS; THERMODYNAMIC STUDIES;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FOSSIL FUEL; GREENHOUSE GAS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84905505221     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gaye A. Human development report, fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world 2007/2008, Access to Energy and Human Development.
2. IEA World energy outlook 2011, International Energy Agency, Paris.
3. IPCC. IPCC 4th assessment report, climate change 2007 (AR4), (available at:). http://www.ipcc.ch/.
4. 2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights 2011, International Energy Agency, Paris.
5. Rubin E.S., Mantripragada H., Marks A., Verstee P., Kitchin J. The outlook for improved carbon capture technology. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2012, 38(5):630-671.
6. Yang H., Xu Z., Fan M., Gupta R., Slimane R.B., Bland A.E., et al. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review. JEnviron Sci 2008, 20:14-27.
7. 2 capture with alkaline solution: a brief review. Energy Procedia 2012, 14:1515-1522.
8. Cormos C.-C. Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Energy 2012, 42:434-445.
9. Scheffknecht G., Al-Makhadmeh L., Schnell U., Maier J. Oxy-fuel coal combustion-a review of the current state-of-the-art. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2011, 5S:S16-S35.
10. 2 capture in coal-fired power plants-Impact on plant performance. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2011, 5(4):710-726.
11. Majoumerd M.M., De S., Assadi M., Breuhaus P. An EU initiative for future generation of IGCC power plants using hydrogen-rich syngas: simulation results for the baseline configuration. Appl Energy 2012, 99:280-290.
12. Cormos C.-C. Assessment of flexible energy vectors poly-generation based on coal and biomass/solid wastes co-gasification with carbon capture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38(19):7855-7866.
13. Cormos C.-C. Hydrogen and power co-generation based on coal and biomass/solid wastes co-gasification with carbon capture and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:5637-5648.
14. Shabani S., Delavar M.A., Azmi M. Investigation of biomass gasification hydrogen and electricity co-production with carbon dioxide capture and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38:3630-3639.
15. 2 capture and storage from renewable biomass in pulp and paper mills. Renew Energy 2004, 29:1583-1598.
16. Rhodes J.S., Keith D.W. Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 29:440-450.
17. Kraxner F., Aoki K., Leduc S., Kindermann G., Fuss S., Yang J., et al. BECCS in South Korea - analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool. Renew Energy 2014, 61:102-108.
18. 2 capture and storage. Renew Energy 2007, 32:1006-1019.
19. Antonopoulos I.S., Karagiannidis A., Gkouletsos A., Perkoulidis G. Modelling of a downdraft gasifier fed by agricultural residues. Waste Manag 2012, 32:710-718.
20. Seth P.N., Babu B.V. Experimental studies on producer gas generation from wood wastes in a downdraft biomass gasifier. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100:3127-3133.
21. Calvo L.F., Gil M.V., Otero M., Morán A., García A.I. Gasification of rice straw in a fluidized-bed gasifier for syngas application in close-coupled boiler-gasifier systems. Bioresour Technol 2012, 109:206-214.
22. Ramzan N., Ashraf A., Naveed S., Malik A. Simulation of hybrid biomass gasification using Aspen Plus: a comparative performance analysis for food, municipal solid and poultry wastes. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:3962-3969.
23. Doherty W., Reynolds A., Kennedy D. The effect of air preheating in a biomass CFB gasifier using ASPEN Plus simulation. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33:1158-1167.
24. De Kam M.J., Morey R.V., Tiffany D.G. Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle for heat and power at ethanol plants. Energy Convers Manag 2009, 50:1682-1690.
25. Schuster G., Loffler G., Weigl K., Hofbauer H. Biomass steam gasification - an extensive parametric modeling study. Bioresour Technol 2001, 77(1):71-79.
26. Paviet F., Chazarenc F., Tazerout M. Thermo chemical equilibrium modeling of a biomass gasifying process using ASPEN Plus. Int J Chem React Eng 2009, 7:A40.
27. Li X.T., Grace J.R., Lim C.J., Watkinson A.P., Chen H.P., Kim J.R. Biomass gasification in a circulating fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:171-193.
28. 2 capture from power plants Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2007, I:37-46.
29. Thouchprasitchai N., Luengnaruemitchai A., Pongstabodee S. Water-gas shift reaction over Cu-Zn, Cu-Fe, and Cu-Zn-Fe composite-oxide catalysts prepared by urea-nitrate combustion. J Ind Eng Chem 2013, 19(5):1483-1492.
30. 2 catalyst for a single-stage water-gas shift reaction: Ti addition effect. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38(14):6044-6051.
31. Brenno A.L., Galletti C., Specchia S. Studies on Au catalysts for water gas shift reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36(13):7750-7758.
32. Aspen Plus® 2010-Aspen Tech. Cambridge, MA.
33. Hilliard M. Apredictive thermodynamic model for an aqueous blend of potassium carbonate, piperazine and monoethanolamine for carbon dioxide from flue gas 2008, [PhD thesis], University of Texas at Austin, USA.
34. Phillips S., Aden A., Jechura J., Dayton D., Eggeman T. Thermochemical ethanol via indirect gasification and mixed alcohol synthesis of lignocellulosic biomass 2007, Technical Report-NREL/TP-510-41168.
35. Guo Z., Wang Q., Fang M., Luo Z., Cen K. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of polygeneration system integrating atmospheric pressure coal pyrolysis technology with circulating fluidized bed power plant. Appl Energy 2014, 113:1301-1314.
36. 2 capture in coal IGCC processes via gas separation membranes. Fuel Process Technol 2004, 85:337-346.
37. Chemical engineering 2013, [last accessed 05.05.14]. http://www.che.com/PCI.
38. Swanson R.M., Satrio J.A., Brown R.C., Platon A., Hsu D.D. Techno-economic analysis of biofuels production based on gasification 2010, Technical Report-NREL/TP-6A20-46587.
39. Van Dael M., Van Passel S., Pelkmans L., Guisson R., Reumermann P., Luzardo N.M., et al. Atechno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park. Appl Energy 2013, 104:611-622.
40. OECD/IEA Electricity information (2012 edition), IEA statistics 2012.
41. Henao C.A. Simulación y Evaluación de Procesos Químicos 2005, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.